List series Archives - Page 4 of 12

5 Tales from the Crypto: Binance, JP Morgan Chase, Quant, IDVerse, and Ripple Make Waves

By David Penn Posted on October 11, 2023
Categories: Cryptocurrency, List series

This week’s edition of 5 Tales from the Crypto features a pair of stories from cryptocurrency exchange Binance, concerns over crypto-crime and innovations in tokenization from JP Morgan Chase, and a look at a new product, a new partnership, and a new payments license.

Cryptocurrency exchange Binance announced that e-wallet service provider and payment gateway, SticPay will partner with Binance’s payment solution, BinancePay. BinancePay is a contactless, borderless, secure, cryptocurrency payment technology. SticPay will leverage the solution to enhance and streamline its users’ access to a range of leading cryptocurrencies.

SticPay has more than one million users and 5,000 corporate customers in 200+ countries. Courtesy of the new partnership, SticPay users will be able to fund their accounts directly via BinancePay. This will enable them to buy, sell, and send more than 70 leading cryptocurrencies faster and cheaper, which SticPay CEO Sean Park called the company’s mission. “Our users will be able to handle more cryptocurrencies, more efficiently than ever before,” Park said.

The BinancePay news comes just a few weeks after Binance announced that it would sell its Russian business to CommEx. The off-boarding process is expected to take up to a year. Binance said in a statement that the assets of Russian accountholders are safe.

Binance Chief Compliance Officer Noah Perlman noted that the company remained positive on the long-term growth of the cryptocurrency industry worldwide. Nevertheless, he added, “operating in Russia is not compatible with Binance’s compliance strategy.”

The parting of ways between Binance and Russia is total. The company noted that it will have no ongoing revenue split from the sale of its Russia business to CommEx. Binance also did not maintain any option to buy back shares in the business as part of the sale.

Sometimes the gods of cryptocurrency giveth and sometimes they taketh away. In recent weeks, JP Morgan has represented both tendencies with regards to its openness to crypto and digital assets.

A few weeks ago, we learned that JP Morgan Chase UK will ban its customers from making crypto transactions, beginning on October 16. The bank blamed a high number of fraud and scam incidents for its decision. Specifically, according to a bank spokesperson, Chase customers will be unable to buy crypto assets using a Chase debit card. They will also be unable to transfer money to a cryptocurrency account from a Chase account.

Chase is hardly the only financial institution to place limits on its customer’s ability to transact in cryptocurrencies. NatWest limited the amount of money customers can send to crypto exchanges back in March, citing concerns over “crypto criminals.” Santander Bank has also moved to prevent its customers in the U.K. from sending real-time payments to crypto exchanges.

At the same time, JP Morgan Chase has become increasingly interested in blockchain technology and the opportunities in tokenization. This week, JP Morgan unveiled its Tokenized Collateral Network (TCN). The new platform leverages blockchain technology to enable investors to use digital assets as collateral and, further, to transfer collateral ownership without having to transfer assets in the underlying ledgers.

The first public transaction using TCN involved JPMorgan and BlackRock. JP Morgan leveraged its Onyx Digital Assets tokenization platform to convert shares of a money market fund into digital tokens. Those tokens were then transferred to Barclays bank via TCN to be used as a security for an OTC derivatives exchange between JPMorgan and BlackRock.

“The tokenization of money market fund shares as collateral in clearing and margining transactions would dramatically reduce the operational friction in meeting margin calls when segments of the market face acute margin pressures,” BlackRock deputy global COO of cash management Tom McGrath said.

The hope for TCN is that the technology will reduce the number of settlement fails and provide near-instant real-time changes in ownership. TCN is live and a number of clients and transactions are reportedly on deck.

Cryptocurrency exchange Birake Exchange has turned to IDVerse to provide identity verification. The platform specializes in Masternode coins and will leverage its new relationship with IDVerse (formerly known as OCR Labs) to provide KYC and secure digital identity verification (IDV) during the onboarding process.

In a statement, the Romania-based Birake Exchange team underscored its belief in the future of cryptocurrencies and the importance of decentralization. “To mitigate fraud risks while fostering public confidence, judicious customer due diligence through identity verification has become a priority for us,” the team said.

Founded in 2018, the Birake Exchange refers to itself as a “white label crypto exchange” because it offers trading technology that enables its customers to build and brand their own crypto exchanges. The Birake Network has its own blockchain, which is powered by the Birake Coin (BIR).

As OCR Labs, IDVerse demoed its technology at FinovateAsia 2017, winning Best of Show. The company rebranded as IDVerse earlier this year.

Blockchain company Quant has introduced a new solution designed to make blockchain-based transactions more secure for financial institutions. The new offering, Overledger Authorise, helps FIs manage and integrate digital asset private keys with their own current enterprise key management systems. The technology covers the incompatibility gap between existing systems and blockchain private keys by managing the signing of blockchain transactions and key generation.

Quant founder and CEO Gilbert Verdian noted that the success of blockchain technology in banking will depend on innovations in other technologies. “We cannot unlock (blockchain technology’s) true potential without robust and future-proof solutions for cryptographic key management and transaction authorization,” Verdian said.

Overledger Authorise has been stress-tested successfully in Project Rosalind. Project Rosalind is a central bank digital currency project conducted by the Bank of England and the Bank for International Settlements.

Headquartered in London, Quant was founded in 2015.

Ripple’s Singapore-based subsidiary, Ripple Markets APAC, secured its Major Payments Institution (MPI) license from the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). The MAS gave Ripple Markets in-principal approval earlier this year. The license paves the way for Ripple Markets APAC to issue digital payment tokens (DPTs).

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse called Singapore “pivotal” to the company’s global business. Ripple established Singapore as its Asia Pacific headquarters in 2017. Garlinghouse referred to Singapore as “one of the leading fintech and digital asset hubs striking the balance between innovation, consumer protection and responsible growth.”

A Finovate alum since debuting as OpenCoin in 2013, Ripple has grown into a major enterprise blockchain solution provider for the financial services industry. Earlier this year, Ripple won a court ruling that its native cryptocurrency, XRP, was a digital token and “not in and of itself a ‘contract,’. As such, the court rules that Ripple was not guilty of selling unregistered securities – as accused by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in 2020.

Photo by Pok Rie

Share this:

Send Post Twitter LinkedIn Facebook

Top Takeaways on Open Banking from FinovateFall

By David Penn Posted on September 20, 2023
Categories: FinovateFall 2023, List series

Of all the takes I’ve heard about open banking over the past week, here is a great one I did not hear courtesy of The Finanser’s Chris Skinner: open banking is bad branding.

The core issue is that banking and finance is being ripped open by technologies to ensure better service, data enrichment, machine learning, more knowledge … but to achieve this, the service is no longer delivered by one company: a bank. It is delivered by multiple service providers through apps, APIs and analytics. That’s what Open Banking is all about. It just has the wrong name. We don’t want Open Banking. We want Closed Banking.

A typically heterodox take from Skinner and a prompt I would have loved to put to our open banking panelists at FinovateFall last week.

As it turned out, our conversation revolved around other issues – from the role of regulation to the differences in the evolution of open banking between countries and regions. But the same issues raised by Skinner this week were not far away. See for yourself in our brief summary of the top takeaways from our FinovateFall discussion.

User Experience Matters

One area of major agreement on the panel was that user experience was an undervalued aspect of the appeal (or lack thereof) of open banking. Imran Haider, Director of Product, Intuit Data Exchange, noted that the user experience for a customer connecting to their bank via an open banking flow can vary significantly. He cited the occurrence of everything from cumbersome flows to basic performance issues as obstacles to wider acceptance of open banking. “If we really want to unlock the power of customer permissioned data sharing,” Haider said, “then we need better standards and approaches on the UX side.”

Location Shapes the Market

Appreciating the way open banking is evolving differently across geographies was another key takeaway from our conversation on open banking. Florencia Ardissone, Head of Product, Customer Insights & ChaseNet Analytics, JP Morgan Chase, led with this insight. In places like the U.K., Europe, and Australia, open banking has evolved courtesy of a highly-engaged regulatory authority. By contrast, in countries like India, market forces have tended to lead, with the drive for greater financial inclusion often fueling innovation. As such, we should expect the evolution of open banking in the U.S. – however slow and sluggish – to develop based on the unique features of the U.S. banking system – including the massive number of players.

Open Banking Demands Identity Management

Skinner’s skepticism about consumer appetites for “open” banking is also a great way to understand another key takeaway from our Open Banking conversation: the idea that open banking is integrally linked to identity management. Sasha Dobrolioubov, Head of Partnerships at Persona, made the point that it critical that those financial institutions involved in open banking – the banks, the fintechs – need to have a “strong identity presence” to foster trust between would-be open banking consumers and providers.

Regulation Defines the Opportunity

The funny thing about the evolution of Open Banking in the U.S. is that has taken both the route of market-driven innovation as well as the path laid by regulators, particularly the CFPB. Kevin Jacques, Partner at Cota Capital, noted that the access to account data component of open banking evolved ahead of regulations. Jacques cited innovators – and Finovate alums – like Plaid, MX, and Finicity as examples.

That said, with pending CFPB regulations potentially limiting and restricting collection of account data based on a narrower view on consumer consent, innovation in this aspect of open banking is likely to be impacted.

Photo by Amina Filkins

Share this:

Send Post Twitter LinkedIn Facebook

3 Ways Finovate Underpins Sustainability

By Julie Muhn (@julieschicktanz) Posted on September 6, 2023
Categories: FinovateFall 2023, List series, Marketing

Environmental, social, and governance– better known as ESG– initiatives are hot topics across the fintech and banking sectors. And as a fintech and banking conference, we’ve taken a look at our own operations to improve our environmental, social, and governance practices.

Below is a breakdown of each ESG aspect, and what we are doing at FinovateFall this year to support and promote a healthier environment.

Environmental responsibility

Reducing carbon emissions
We’re reducing carbon emissions not only in the way we conduct FinovateFall, but also in how we travel to the event by carpooling and taking public transportation when possible.

Environmental sustainability content
FinovateFall will host dedicated on-stage content on environmental sustainability in fintech. In addition to featuring demos from fintechs supporting sustainability, we’re hosting a keynote by Greg O’Gara, Lead Analyst, Wealth Management at Javelin Strategy & Research on Climate Change, ESG & Financial Services, What Do Wall Street & Your Customers Want?

Sustainable development

Sustainable Fintech Scholarship
With our demo scholarship program, Finovate will spotlight underrepresented founders and startups tackling climate change, diversity, and financial inclusion. The program will also help us expand our demo line ups to include more voices, more perspectives, and more cutting-edge thinking within fintech.

Sustainable development goals
Our aim is for FinovateFall to promote long-term sustainable development – in the way that we run the event but also in how it’s implemented in the market as a whole. We are committing to:

Using our content to support the sustainability of the fintech market
Developing close partnerships with charities, companies and associations and giving them a platform to promote their work in the field
Facilitating discussions on pertinent topics including diversity and inclusion, gender balance, sustainability trends, the impact on the environment, and more.

Governance

Operation Backpack
We are supporting Operation Backpack, a Volunteers of America non-profit that provides brand new backpacks and grade-specific school supplies to children living in homeless shelters throughout the five boroughs of New York City. Please help us support this important work by making a donation. Even a small contribution will help!

Diversity and inclusion content
We’re hosting a fireside chat on diversity, and one on financial inclusion. Jim Perry, Senior Strategist at Market Insights will discuss why diversity matters and Melissa Koide, CEO of FinRegLab will talk about driving purpose and profit through financial inclusion.

Startup Booster
FinovateFall’s Startup Booster program offers smaller fintechs a voice in front of a large investor audience. The program is limited to fintech and tech startups who are less than five years old and have raised, at most, Seed capital. Participants will attend a 60-minute reception that will offer face time with investors, as well as a dedicated cocktail table and sign at the event.

Our driving force

Overarching all of this is our initiative called FasterForward, our parent company Informa’s program that embeds sustainability into everything we do and aims to help our customers do the same. With FasterFoward, we are striving to achieve nine specific goals:

Become carbon neutral as a business and across our products by 2025
Halve the waste generated through our products and events by 2025
Become zero waste and net zero carbon by 2030 or earlier
Embed sustainability inside 100% of our brands by 2025
Help and promote the achievement of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals through our brands
Enable one million disconnected people to access networks and knowledge by 2025
Contribute $5bn per year in value for our host cities by 2025
Contribute value of at least 1% of profit before tax to community groups by 2025
Save customers more carbon than we emit by 2025

Photo by Google DeepMind on Unsplash

Share this:

Send Post Twitter LinkedIn Facebook

7 Things to Know about the U.S. Federal Reserve’s Novel Activities Supervision Program

By Julie Muhn (@julieschicktanz) Posted on August 23, 2023
Categories: List series, Thought Leadership

Earlier this month, the Federal Reserve (Fed) rather quietly released a letter that addresses what it is calling the “creation of novel activities.” Signed by Michael S. Gibson, the Board’s Director of the Division of Supervision and Regulation, the letter is titled, Creation of Novel Activities Supervision Program.

If you’re a fintech or a bank, the contents of the letter will likely apply to you. Here are 7 highlights of the newly created program.

Who is impacted

The letter applies to all banking organizations supervised by the Fed, including those with $10 billion or less in consolidated assets. Organizations will receive a written notice from the Fed if their activities will be subject to examination. Those who are still in the exploration phase will be “routinely monitored” for active engagement.

What is it for

The program will focus on activities related to crypto-assets, distributed ledger technology (DLT), and what the Fed is calling “complex, technology-driven partnerships with nonbanks” that deliver financial services to end customers.

The target

The letter explains that the Fed will “enhance supervision” over the following categories:

Partnerships where a non-bank provides banking products and services to end customers via APIs that provide automated access to the bank’s infrastructure.
Activities such as crypto-asset custody, crypto-collateralized lending, facilitating crypto-asset trading, and stablecoin issuance and distribution.
The exploration or use of DLT for issuing tokens or tokenizing securities or other assets.
Organizations that provide traditional banking services to crypto-related companies.

How will it supervise?

The program will leverage existing supervisory processes and will use the Fed’s existing supervisory teams instead of creating a new portfolio to monitor activity. The supervision will be risk-based, meaning that the intensity of the scrutiny will vary based on each firm’s engagement in novel activities mentioned above.

Why

The Fed is seeking to strengthen its existing oversight of banks’ third party fintech partnerships. In the letter, Gibson reasons that innovation can lead to rapid change in banks and in the financial system in general, and that it has the potential to generate risks that can impact banks’ safety and soundness. “Given the novelty of these activities,” he states, “they may create unique questions around their permissibility, may not be sufficiently addressed by existing supervisory approaches, and may raise concerns for the broader financial system.”

Future plans

The Fed explained that it will continue to “build upon and enhance” its technical expertise to stay abreast of fintech trends, the risk associated with the trends, and appropriate controls to manage risk. In addition to increased supervision, the letter explains that the program will help shape supervisory approaches and create guidance for banking organizations engaging in the use of these “novel” technologies.

So what?

The Fed is making it clear that the lack of regulation for fintechs and the Wild West environment of the crypto realm is a thing of the past. This means that fintechs– especially those engaged in crypto– will need to be ready to answer not only to banks, but also to the Federal Reserve. On the flip side, banks will need to be ready to ask a lot more questions before engaging with fintechs, formalize partnership processes, and document all that they can regarding potential risk.

Questions about the letter can be sent via the Federal Reserve’s website..

Photo by Jewel Tolentino

Share this:

Send Post Twitter LinkedIn Facebook

Tales from the Crypto: Coinbase on Futures, Etoro on Trends, Brazil and Canada on CBDCs

By David Penn Posted on August 16, 2023
Categories: Cryptocurrency, List series

Coinbase’s Crypto Futures

Courtesy of a just-secured regulatory approval from the National Futures Association, Coinbase’s U.S. customers will soon get the opportunity to trade futures contracts on cryptocurrencies. Coinbase’s Coinbase Financial Markets has been granted authority to operate as a Futures Commission Merchant (FCM) and offer eligible customers in the U.S. access to crypto futures trading on the Coinbase platform.

In a blog post at the Coinbase website, company Head of Institutional Product, Greg Tusar called the approval a “watershed moment” in the project to bring regulated cryptocurrency products to U.S. customers. The ruling comes as Coinbase is at odds with other regulatory bodies – such as the SEC – over its operating practices.

The ruling also comes at a time when the crypto derivatives market around the world has climbed to 75% of all crypto trading volume. Tusar called this market “a critical trader access point.” This is because crypto derivatives enable traders to participate with more leverage and less upfront capital, as well as give cryptocurrency holders the ability to express long and short positions, and hedge risk.

“Where regulations are clear and sensible, we will work with regulators to receive the authorizations needed to offer products that align with our purpose of using crypto to update the financial system to advance economic freedom and opportunity,” Tusar wrote.

Coinbase made its Finovate debut in 2014. The San Francisco, California-based fintech was founded in 2012.

eToro’s Crypto Trends

Social trading and investment platform eToro announced a new partnership to help its customers stay on top of the latest information about cryptocurrencies. The firm has teamed up with analysis company Reflexivity Research in a content partnership called “BTC etc.” that will provide a weekly overview of the cryptocurrency market as well as a monthly podcast. The weekly overview will focus on key trends. The podcast will feature experts from eToro, Reflexivity Research, and the broader cryptocurrency industry.

“As a crypto pioneer, we see it as our responsibility to provide accessible, timely, and relevant content for our users,” eToro Editor in Chief Mati Alon said. “As the market matures, cryptoassets deserve the same level of attention and coverage as other financial assets. We are excited to collaborate with Reflexivity to increase understanding of crypto.”

A Finovate alum since 2011, eToro has won Best of Show at each of its six Finovate appearances. The company offers trading and investing in stocks, options, and exchange-traded funds (ETFs), as well as cryptocurrencies. eToro offers 0% commissions, the ability to trade fractional shares, and a social network to enable traders and investors to benefit from the wisdom of the platform’s top performers.

EToro has become increasingly bullish on the prospects for cryptocurrencies. The company’s Global Markets Strategist Ben Laidler was quoted earlier this week highlighting three key developments that could put cryptocurrencies back on track by making it easier for institutions to participate in the market.

CBDCs Gain Ground in Brazil, Raise Doubts in Canada

The arguments for and against central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) got an international airing of sorts in recent days.

In Brazil, the country’s central bank has given its CBDC an official name – and logo. Commonly referred to as the “digital real,” the Brazilian Central Bank has decided to call its new digital currency, the Drex. The name refers to both the assets colloquial name, “Real Digital,” with an “e” for “electronic” and an “x” to represent a variety of notions including the concept of “modernity and connection.”

“Drex arrives to make life easier for Brazilians” a press release from the country’s central bank pronounced. “It will provide a secure and regulated environment for developing new businesses and more democratic access to the benefits of the economy’s digitization, both for individuals and entrepreneurs.”

Among the projected use cases for the digital currency are government benefit payouts, which would use a tokenized version of the currency. The bank also believes that the Drex will help accelerate digitalization in the financial sector and ultimately promote financial inclusion.

Meanwhile, some five thousand miles north, the concept of central bank digital currencies is getting a much cooler reception. A new report from the Bank of Canada cast a dim light on the prospect of mass CBDC adoption by Canadians. The blame was placed on the wide number of payment options Canadian consumers and businesses already have.

The staff discussion paper, “Unmet Payment Needs and a Central Bank Digital Currency,” envisions a hypothetical cashless environment, and then considers how a CBDC would solve unmet payment needs in such a society.

The report concludes that for a CBDC to benefit those who have unmet payment needs, the digital currency would first have to secure widespread adoption among the majority of the population. This would be necessary to ensure sufficient digital currency adoption by merchants. The challenge is that insofar as the majority of consumers “already have access to a range of payment options,” it would be unlikely for a significant enough number of these consumers to both widely adopt the digital currency as well as use the CBDC at scale.

The insights from the paper should prove valuable to those who support digital currencies, especially to the degree that digital currencies allegedly support financial inclusion. “The minority of consumers with unmet payment needs will be able to benefit from a CBDC,” the report writers conclude, “if the majority of consumers experience material benefits and therefore drive its use.”

Photo by RDNE Stock project

Share this:

Send Post Twitter LinkedIn Facebook

Four Reasons Why Goldman Sachs and Apple Are Breaking Up

By David Penn Posted on August 2, 2023
Categories: Apple, List series, Thought Leadership

Rumors have circulated that the partnership between one of the biggest names in finance – Goldman Sachs – and one of the biggest names in tech – Apple – is coming to an end.

Specifically, the reports suggest that Goldman Sachs is looking to exit its financial relationship with Apple. Goldman Sachs is Apple’s partner for its Apple Card – and has been since 2019. Goldman Sachs is also Apple’s partner for its Buy Now Pay Later service, currently in beta. Reports from the Wall Street Journal indicate that Goldman Sachs is looking to off-load its Apple credit card business to American Express.

So why has the relationship soured? Here are four possible factors:

Know Your Customer

One of the big headline issues hinting at friction between Goldman Sachs and Apple occurred when Apple CEO Tim Cook was testing the Apple Card and was unable to get approved. The issue had to do with fraud protection protocols on Goldman Sachs’ side. The company’s underwriters rejected the application because, as a well-known, high-profile individual, Tim Cook is often impersonated by fraudsters. This appeared to be a one-off problem at first. But an investigation by the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau led to additional concerns about disputed transactions and, ultimately, reports of gender bias in the granting of credit limit increases. Goldman Sachs was cleared of any wrongdoing, but the drama helped stoke tensions between the company and Apple.

Culture Clash

It’s not surprising that there were issues between the East Coast Wall Street culture of Goldman Sachs and the West Coast Silicon Valley culture of Apple. But there were very real challenges in the working relationship between the two firms. As is often the case when “move fast and break things” technologists team up with the rules-based world of finance, there was a tension between what one person called a focus on “the sleek technology and product pizazz” on the one hand and “regulatory compliance and profitability” on the other. Even at a more mundane level, basic issues such as the timing of billing statements and card design became grist for conflict and development delays.

The Bank Behind the Curtain

Writing at 9to5 Mac, Chance Miller noted that in addition to losing a ton of money with Apple Card – more than $1 billion by January 2022 – there are other ways that Goldman Sachs was losing out on the Apple partnership. Miller points out that not only was Apple developing its own in-house financial service project (called “Project Breakout”), but also there were other aspects of the relationship that ill-served Goldman Sachs. “One thing to keep in mind is that most Apple Card users likely don’t even know Apple Card is backed by Goldman Sachs,” Miller wrote. “Goldman Sachs exists in the backend, and everything else is managed directly through the Apple Wallet app.”

While this relationship is common in fintech and financial services, it seems like a poor approach for Goldman Sachs, which is newer to the consumer business than Chase or American Express and was likely seeking to build its consumer brand via its association with Apple. Couple that issue with the financial losses, and the potential of Apple “breaking out” on its own, and Goldman Sachs may have one more reason to start second-guessing its Apple Card gambit.

Whose Idea Was This Anyway?

When Goldman Sachs first announced its partnership with Apple, there were many who questioned the financial institution’s deepening foray into consumer banking. Goldman Sachs earned its lofty reputation in the world of finance as a leading investment bank and investment management firm. To say that consumer banking was not a core Goldman Sachs competency would be an understatement. But in the wake of the financial crisis, with Wall Street banks desperate for new revenue sources, consumer banking and the rise of fintech were alluring opportunities to an institution like Goldman Sachs. Goldman Sachs had room to grow – and money to burn. The firm also had a brand name and reputation that would help it gain the attention it would need in an increasingly competitive market.

But projects like Marcus rose and plateaued, with an initial rush of deposits leading to overly optimistic profit forecasts and, ultimately, significant losses. Efforts to expand into areas such as investing via Marcus revealed that Goldman Sachs was not as innovative as smaller upstarts like Robinhood. An attempt to leverage opportunities in consumer lending with the acquisition of Buy Now Pay Later startup GreenSky proved costly.

Seen through this lens, Goldman Sachs’s issues with Apple Card may have more to do with Goldman Sach’s issues with consumer banking.

Photo by cottonbro studio

Share this:

Send Post Twitter LinkedIn Facebook

6 Benchmarks TCH Reached Before FedNow Even Launched

By Julie Muhn (@julieschicktanz) Posted on July 26, 2023
Categories: List series, Thought Leadership

By now you’ve likely heard that the U.S. Federal Reserve launched its FedNow instant payments solution. Using the new tool, banks and credit unions can enable their customers to instantly transfer money at any time of day, any day of the year.

The release comes 10 years after the Fed first started talking about creating a real-time payments (RTP) solution in 2013, and five years after it began developing an RTP offering. The Fed’s instant payments solution also comes after a handful of competing companies in the private sector– including Orum, Visa Direct, and The Clearing House (TCH)— had already launched.

The latter of these– TCH– just released an update that details some of the metrics it has reached in the instant payments realm after launching its RTP network in November of 2017. Here is what the company has achieved in six years:

Increased transaction number

The number of transactions on the RTP network in Q2 2023 totaled 58 million, up from 41 million transactions during that same period last year.

Increased transaction volume

The value of transactions during Q2 2023 reached $29 billion, up from $18 billion in the same quarter last year.

Gained financial institution customers

More than 350 financial institutions are providing real-time payments on the RTP network to their customers and members.

Gained business adoption

150,000 businesses are sending payments over the RTP network. This is a 50% increase since December 2022.

Reached end consumers

3+ million consumers each month are sending account-to-account payments and Zelle payments that leverage the RTP network

Reached demand deposit accounts

The RTP network currently reaches 65% of U.S. demand deposit accounts.

These milestones signify three things. First, they are a reminder to always question claims of “industry firsts.” The launch of FedNow is buzz-worthy because it is a government-led initiative, not because its the first player in the U.S. to enable real-time payments.

Second, TCH’s milestones indicate that consumers are not only conceptually ready for the change, they are open to trusting the process behind the change. “As more banks and credit unions join the RTP network, their customers and members are experiencing the benefits of real-time payments,” said TCH Senior Vice President of RTP Product Management Rusiru Gunasena. “Surpassing 500 million RTP payments signifies the accelerating growth and demand on the RTP network.”

The last thing TCH’s stats demonstrate is that there is still room for a lot of growth in this area. FedNow may not have been the first player to enter the market with an RTP solution, but that’s not to say it won’t be successful. There are currently 57 banks and credit unions planning to participate in FedNow, and Forbes estimates that number will increase to 200 by the end of the year and will reach 500 by the end of next year.

Photo by Hasan Albari

Share this:

Send Post Twitter LinkedIn Facebook

Five Reasons to Look for a Fintech Funding Rebound in the Second Half of 2023

By David Penn Posted on July 19, 2023
Categories: Funding, List series

Stocks might be soaring over the summer. But the headlines of late have been filled with dour reflections over fintech investment in the first half of 2023. The first half of the year – and the second quarter in particular – have been tough on fintechs seeking funding. But here are five reasons why fintech funding in the second half of 2023 – and beyond – is likely to be better than the first half.

The first half was pretty bad

One of the reasons why the second half of the year might see higher levels of fundraising in fintech is because the first half has set a fairly low bar. In its analysis of H1 fintech investment this year, S&P Global Market Intelligence noted that Q2 2023 was the “slowest quarter on record over the past two and a half years” in terms of deal count. In the U.S., H1 funding was down 28% from the previous year. Declines in the U.K. were even more severe, with H1 2023 trailing H1 2022 by a whopping 83%.

S&P Global Market Intelligence was careful to add that while the slowdown in investment impacted the first half significantly, the declines began late last year rather than at the beginning of this year. And while the report writers expressed anxiety over the continued low deal count, the report did note approvingly overall deal value growth, the potential for a stabilization in interest rates, and the underlying robustness of digital trends in financial services as factors that support a recovery in the second half of 2023.

About that recession

Despite layoffs in the tech sector and high-profile tremors in the banking industry like the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank, the widely anticipated recession – and its accompanying 5%+ unemployment rates – has yet to occur in the U.S. or Europe. As economic confidence grows, and the date for a potential economic slowdown gets pushed further into the future by economists, investors are likely to feel more comfortable putting capital at risk.

In addition to the potential for moderation on the interest rate front mentioned above, S&P Global Market Intelligence also highlighted the fact that many venture capitalists remain “flush with cash.” According to Pitchbook, the money available for investment by venture capital is at an all-time high of more than $279 billion for U.S.-based funds alone. That capital will only remain on the sidelines for so long.

Curbed enthusiasm

The popular embrace of emergent GenerativeAI solutions helped give the technology industry writ large a boost at a time when the focus was on shrinking workforces and a sense of stagnation in terms of post-smartphone innovation. At the same time, the strong but relatively muted response to Apple’s metaverse-manifesting VisionPro suggests that market for innovation is still strong, but it may be a little more sober than it’s been in awhile.

This could be a particular benefit for fintech companies where the solutions and services are geared toward clear human challenges in a way that some other areas of technology are not (more on this later). As investors return to the market in search of promising startups, those companies in industries with proven ways of using enabling technologies like automation and machine learning could see early interest.

More tech layoffs, More tech companies

It can be a delicate point. But in the same way that companies like Facebook and YouTube emerged from the wreckage of the dot.com bust, and Airbnb and Uber (and Finovate!) were born out of the ashes of the Great Financial Crisis, one door closing in the economy often signifies the opening of another. The talent that is leaving some of the biggest and most successful technology companies in history is likely to go on to launch and staff the next round of big, successful technology companies. Savvy investors know this, and will be watching to see who ends up where, and what they are up to.

Work the problem, people

One thing that I appreciate about Finovate conferences – and all similar events, to be honest – is that they are a live, in-person reminder that there are people – many of them younger than you and me – who are enthusiastically pursuing solutions to problems in their lives, the lives of their friends and loved ones, as well as the communities they belong to and care about. They tend to not have a lot of time for fear, doubt, or lamentations about what can’t be done. Instead they are more likely to embrace the old motto: lead, follow, or get out of the way.

As long as there individuals who need help sending money to relatives overseas, families struggling to save for the future, businesses looking for ways to make their services both more profitable and available to more customers, there will be fintech innovators building solutions for them. And few people know that better than the investors whose vision and commitment has help make and will continue to help make those solutions possible.

Photo by The Lazy Artist Gallery

Share this:

Send Post Twitter LinkedIn Facebook

5 Tales from the Crypto: Coinbase Partnership Boosts Fortunes of New Bitcoin ETFs

By David Penn Posted on July 5, 2023
Categories: Cryptocurrency, List series

The road to recovery for crypto may be long. And making meaningful headway may require more than a few instances of taking one step back in order to take two steps forward.

Case in point is the latest hurdle faced by BlackRock as the company seeks to launch a spot bitcoin ETF. On Monday, we learned that the Nasdaq refiled the ETF application with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) after the regulator highlighted a number of concerns with regard to the original petition. Among the chief concerns was the fact that the Nasdaq did not indicate which crypto trading platforms would participate in “surveillance-sharing” to help combat fraud in the underlying bitcoin markets.

BlackRock was not the only asset manager to hit this regulatory snag en route to the launch of its bitcoin ETF. The SEC also criticized filings from the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) with regards to a handful of bitcoin ETF petitions from the likes of Fidelity, WisdomTree, VanEck, and a joint project from Invesco and Galaxy – based on similar grounds.

The beneficiary of this hiccup, ironically, appears to be Coinbase, the SEC’s crypto bête noire. In response to the regulator’s concerns, both the Nasdaq and the CBOE indicated in their refilings that they would rely on Coinbase to serve as their “surveillance-sharing” partner. This move both answers one of the primary regulatory concerns vis-a-vis bitcoin ETFs and puts the cryptocurrency innovator back at the center of crypto’s comeback – all this despite the SEC’s antagonistic attitude toward the fintech it filed a lawsuit against in June.

Revolut announced this week that its customers in the U.S. will no longer be able to trade three tokens – Solana (SOL), Cardano (ADA), and Polygon (MATIC). The decision stems from the SEC’s categorization of the three tokens as unregistered securities and the subsequent move by Revolut’s provider, digital asset platform Bakkt, to delist the assets. The delisting will be effective as of September 18th.

Revolut is not the only platform to announced an end to the availability of these tokens for U.S. crypto traders and investors. Both Robinhood and eToro also have either delisted or restricted access to SOL, ADA, and MATIC for U.S. customers. In the case of eToro, tokens such as Algorand (ALGO), Decentraland (MANA), Filecoin (FIL), and Sandbox (SAND) have also been made off-limits for U.S. customers.

Holders of SOL, ADA, and/or MATIC outside the jurisdiction of the SEC will continue to have access to the tokens.

Speaking of “outside the jurisdiction of the SEC,” the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) announced a new set of guidelines designed to help cryptocurrency companies separate customer crypto assets from their own. The new rules insist that digital asset companies that are licensed in Singapore separate customer crypto assets from their own, as well as maintain a separate set of blockchain addresses for customer assets. Companies in the digital payment token business additionally will be required to do daily reconciliation of customers’ digital assets, and maintain accurate records of those assets, as well as access and operational control of customer’s DPTs in Singapore.

The move comes as regulators have become increasingly concerned that cryptocurrency firms have not done enough to “ring-fence” customer crypto assets and keep them segregated from company assets. This problem can be especially acute in the event that a cryptocurrency firm becomes insolvent, making it harder to recover customer funds. The new regulations require cryptocurrency firms to hold customer crypto in trust – though the relative lack of independent, third-party custodians has forced the MAS to offer crypto firms some leniency when it comes to relying on independent custodians at this time. To this end, firms are only required to ensure that crypto custody functions are independent from the firms’ other business operations and divisions.

The new regulations are expected to come online later this year.

A study from Juniper Research from earlier this year indicated that the value of all payment transactions made via stablecoins will top $187 billion by 2028. This represents nearly a 3x gain from 2023 levels. The report, titled CBDCs & Stablecoins: Key Opportunities, Regional Analysis & Market Forecasts 2023-2030, notes the growing use of stablecoins in cross-border transactions, the benefits in terms of speed and traceability that stablecoins offer relative to existing, cross-border rails, and the nature of the competition between stablecoins and central bank digital currencies (CBDCs).

Stablecoins are cryptocurrencies that derive their value from a given fiat currency or commodity. CBDCs are actual digital currencies issued by central banks.

What will it take for stablecoins to reach the transaction levels suggested in the Juniper Research study? Report author Nick Maynard underscored the role of payment platforms and money transfer operators in supporting broader adoption of these digital assets.

“Stablecoins have vast potential to unlock the flow of money across borders, but payment platforms need to roll out acceptance strategies for this to progress,” Maynard observed. “MTOs (Money Transfer Operators) can leverage stablecoins in a wholesale manner, but this will need networks to be built across wide geographic footprints.”

Our last 5 Tales from the Crypto column looked at reasons why the so-called “crypto winter” could see a thaw sooner than many observers think. In a recent column, fintech thought leader and author Chris Skinner shared his thoughts on the resurgent mainstream interest in digital assets.

“Something has changed,” Skinner wrote this week at The Finanser, “and maybe the biggest change is that treasury managers want to use cryptocurrencies. If the customer wants it, then the big banks have to service it and there’s the rub. The big banks have stirred and incorporated digital assets, and specifically cryptocurrencies, into their remit.”

Skinner cited an article at Decrypt.co – Wall Street is coming for crypto, whether early believers like it or not – as well as a June report from S&P Global Ratings titled How DeFi’s Operational Risks Could Influence Credit Quality, that have contributed to his thinking on the topic of late.

“You know that cryptocurrencies are going mainstream when Standard and Poor’s (S&P) start to rate them,” Skinner noted. “They don’t do that today, but they are moving that way.”

Check out the full conversation – as well as the Decrypt.co article and S&P Global Ratings report.

Photo by Alesia Kozik

Share this:

Send Post Twitter LinkedIn Facebook

What Marqeta’s Survey Data Say about the State of Payments

By Julie Muhn (@julieschicktanz) Posted on June 28, 2023
Categories: List series

Marqeta released its 2023 State of Payments report this month. The firm surveyed 4,000 consumers across the U.S., Australia, and the U.K. to gain an understanding of how consumer behavior is shifting and how financial decisions are made.

The data paints a picture of how consumers interact with new and old payment methods. Here are the three main takeaways we gathered.

Consumer adoption of embedded finance is growing… slowly

It’s no secret that embedded finance is one of the biggest trends in the financial services space at the moment. Consumers, however, aren’t ready to race in on this trend. Of the consumers surveyed, less than half (47%) said that they would consider using financial services from a non-financial services provider.

The growth here has been slow. The percentage of people who said they would consider using financial services from a non-financial services provider last year was 45%, only down 2% from those who shared the sentiment this year.

Mobile wallets become less intimidating

One fintech concept consumers are more positive about is mobile wallets. The concept has been around for more than a decade, and mobile wallets and other non-traditional payment methods have finally found a sweet spot with consumers.

In the past year, 80% of survey respondents said they had made a contactless payment, 77% said that they had made a mobile payment, 67% said they had paid using a mobile wallet, and 50% said that they used BNPL to make a payment.

Of the 67% who had used a mobile wallet to make a transaction in the past year, 93% said that it was convenient to use their mobile device to make a payment. This is up from 87% last year, which indicates that either consumers are becoming more savvy, mobile wallets are more user-friendly, or a combination of the two.

Incumbents maintain their footing

With all of this technology, where do banks stand? It turns out, consumers still rely on traditional banks quite a bit. Of those surveyed, 81% said they still use traditional banks. More than half, 56%, have never changed their primary banking provider and 72% said that they are satisfied with their current provider.

This indicates that traditional banks have been able to keep up with consumer expectations, even as society begins to age into the digital era.

Photo by Marc Mueller

Share this:

Send Post Twitter LinkedIn Facebook