Full FinovateEurope 2011 Demo Roster Finally Revealed
With FinovateEurope only 11 days away, it’s finally time to reveal the full roster of 36 companies that will be demoing their latest financial technology innovations on stage in London.
The companies are geographically diverse (coming from across Europe, North America and Asia) as well as diverse in the areas that they’re innovating on (everything from online banking to security to marketing to online identity to ecommerce to investing to PFM to payments).
On February 1st, 2011, the following companies (HQ locations in parentheses) will take the stage in London along with our guest host Chris Skinner:
|
|
These companies will be showcasing their innovations to an audience of over 400 executives from companies like Santander, AXA, RBS, RBC, Lloyds, Deutsche Bank, PayPal, Forrester, CIBC, TSYS, Microsoft, Accel Partners, Rabobank, ING, Barclays, BBVA, Standard Chartered, PostFinance, Raiffeisenbank, Yahoo!Finance, WSJ Europe and Celent.
Sadly, the conference is now sold out. If you’d like to be added to the wait list, please email us at [email protected]. If you’d like to follow our live twitter stream of the action on the day of the event, please follow @NetBanker and @Finovate.
FinovateEurope 2011 is sponsored by: BlueRock Consulting, Microsoft, Sapient, Santander, The Bancorp & Walker Morris
FinovateEurope 2011 is partners with: 154 Consulting, BankerStuff, BankInnovation.net, CardWeb, Banking Automation Bulletin, Finance on Windows, The Financial Services Innovation Centre, Mercator Advisory Group, PYMNTS.com & theStartup.eu.
Full FinovateEurope 2011 Demo Roster Finally Revealed
With FinovateEurope only 11 days away, it’s finally time to reveal the full roster of 36 companies that will be demoing their latest financial technology innovations on stage in London.
The companies are geographically diverse (coming from across Europe, North America and Asia) as well as diverse in their areas of innovation (everything from online banking to security to marketing to online identity to ecommerce to investing to PFM to payments).
On February 1, 2011, the following companies (HQ locations in parentheses) will take the stage in London along with our guest host Chris Skinner:
|
|
These companies will be showcasing their innovations to an audience of more than 400 executives from companies like Santander, AXA, RBS, RBC, Lloyds, Deutsche Bank, PayPal, Forrester, CIBC, TSYS, Microsoft, Accel Partners, Rabobank, ING, Barclays, BBVA, Standard Chartered, PostFinance, Raiffeisenbank, Yahoo!Finance, WSJ Europe and Celent.
Sadly, the conference is now sold out. If you’d like to be added to the wait list, please email us at [email protected]. If you’d like to follow our live twitter stream of the action on the day of the event, please follow @NetBanker and @Finovate.
FinovateEurope 2011 is sponsored by: BlueRock Consulting, Microsoft, Sapient, Santander, The Bancorp & Walker Morris
FinovateEurope 2011 is partners with: 154 Consulting, BankerStuff, BankInnovation.net, CardWeb, Banking Automation Bulletin, Finance on Windows, The Financial Services Innovation Centre, Mercator Advisory Group, PYMNTS.com & theStartup.eu.
Chase Bank Uses QR Code in Homepage Banner
Here’s the first time I’ve seen a QR code used on a bank’s homepage. After an animation sequence (below) announcing Chase Bank’s new Android mobile banking app, the final graphic displays a code that Android smartphone users can scan to download the new app. Very clever.
Chase Bank homepage (20 Jan. 2011)
Landing page (link)
Animation graphic 1:
Animation graphic 2:
Animation graphic 3:
Self-Service: Bank of America’s MyFraudProtection Allows Online Review of Suspicious Card Transactions
The reason bank call centers still field millions of calls from online banking customers is that most account problems cannot be solved online. It’s not that banks don’t have the technology or the business case, it’s just a priorities challenge. Effective self-service modules are time consuming to build, test and integrate, while employee and customer education pose an even bigger hurdle.
But slowly, as more and more consumers look to resolve issues with a mouse click or finger flick, financial institutions will add self-service troubleshooting wizards to online/mobile banking.
The latest example comes from Bank of America.
I’ve been a BofA cardholder for the better part of two decades, and every year spend an hour or so verifying flagged transactions via phone with bank-fraud reps. It’s an annoying, but necessary, part of making 50 to 100 charges every month for home and business.
But my most recent experience was very different. When I went online to pay the bill, not realizing (but suspicious) that my card had been cut off, I was greeted with the following message underneath the card balance on the main Account Overview page (see screenshot 1):
Online access is not available for this account. Please go to
www.myfraudprotection.com and verify recent transactions. Or you may call
1-800-427-2449 for additional information.
_____________________________________________________________
How it works
______________________________________________________________________
Step 1: Following the link, I ended up at an entirely new site, running outside online banking where I was required to re-enter my account number (screen 2), last 4 of SSN, Zip, and phone number (see screen 3).
Step 2: I was then required to answer random questions pulled from the credit bureau to authenticate myself (screen 4).
Step 3: Finally, I was able to review and approve the transactions in question (screen 5). I was then thanked and told I could use my card again (screen 6).
However, after all this, I was still not able to pay my account online and had to call after all. The rep told me that it takes between two and 24 hours for online banking access to become available (note 1).
______________________________________________________________
Analysis
_______________________________________________________________________
All-in-all, I liked the system. However, it needs to be more integrated into online banking (see note 2). Given all the extra work required to authenticate myself, it would have been faster just to call the 800-number. If I were a normal customer, that’s what I’d do next time. I hate the stress of going through the authentication process: With everything on autopay, who can remember their exact payment amounts anymore?
And worse, there is a security disconnect here. I log in to my credit card account only to be told it’s unavailable and that I should log in to some site I’ve never heard of (that doesn’t even have a Bank of America URL, note 3) and turn over personal info. It looks more like a crude phishing ploy than something from a major bank. And as far as I can recall, there was no customer education on this process.
So, I applaud Bank of America for making transaction verification self-service. But there’s still much work to be done before it replaces the phone process.
1. Main Bank of America Account Overview screen (14 Jan. 2011)
2. First screen at MyFraudProtection.com (link, note 2)
3. Step 2 of 3 of authentication process
4. Step 3 of 3 of authentication process
6. Confirmation message (and survey invitation)
———————————-
Notes:
1. This was the weekend that BofA was having website trouble, so it may not always be delayed.
2. I realize the bank is using the fraud-protection site as a standalone system so it can direct any cardholder to it without first needing to log in to online banking, hence the authentication requirement. But for logged-in bofa.com users, it seems unnecessary. Although it does provide an extra measure of security, in case the cardholders’ online access had been breeched by the person attempting to use the card, that extra security comes at too high of a usability cost, in my opinion.
3. The www.fraudprotection.com URL does redirect to myfraudprotection.bankofamerica.com, which helps.
Alumni News — Week of January 9, 2011
Google Launches More Financial Product Comparison Pages: Savings Accounts, Checking, CDs, and Mortgages
Today, I ran into Google’s new savings-account comparison chart for the first time (see notes 1, 2 and screenshot below, link). The search giant now offers separate pages with financial product comparisons for mortgages, credit cards, CDs, checking, and savings accounts. And the comparison matrices are at times positioned prominently on searches potentially reducing traffic to top advertisers and to organic results as well (see screenshot below).
Savings account search results
Let’s look at an example search today for “savings accounts.” The results include a blue-chip lineup of paid advertisers. Following is a list of the top 10 paid results compared to their position on the Google comparison page (note 3):
1. American Express (#1)
2. ING Direct (#7)
3. US Bank (#24, 30, 32, 33)
4. BECU (local advertiser)
5. Citibank (#19, 25, 26 )
6. Capital One (#10, 15, 31)
7. Navy Federal CU
8. TD Ameritrade
9. Zions Bank (#4, 5, 22, 23, 27)
10. Discover Bank (#2, 11)
Analysis
I still don’t understand why Google would risk antagonizing its financial advertisers by drawing traffic away from their ads and into the Google-powered comparison matrix. The company says its focus is on the user experience. So I guess they believe that long-term this approach will generate more traffic, more searches and ultimately more revenue, possibly from commissions for actual accounts generated, rather than just pay-per-click.
But in its current beta stage, there are some odd results. How would you feel if you are US Bank, bidding high enough to be number three on the search results page, but not shown until page three of the savings-account comparison page? Worse, three top-10 advertisers, BECU, Navy Federal CU, and TD Ameritrade aren’t even listed on the savings comparison page.
Which brings up a bigger question. How does Google determine which FIs are listed? The savings-product comparison indexes only 17 banks, of which five aren’t even playing the rate game at this point with rates of 0.25% or less (note 4). Furthermore, there’s not a single credit union and just one smaller bank (Bank of Internet) listed.
I understand this is just a trial balloon from Google and that product comparisons could make it easier for users to find the best rate. But right now it’s unfair to any financial institution not in the chosen 17, and it doesn’t allow users to easily choose from criteria other than rate, monthly fee, and whether a branch is nearby.
It also looks like the system could be gamed. What’s to prevent one of these banks from launching ten, or 20 or 30 different savings accounts, all with temporary teaser rates, to soak up more space in the matrix?
Sure, Google will eventually build algorithms to prevent that, but that will take time. Meanwhile, it’s an odd transition time for the search engine and its financial advertisers. But if you rely at all on Google to deliver new customers, you better pay close attention to developments with its product-comparison pages.
Google search for “savings accounts” (12 Jan. 2011, 4:00 PM Pacific, Seattle IP address)
Google’s “savings” comparison page
Offer details page for American Express High-Yield Savings
———————————
Notes:
1. According to MyBankTracker.com, Google started running the deposit-account comparisons in late December 2010 in the U.S. market.
2. We wrote about Google’s credit card comparison matrix in November.
3. Google’s savings-account matrix listed a total of 44 results, from 17 unique banks, displayed 10 per page
4. 14 of the 44 results, almost one-third of the matrix, were accounts paying 10 basis points or less.
USAA Promotes Teen Checking Accounts
In doing some initial research for a report we are planning for Q1 on “family bank accounts,” I started where I usually do, on Google. The only financial institution advertising specifically on the term “teen banking” was USAA (see note 1).
The top-of-the-page ad led to a well-designed landing page devoted to Teen Checking (see screenshots below) with a clever call to action:
We won’t take any of your teen’s allowance.
Teen checking without hidden fees.
USAA even has a dedicated site with its own URL to support its youth-banking efforts: https://my.usaa.com
Relevance for NetBankers: Teenagers may be one of the most lucrative segments to attract to your financial institution. They not only spend billions themselves, but also could literally stick with you for a lifetime.
The thinking goes something like this:
- Attracting the children of your customers helps you retain the parents
- Retaining the parents helps you retain the kids as they become young adults
- Young adults become parents
- Repeat
This didn’t work so well in the old branch-based world because one of the first things the kids did when they moved away was open a checking account at the closest branch to their new apartment or dorm room. In an online/mobile-centric world, that no longer has to happen.
Google search for “teen banking” (see note 1; search conducted at 5:00 PM on 11 Jan. 2011 from Seattle IP address)
USAA’s “Teen Checking” landing page
Notes:
1. First-page organic results included (note, search was limited to items posted in past month)
— Fremont FCU
— North Shore Bank
— Coast Hills FCU
— U.S. Bank (Visa Buxx)
— S.T.A.R Community Credit Union
— American Riviera Bank (my new favorite bank name)
2. If anyone wants to point out great examples of teen/youth/family banking efforts, please drop me an email [email protected] or leave it in the comments. Thanks.
Another Promising Mobile App that Does Away with Paper: Intuit’s SnapTax
I meandered into Intuit’s lab site today and ran across a nifty app released last year called TurboTax SnapTax. It allowed California residents to file simple tax returns by photographing their W-2 form, answering a few questions, then e-filing directly from the iPhone app (inset).
As you can see in the following video, the whole process could be completed in a few minutes. The app launched last year on Jan. 15, just in time for the 2010 tax season. The cost was $9.99 which included Federal and state e-filing.
There’s no word yet on whether the company will be releasing a 2011 version (update: it launches Jan. 13, 2011 and is good in all 50 states). There is no entry in the iTunes store for SnapTax as of today. However, Intuit does have two tax tools available: TaxCaster to estimate your refund and MyTaxRefund to track it.
Analysis: The Intuit app is part of a trend we expect to continue, using smartphone cameras to capture, store, and eliminate the need to store paper receipts and statements. And like Mitek’s Mobile Photo Bill Pay, Intuit’s Snaptax is much more than a dumb scanner. It takes the scan, reads the info, and assists in completing the transaction.
Opportunity for NetBankers: It’s probably too late for 2011 tax season, but if you can be the first one in your market to offer mobile-photo tax-prep next year, it should provide a healthy PR boost come April 2012. You might also consider offering a tax estimator and/or refund tracker to your mobile offering.
Alumni News — Week of January 2, 2011
Unitus Community Credit Union Charging $2 Monthly for Geezeo-Powered Online Financial Management (PFM)
In what I believe is a first in the United States, a financial institution has begun charging a small fee for online personal financial management (PFM) services.
Portland, OR-based Unitus Community Credit Union, with 68,000 members and $800 million in assets, launched its new Geezeo-powered PFM Total Finance in late 2010. Members pay $2 per month for the service following a 30-day free trial.
According to Laurie Kresl, VP planning & biz development at Unitus, the CU has 661 members signed up for the service as of this week, or about 1% of its member base, which is a solid start considering the monthly fee is not mentioned on the public website, but is disclosed as members sign up for the service (note 1).
Quick take: While online/mobile access will remain relatively fee-free, we’ll begin to see more fees for optional value-added services such as advanced financial management. Congratulations to Unitus for taking the lead on this one.
Unitus CU homepage features its new PFM offering (6 Jan. 2011)
PFM landing page (link)
Note:
1. To sign up, customers first log in to online banking. The CU says it plans to add fine print to the landing page (above), disclosing the monthly fee.
Wells Fargo Remodels its Mobile Website, WF.com
I just realized that I haven’t posted anything about non-app-based mobile websites (aka WAP) since the pre-iPhone days of early 2007, when I tried unsuccessfully to log in to ING Direct’s mobile site through my trusty Samsung Blackjack.
Mobile banking has come a long way since then, primarily through native apps, now supported by more than 1,000 financial institutions in the U.S. alone. But a mobile-optimized website is still an important part of your overall mobile mix. Not everyone has a smartphone and not every smartphone user will download your app.
And some observers believe that the mobile Web, enhanced with HTML 5 and whatever comes next, will eventually run all the apps out of business. With 300,000 apps for the iPhone already created, I think that’s unlikely, but possible.
But whatever the future holds, today you need a good mobile-optimized website. And Wells Fargo, for one, hasn’t forgotten about it. Today they sent an email to customers announcing a remodeled mobile site at WF.com, its mobile URL (see screenshot below).
After logging in at the WF.com site, users are greeted with a menu button that opens up a new window of choices (note arrow in screenshot). It’s a nice way to navigate and makes the mobile website feel more like an app. The email also says there is more info on the page to minimize clicking, an important change. I still prefer the native app (note 1), but this is a nice improvement.
Wells Fargo email to customers announcing its redesigned mobile banking site, WF.com (5 Jan. 2011; landing page)
Note: The “Menu” button, when pressed, opens or closes the navigation choices (shown in open mode below)
————–
Note:
1. Ironically, the native app doesn’t seem to be working on my iPhone 4 at the moment (update 6 Jan., it’s working now). Another reason you want to have a good mobile website alternative.