Thanks to our NetBanker September Sponsors

We’d like to take a moment to pause in our usual blogging to express
our gratitude to the sponsors that help keep NetBanker free and
high-quality.

Please take a moment to check out our sponsors (listed below, in alphabetical order):

  • Backbase — They’re promoting their fast-to-implement portal software for financial companies including Web 2.0 personalization and online marketing functionality. You can get more information or watch a demo here
  • IntelliResponse — Get a complimentary whitepaper on how self-service via the mobile channel can improve your customer service and benefit your business. Download it now!
  • Intuit — Intuit is promoting their FinanceWorks platform. They’ve got a number of on-demand webinars that are worth checking out. 
  • Murphy & Company — We’re excited to welcome Murphy & Company back as a sponsor in just a few days. Earlier this year, they supported us and promoted their new series of tools
    to help financial institutions comply with the recent changes to
    Regulation E that require “opt-in” consent from consumers before
    charging overdraft fees on certain transactions.
  • MyBankTracker — MBT is a new financial community built by avid fans of the banking world. Check out how they’re innovating at MyBankTracker.com
  • WorkLight — Offering (complimentary) results of a new survey on consumer satisfaction and concerns regarding banking applications for the iPhone, BlackBerry and Android. You can also register for a new free webinar on the Top 10 Enterprise Considerations for Mobile Application Platforms on Tuesday September 21st at 11:30 Eastern Time.
  • Yodlee — They’re currently promoting their demo at our sold-out FinovateFall conference in early October. Thanks, Yodlee, for the plug! We’re excited to have you on stage!

Thanks for taking a moment to check out our sponsors. Please let us know if you ever have any feedback on these companies or our blogging.

P.S. If you want to join these companies in supporting NetBanker, please drop me an email at eric@netbanker.com.


ericphoto.jpgEric Mattson is CEO of Online Financial Innovations, the parent company of NetBanker, Online Banking Report and the Finovate Conference Series. He can be reached at eric@netbanker.com.

Lessons from Chase’s Online Banking Outage

image For much of Tuesday (see note 1), Chase Bank had a message in the upper left corner of its website saying that the website was temporarily unavailable “due to scheduled system maintenance” (screenshot here). Later in the day, the bank finally took that excuse down and merely said that the site is “temporarily unavailable” (see screenshot below and inset).

The outage appears to have afflicted iPhone app users as well. I tried several times and was not able to connect. But, unfortunately, and here’s a new downside for an app compared to a website, there is no way for the bank to warn users within the app that there’s a back-end problem. So users just tried and tried to connect. 

Interestingly, text banking seemed to continue working, at least on the card side. During the outage I was able to retrieve the current balance and available credit via a text message to the bank’s shortcode. That could be an interesting side benefit to text banking, “works if the website is down.”

Lessons for Netbankers: There’s no way to avoid the occasional tech glitch. The important thing is how you handle it. Today’s salient lessons reveal how to communicate during downtime, scheduled or otherwise.

1. Homepage warning: The message on the website is crucial, and Chase does an okay job prominently posting a concise warning on the homepage. Sure, the bank could have been more specific, but when you are in the middle of an IT crisis, there often isn’t a whole lot more that can be said. Still, they were tardy in pulling the “scheduled maintenance” excuse down.

Chase website grade = B-

2. Referrals to other channels: Some of the press reports quoted a Chase spokesperson referring users to the toll-free number as well as ATMs and branches where the systems were apparently working fine. The bank’s website message should also have made those recommendations. Even if live operator support was hopelessly backed up, the bank should admit that and encourage customers to call the toll-free number to check balances and other activity. 

Chase website grade = F

3. Apologize and reassure: From crisis management 101: apologize first, then reassure customers and tell them what you are doing to fix the problem. Chase was doing little of that from what I can see. There was no apology. There was no real explanation. And there was no reassurance that your money was safe. The information void was left to be filled with tweets and blog-post speculation. (15 Sep update: When I logged in today for the first time since the outage, there was no mention of the problem. And oddly, my last login showed as having happened during the middle of the outage. I’m trying to figure out how that could be; perhaps from my attempted iPhone app login?)

Chase website grade = Incomplete (I’m sure it’s coming, but it should have been visible today.)

4. Communications to mobile customers: If the mobile app is also down, you need to proactively send a message to app users explaining the situation. Conversely, if the mobile app or text messaging is working, refer Web customers to those channels.

Chase mobile grade = F (didn’t see that message)

All in all, a bad day for Chase online banking. But a good learning opportunity for everyone else.

————————————–

Chase Bank homepage with “unavailable” message (14 Sep 2010, 3:41 PM Pacific)

Chase Bank homepage with new

Online banking main page with unavailable message (14 Sep 2010, 3:41 PM Pacific)

Chase Bank online banking main page with unavailable message

Note:
1. According to various Twitter messages, Chase online banking went down at about 10 PM Eastern time on Monday, 13 Sep and came back online a few minutes ago (1:45 AM Eastern, 15 Sep, Wed.), a little under 28 hours.

BankSimple May be First Invite-Only Retail Bank Launch

The Bank nightclub, Las VegasI’m not sure what BankSimple told investors, but it worked. The non-bank bank startup grabbed $3 million in VC money last week. The company is positioning itself as a tech company rather than a financial services provider, a smart move for valuations.

imageI finally caught up with co-founder Joshua Reich a few days ago. I came away from that conversation even more impressed. These guys are really trying to reshape the banking experience. They talk more like a credit union than a bank, meaning they are maximizing the customer experience instead of the shareholder one (see note 1).

Granted it hasn’t launched yet, but so far the “better experience” strategy is working wonderfully. The startup has a 20,000-person wait list for an account. Think about that, a waiting list…to join a bank. I never thought I’d write that sentence. If 75% convert to actual customers, BankSimple will have already hit its first-year goal. A nice problem to have.

Graphic from BankSimple website

And the beauty of so-called scarcity marketing is that you can use invite codes as a sort of virtual currency to reward existing customers and other influencers. BankSimple plans to use invite codes to encourage certain unspecified behaviors from existing customers. It’s a page out of the Silicon Valley playbook. Google kept Gmail invite-only for several years. There was a even a time where people paid real money on eBay for a Gmail invite. The same could happen at BankSimple.

Other things I learned:

  • 42% of its prospect base already uses Mint, so BankSimple is content to let someone else handle the heavy lifting in the aggregation space. At launch anyway, they will show activity only with direct BankSimple partners.
  • As previously reported, the bank is committed to mobile remote deposit. They’ve spent considerable time working the kinks out of that. They even looked at extending the concept to bill payment, allowing users to simply scan bills and have them automatically paid; however, too many tech problems surfaced, so the effort has been shelved.
  • Focused on real-time everything. They may be the first bank (at least in the United States) to have everything they do occur in real time. They think that will greatly reduce customer service headaches and expense.

Notes:
1. But clearly BankSimple is no nonprofit. The VCs are there because they smell a 10x return, not because they don’t like banking fees.
2. Photo credit: The Bank nightclub in Las Vegas.
3. Previous posts on BankSimple here.

ActivePath Named OBR Best of the Web for Email Banking System

obr_bestofweb In our most recent report, Email Banking: Revitalizing the Channel, ActivePath was named the third OBR Best of the Web winner in 2010. The company was cited for its unique plugin software that turns the user’s email inbox into a mini online-banking center.

We believe that the future of banking information delivery is outside the website. Increasingly, users will rely on information pushed to them through Facebook, Twitter or RSS feeds, to mobile phone apps, and to the email inbox. ActivePath’s solution plays into that trend.

The just-launched Israeli startup becomes the 78th company to win the designation since we began awarding it in 1997. The other two winners this year:

———————-

Note: OBR Best of the Web awards are given periodically to companies that pioneer new online or mobile banking features. It is not an endorsement of the company or product, just recognition for what we believe is an important industry development. Recent winners are profiled in the Netbanker archives.

Last Chance for FinovateFall 2010 Early-Bird Tickets!

FinovateFall_wdate_web.gif

We’re only a few weeks from FinovateFall (October 4-5 in NYC) and we are incredibly excited!

Like any event, a great Finovate is built on two important factors — awesome presenters and a great audience.

We’ve already told you about the 56 cutting-edge fintech companies that will be doing demos of their latest and greatest innovations.

And, as we get close to the early-bird ticket deadline, the audience is shaping up just as strongly, with executives from companies like:

  • AARP
  • BB&T
  • CIBC
  • CitiBank
  • Grupo Santander
  • Intuit
  • Money Magazine
  • Rabobank
  • The Associated Press
  • US Banker
  • American Express
  • Bank of New Zealand
  • Capital One
  • CNNMoney
  • FirstBank
  • Mastercard
  • PayPal
  • Reuters
  • Tower Group
  • Visa
  • Bank of America
  • CBS MoneyWatch
  • Chase Card Services
  • Discover
  • Forbes
  • Microsoft
  • RBC Venture Partners
  • TD Bank
  • USAA
  • Wall Street Journal

Over the show’s two days, attendees will get to watch the future of fintech and banktech unfold on stage via fast-paced demos (28 new innovations each day) from dozens of innovative companies. And then have a chance to interact with top executives from each of the demo companies during intimate networking sessions.

If you’re interested in attending the conference, registering now will save you $100 on your ticket via the early-bird discount (ends TODAY, September 10) and reserve your spot (space is limited and we’re expecting to sell out). We’ll see you in New York!


ericphoto.jpg

Eric Mattson is CEO of Online Financial Innovations, the parent company of NetBanker, Online Banking Report and the Finovate Conference Series. He can be reached at eric@netbanker.com.

Last Chance for FinovateFall 2010 Early-Bird Tickets!

FinovateFall_wdate_web.gif

We’re only a few weeks from FinovateFall (October 4-5 in NYC) and we are incredibly excited!

Like any event, a great Finovate is built on two important factors — awesome presenters and a great audience.

We’ve already told you about the 56 cutting-edge fintech companies that will be doing demos of their latest and greatest innovations.

And, as we get close to the early-bird ticket deadline, the audience is shaping up just as strongly, with executives from companies like:

  • AARP
  • BB&T
  • CIBC
  • CitiBank
  • Grupo Santander
  • Intuit
  • Money Magazine
  • Rabobank
  • The Associated Press
  • US Banker
  • American Express
  • Bank of New Zealand
  • Capital One
  • CNNMoney
  • FirstBank
  • Mastercard
  • PayPal
  • Reuters
  • Tower Group
  • Visa
  • Bank of America
  • CBS MoneyWatch
  • Chase Card Services
  • Discover
  • Forbes
  • Microsoft
  • RBC Venture Partners
  • TD Bank
  • USAA
  • Wall Street Journal

Over the show’s two days, attendees will get to watch the future of fintech and banktech unfold on stage via fast-paced demos (28 new innovations each day) from dozens of innovative companies. And then have a chance to interact with top executives from each of the demo companies during intimate networking sessions.

If you’re interested in attending the conference, registering now will save you $100 on your ticket via the early-bird discount (ends TODAY September 10th) and reserve your spot (space is limited and we’re expecting another sellout). We’ll see you in New York!


ericphoto.jpgEric Mattson is CEO of Online Financial Innovations, the parent company of NetBanker, Online Banking Report and the Finovate Conference Series. He can be reached at eric@netbanker.com.

Wal-Mart Sells Paper-Check Fraud Protection for Just $1.95 per Box

imageNaturally, we use online payments as much as possible both at home and in our business. But even so, we still go through a box or two of old-school paper checks every year.

Running low on business checks, I today logged in to my bank to order a box. Unfortunately, it does not support online reordering of business checks, only personal ones. I was referred to a toll-free number. But rather than go through an unknown phone ordering process, I went back to WalmartChecks.com (note 1), a service from Wal-Mart that I had tested many years ago.

imageThe reordering process was drop-dead simple: Just click Quick Reorder on the homepage, type the bank’s routing number, account number, and beginning check number, then make a few selections from the menus, and press reorder. It takes all of about 60 to 90 seconds. You don’t even have to input payment info, because the total is simply deducted from your checking account.

But the reason for this post is to highlight the interesting cross-sale made during the reordering process. For $1.95 per box, Wal-Mart offers a check-fraud protection service called EZ Shield from a company of the same name, a recent spin-off from printed-check marketer, Custom Direct (CDI). I was pitched the product through a yellow-highlighted box in the middle of the order-confirmation screen (see first screenshot below).

I wasn’t sure what it was, so I clicked on More Details to learn that EZ Shield reimburses users for fraudulent use of the checks in the box (see second screenshot). The service provides coverage of up to $25,000 total if one or more of the 200 checks is altered, stolen from the payee and deposited, or used with a forged signature. The EZ Shield logo is printed on the checks to remind users that they are protected.

Bottom line: While paper-check fraud is not a major concern to me, I still value the small improvement in peace of mind I get for just $1.95. And for Wal-Mart, the $1.95 was a 28% revenue lift to a $6.96 box of checks. More importantly, the value-add makes it more likely I’ll be a repeat customer even when my bank eventually enables online check reordering.

WalmartChecks.com shopping card with EZ Shield cross sales (9 Sep 2010)

image

Popup explanation of EZ Shield (link)

image

Note:
1. According to Compete, the check-ordering site gets about 150,000 unique visitors per month and traffic has been relatively flat the past year.

How to Do a Great Demo #3 — Let Your Product Have the Stage

This is a guest post from John Fishback of 154 Consulting, the firm that helps us coach the innovative fintech companies selected for Finovate on their demos.

Titling this post was difficult. 
“Actually demonstrate your product,” “Remember why your company
exists,” and, most simply, “Don’t read a script” were all in contention.

The
titling difficulties were because this post focuses on how to avoid
some of the problems that plague less successful Finovate demos —
those that lose the audience early or leave them wondering why the
presenting company came to the conference. 

The
classic examples are those demos that feature a presenter using their
seven minutes to give a short speech about the industry or about the
history of their company, only occasionally rambling near to what’s
being shown on the screen, and stopping only when they reach their time
limit and their microphone is mercifully cut off.

At
the other extreme, and almost as difficult for the audience, are the
presenters that are so worried about their time and message that they
read closely from an over-worked script, leaving the Finovate
auditorium feeling stuffy and dull.

These two problems feel very different. But they come from the same root cause, and can be addressed by the same three tactics.

The
root cause of both problems is that the presenter failed to let the
product tell its story. If your product is compelling enough to have
been selected for Finovate, there is something about it that will move
the audience. Putting that powerful thing, rather than your view of
the industry or even the details of your company, center stage is the
first step towards a solid demo.

To
keep your demo compelling, use these three tactics: get right to the
product, explain the customer’s problem, and use good scripting. 
Get right to the product: 
Continuity Control LogoContinuity
Control got this right
at Finovate this spring in San Francisco. CEO Andy
Greenawalt did a great job of putting his product in context, and then
got right to the demo. Compliance is a complex and inflammatory issue;
he could have spent three or four minutes framing out the challenge. 
But he didn’t. He started showing off the product, and wove detail
about his customers’ challenges throughout the demo. 
As
a rule of thumb, if you are spending more than a minute
talking before you direct the audience’s focus to the screen, you
should do some hard thinking about whether any portions of your
introduction could be built into other parts of your demo.
Explain the customer’s problem
expensifylogo.pngThe
worst demos show amazing technology that’s hunting for a problem to
solve. The best demos help the audience understand a customer problem
and demonstrate how the product solves that problem.

Expensify’s
FinovateSpring 2010 demo
centers around the manager that
approves expenses. CEO David Barrett explains the frustrations of the
approving manager, and then shows how Expensify’s whiz-bang technology
makes those frustrations disappear.

Use good scripting

I’d
like to be very clear on this. Carrying a word-for-word speech text
onto the stage at Finovate is a bad idea. Nothing will kill audience
interest more than your reading from the page in front of you.

At the same time, thinking through what you are going to say is crucially important.

To
break the compromise, start by thinking about the customer’s problem –
solving that situation is why your company exists. Then choose the key screens you
need to show from your product to explain how you solve that problem.

For
each screen, you need to do three things: navigate the audience to the
screen, describe what they see on the screen, and then explain the
importance or meaning of what they’ve seen.  For example, you might say
“Let’s look at our login screen” (navigate), “Here customers enter
their username and password” (describe), “We do this because everyone
else in the entire world does login this way, so it is familiar to the
customer” (importance/meaning). 

BilleoLogo.gifA better example of this kind of scripting is the Billeo demo from FinovateFall 2009. CEO Murali Subbarao
consistently directs our attention to the screen, describes what’s
happening, and then tells us why the functionality Billeo provides
makes customers’ lives easier.

Scripting
in this way ensures that the product remains the audience’s main focus
and prevents you from wandering off topic, while avoiding over-scripted
stuffiness.

(There
are exceptions to the rule. iPay technologies did a great job of
showing how their product works through a tightly scripted demo, but
they put in a great deal of rehearsal time to make that work, and the
script remained focused on the customer problem.)

For
Finovate demos, it is the product that matters most. Failing to put
the product first creates a variety of problems, and is the shared
characteristic of the least effective demos. Successful demos follow
many different approaches, but all focus clearly on the presenter’s
product.


JTFHeadshot.jpg

This is a guest post from John Fishback. John is the principal of 154 Consulting and directs 154’s Financial Services Product Group, which combines message development and presentation advice services with financial services industry experience to help financial services companies, startups, and vendors develop and market products that speak clearly to customers’ needs. He can be reached at john@154consulting.com.

The 49% Text Banking Gap

image Quick. What comes to mind when you envision mobile banking? I’m guessing most of you pictured a mobile website or shiny new app running on a recent iPhone, Blackberry, Android or other smartphone.

And if mobile banking was used only by techies, that would be about right. But banking is used by just about everyone, and everyone still doesn’t have a smartphone and Internet data plan.

According to the latest study out of Pew Internet (note 1), 82% of U.S. adults have a cell phone (and another 6% of the total live in a household where someone else owns one). And 72% of those cell phone owners use text messaging while only 38% access the Internet through their phone.

And only 60% of the mobile-Internet users, or 23% of all cell phone users, are frequent users, accessing the Internet 3 or more times per week (note 2). 

So the text-banking gap is 49% (72 less 23) or half of all cell phone users. Those are the people that use text messaging but do not regularly access the Internet through their phones. Another way to think of it, the non-Internet-using segment is more than twice the size of the mobile-Internet-using group. Or more simply, text users outnumber (frequent) mobile Internet users 3 to 1. 

Bottom line: Don’t overlook the mainstream text-message group for both alerts and balance inquiries. And make sure your marketing and educational material speaks to the sizable segment that could care less about your new iPhone app and just wants to know how to txt for their bal. 

Notes
1. Adult data compiled via telephone interviews in May 2010. N = 2,252. Teen data is from a year ago in a telephone survey of 800 teens (age 12-17) fielded June through Sept. 2009.
image2. In comparison, text-message usage is crazy high (see eMarketer graph of the Pew Internet data inset). According to the Pew data, adult (18+) text-message users send/receive almost 40 text messages a day. Of course, that’s nothing compared to the thumb-weary, under-18 crowd who send/receive an average of 110 messages per day. Side note: The wording on the question asks for the number of messages sent AND received, so one exchange, text out and reply back, should only count as one message. But I’m guessing respondents are thinking of this more as “sent OR received” so that each exchange counts as two messages. I also suspect the kids are over-estimating their usage quite a bit, wanting to wow the researchers with their uber-connectedness. But the bottom line is the same: Teens have embraced texting, and adults have caught the bug as well.   
3. For more info on mobile banking, see our mobile banking series in Online Banking Report.

Friday Musings: Amazon.com Should Buy Barnes & Noble and Partner with a Direct Bank

image One of the best things to happen in 20 years of living in northeast Seattle was the opening of Barnes & Noble in our local shopping center, replacing the tired old department store, Lamonts

For this family of readers, the massive, two-store B&N has continued to be a cherished destination for more than a decade. When the boys were young, it was Tuesday night story time (with free fresh-baked chocolate-chip cookies). Later, it was a place to spend their birthday money on new books, music and DVDs. And I’ve personally bought at least a couple hundred items there over the years. 

But I’m also an Amazon.com fanatic and buy most everything I can there nowadays. My wife and I (though not the boys yet) are ebook addicts, reading on our iThings via the Kindle app (note 1).  So, I’m more than a little concerned about our neighborhood Barnes & Noble. Printed books and other media, along with CDs/DVDs, are on their way out, so is there any hope of keeping the neighborhood B&N in business?  

Musing 1: B&N Rescued by Amazon.com
Here’s my dream: Amazon buys Barnes & Noble, perhaps partnering with a major financial services brand (note 2), and turns it into a fully online/mobile channel-integrated super store. Amazon’s major online departments could be recreated within the massive B&N footprint: the book store, of course, electronics, music, movies/TV, toys, home and garden, shoes, and so on.

High-volume goods would be stocked and available for purchase. Consumers could also pick up goods ordered via online/mobile enabling same-day delivery for many items. But the main focus of the store would be self-service online shopping. Shoppers in the shoe department, for example, could see and hold various styles, but would place an order through a mobile app or online kiosk, to get their specific size delivered to the store or their home. The concept would be to showcase a wide variety of items without incurring the costs of holding massive inventory within the store.

Musing 2: Amazon Financial Centers Installed within the Super Stores
Though I’m not a huge fan of branches, they still have their place. Amazon could turn a corner of the store into a financial services center. The center would feature deposit-taking ATMs to handle those pesky checks and would have a financial specialist or two on hand to help customers with mortgages and other high-touch financial needs (no transaction activity, however).

Financial center staffers could also be incented to help drive users to co-branded Amazon loyalty programs with online and in-store sales diverted from credit cards to ACH/debit, saving the company tens of millions in annual interchange. Financing big-ticket items could also create a massive new revenue stream for the retailer.   

While the financial operations could be private-branded under the Amazon name (e.g., Sears), it would probably make more sense to partner with a major direct financial services company such as ING Direct, Citibank, or Schwab, or an international giant such as Standard Chartered, Barclays, or OCBC which would gain a major footprint in the United States with 700+ strategically located mini-branches (notes 3, 4).

It’s not going to happen, Amazon is a Wall St. darling as a pure-play ecommerce company, but for the sake of the neighborhood, I wish it would.

————————————————-

Notes on the the business case (see huge caveat, note 5): 
In this simplistic proposal, I’m ignoring a zillion issues which are beyond the scope of this blog. For example, would existing B&N leases even support Amazon’s product mix? But to an outsider, it looks enticing for the following reasons.

  • B&N is currently valued at less than $900 million and change after a recent run-up after it announced that it was for sale (note 6). In comparison, Amazon’s is worth $62 billion today. As a matter of fact, its market cap has grown $7 bil since I started this post a couple weeks ago, enough to buy seven Barnes & Nobles. Clearly, Amazon could afford it, though whether shareholders would support it is another matter.
  • Merging with B&N would take out one of Amazon’s major competitors, theoretically allowing the company to boost prices. With $25 billion in revenues, a quarter-percent (25-basis point) price increase at Amazon would add $60 million to the bottom line.
  • In-store pickups could help reduce Amazon’s massive shipping expense. 
  • And while B&N isn’t currently generating a profit, it was operating cash-flow positive during the past 12 months (+$120 million).
  • Amazon could partner with other direct commerce companies to spread the risk. The financial services mini-stores alone could bring in $100 million annually assuming a $10,000 per month rent/rev share per location (note 3). And other retailers might also be interested in mini-stores within the big Amazon box: Microsoft, Dell, Sony, HP, Drugstore.com, and so on.   

Other notes:
1. While I consume almost all fiction digitally, I still like to buy printed business books to keep on the reference shelf. I find it easier to remember they exist that way. Even my semi-Luddite brother has jumped on the Kindle bandwagon at the new $139 price point.  
2. I mostly added this to justify posting it here. Ironically, this strategy is almost the polar opposite of our Online Banking Report: Creating the Amazon.com of Financial Services originally published in 1998 then updated in 2000 (more recent summary here). 
3. I’m not including another 600+ B&N locations on college campuses, because many of those would not be a good fit for financial services and/or the schools would not allow a competing financial provider on campus.
4. Adding financial stores to Barnes & Noble retail locations could be problematic if the leases prohibit banking operations due to exclusive deals with other banks in the shopping center.
5. Caveat: Although I do have an MBA, my balance-sheet reading skills are quite rusty. And I don’t have an ounce of retailing experience (outside banking), so please realize this is primarily conjecture on my part. 
6. There’s also another billion in long-term debt and other obligations.

Gmail’s New Priority Inbox Should Inspire Banks to Do the Same with Electronic Statements

image I’ve been on a bit of a campaign this summer (writing in Online Banking Report here and here), about the need to move beyond the static online “data dump” model to a more measured approach in delivering precise financial info when and where the customer needs it. 

We mostly looked at outbound messaging and streaming systems: email, text, RSS and third-parties such as Blippy and Swipely. But the same logic can be used to improve the financial home base, the online statement.

Google’s new email option, Priority Inbox (aka Magic Inbox), introduced to Gmail users this week (note 1), is a great example of how this could work. Instead of always displaying email (or transactions) in chronologic or reverse-chronologic order, use algorithms to show items in order of importance (see screenshot below).

The bank-transaction importance-ranking would obviously include the size of the item. But it would also position unusual payments of any size at the top of the list so that users could more quickly identify fraud or errors. And, as with Gmail, users should be able to label and flag transactions for future reference (note 2).

A service like this would have saved me hundreds of dollars this year, by alerting me immediately that my cell phone bill had mushroomed, and that I needed to switch to an unlimited-minutes plan.

Gmail Priority Inbox (1 Sep 2010)
Note: There are no messages in the top priority area called “Important and unread” because I’d read them all. Google provides a little note of congratulations for clearing out that portion of the inbox.

Gmail priority inbox is a good model for online banking and credit card statements

Notes:
1. Google has offered similar algorithm-based ordering in its RSS reader for some time. I’ve been using it for almost a year and am a big fan. It really helps lift the best posts to the top of the 600 or so I get each day. I will use Twitter a lot more when it offers the same type of functionality (Does anyone know of a Twitter client that arranges tweets by importance?)  
2. And like Google, banking users should be able to store their transactions for as long as they are customers. See our Online Banking Report on Lifetime Statements for more info.

Rearranging the Deck Chairs on the Titanic Branch

imageToday’s Financial Brand post by Jeffry Pilcher is the best article I’ve ever read on branch design. If you are building or remodeling mega-branches, it’s an absolute must-read.

But as I read it, I couldn’t help thinking about that old saying about the deck chairs on the Titanic. Sure, IF valuable customers continue to visit branches, and IF those customers are willing to be pitched products as they rush through their errands, and IF you train/compensate your staff to effectively sell, and IF you can still afford the half-mil or more it costs to run each one, then by all means build U-shaped branches to maximize sales interactions, hire world-class greeters, and install engaging merchandising displays along the snaking path to the teller windows in the back.

imageBut no matter how many design awards your branch receives, it won’t change the megatrend: the future of financial services is outside the branch. Nearly every profitable business line is already sold direct: credit cards, prepaid cards, insurance, mutual funds/investments, car loans, mortgages, commercial loans, and, more recently, even savings/CDs and checking accounts.

And now that ATMs, PC scanners and mobile phones handle deposit-taking better than the friendliest teller (note 1), the traditional branch has no business case. Sure, spacious and attractive branches in high-traffic areas are great imagemarketing tools. They reinforce your brand, show your stability, and I’ll have to admit, they are mighty convenient for dropping off paper checks and getting free cookies.

But that model is too expensive. I agree with Mr. Pilcher that branches are far from dead. But the future branch is likely to look more like an Edward Jones or Allstate office, not the thing of beauty shown here. There may even be more of them (Edward Jones tallies more than 10,000), but they won’t look like these pictures. 

The bank/CU branch will morph into small storefronts sprinkled throughout the community staffed with a few people heavily incented to produce revenue. Routine transactions will be handled by (mostly) self-service ATM/kiosks. Unlike the Titanic, the sinking of the mega-branch model will be slow. And the ultimate brick-and-mortar mix will be much more complicated than my simplistic take on it here. But branches will shrink, tellers will be phased out, and the online/email/mobile channels will handle just about everything. Just ask USAA

Notes:
1. Remote/ATM deposit capture is superior to most teller-assisted deposits because you not only save a trip to the branch, but also get immediate real-time confirmation that the deposit has been properly recorded. You can make the deposit earlier (as soon as you receive the check), you get a copy of the image to store indefinitely, and in the case of remote capture, you can even hold on to the original check as proof of deposit.
2. We wrote about the Demise of the Branch in 2006 (OBR subscription required).  
3. Photo credits: EHS Design.