- The deal is expected to be complete by September 2011.
- The all-cash $465 million purchase price is more than six times CashEdge’s projected 2011 revenues of $75 million.
- Fiserv’s last large acquisition was CheckFree for $4.4 billion in 2007, which was 4.5 times its expected revenue. In comparison, Jack Henry & Associates’ $300 million purchase of iPay Technologies last year was 5.5 times iPay’s revenue.
- The expected consolidation of CashEdge’s Popmoney P2P transfer service (200 signed clients) and Fiserv’s ZashPay (700 signed clients) will create a stronger competitor to bank-owned clearXchange.
MoveNbank: Can it Out-simplify BankSimple?
I’ve been accused of falling for the Bank Simple hype. Just to prove that I don’t discriminate, I bring you MoveNBank, a mobile-optimized banking startup founded by Bank 2.0 author and consultant Brett King.
From what little is disclosed on its Facebook page, Twitter feed and Startuply profile I’ve assembled the following facts:
Timeline:
- Founded July 2010
- Private beta to begin soon (per 1 July 2011 Tweet)
- Soft launch scheduled for July 2012
Company:
- Global startup with HQ in NYC (Madison Square Park, 25 W. 31st)
- Founder and Chairman is Brett King
- 8 employees
Product description:
- Mobile only, with no paper or plastic
- NFC-enabled app
- Incorporates “gamification” in UX
- According to Startuply, “reinventing credit scores and more with an open, social transparent, and viral model” (sounds P2P lending-esque)
Bottom line: MoveNbank is looking to leapfrog the competition by removing all vestiges of old-school banking. No branches (of course). No paper (no surprise). And no plastic (what?).
That’s how ING Direct got its start (they did have paper statements), so it’s not unprecedented. But if MoveNbank plans on offering payments, it will be harder to pull off. But with a soft-launch still a year away, it should be able to ride the NFC wave expected to roll across the globe in the next five years.
Are there any other remote banking startups I’m missing? Drop me an email (jim@netbanker.com).
————————————–
MoveNbank placeholder page (11 July 2011)
Alumni News — Week of July 4, 2011
PayPal and Cortera Take Charge in May’s Web Traffic
Each month we survey the Web-traffic performance of our alums, using data from Web-analytics company Compete to review the sites they operate.
Out of 255 alumni, 62 (24%) had more than 10,000 unique U.S. visitors in May 2011 (see tables below). Of the 62 reviewed, 25 (40%) had fewer visitors than in the previous month and 28 (45%) saw a decline year-over-year.
Private Companies
The 44 private companies are as follows:
Notable successes:
- Cortera saw the highest number of unique U.S. visitors in May, with almost 2 million hits.
- HelloWallet experienced the greatest month-over-month growth, with more than four times as many visitors.
- Betterment saw its traffic increase an impressive 38 times from May of last year.
Private Finovate Alumni With More Than 10,000 Unique Visitors in May 2011
Source: Compete.com retrieved June 29, 2011
Public Companies
The 18 public companies are as follows:
Notable successes:
- PayPal experienced the highest number of U.S. visitors in May, with over 32 million visitors.
- TransUnion Interactive saw the highest month-over-month growth with more than two times the number of visitors in May than in April.
- Sybase 365 experienced the highest year-over-year growth, with its traffic up almost 80% from last year.
Public Finovate Alumni With More Than 10,000 Unique Visitors in May 2011
Source: Compete.com retrieved June 29, 2011
_____________________________________________________________________________
Notes:
1. We reviewed 255 unique sites. Data was unavailable or irrelevant for 201 sites because:
- They had been acquired.
- They were no longer available online.
- They were not covered by Compete for various reasons (including some that were not U.S. domestic companies).
- The number of unique visits was too small to be considered accurate.
- They were subdomains of larger websites.
2. Numbers have been rounded to three significant digits.
3. The charts include companies that did not have measurable traffic in May 2011, indicated by “N/A.”
4. Compete draws its information from the online activity of a panel of more than 2 million U.S. Internet users. It is only an estimate of traffic, and may undercount at-work usage.
PSECU’s Remote Deposit Honor System Has Processed $1.4 Billion with Only $74,000 in Losses
Sometimes the best ideas are the simplest ones. Ten years ago PSECU launched the Upost@home deposit service. It allows members to manually enter their deposits in the CU’s online banking system for immediate credit, then mail them to the CU in a postage-paid envelope.
The service, launched in late 2001, was little publicized outside of PSECU’s member base during the first two years. We first heard about it in late 2003 when a second credit union licensed the service. We gave it our highest honor, an OBR Best of the Web award (note 1), one of only five given during the post-bubble dark days of bank-tech innovation (2001 through 2004).
At the time, it seemed an almost crazy idea. An online/offline honor system for deposits. But the CU knew what it was doing. It limited the amount that could be deposited and which members were allowed to use the service.
Now the results speak for themselves (see annual totals in table below):
4.5 million items deposited worth $1.4 billion (avg. of $310 per check)
$74,000 in losses
= 0.0053% loss rate (0.5 basis points)
or 1.6 cents per item
Upost has turned into the least loss-prone method of accepting deposit, including the branch!
Another interesting data point: The CU is processing almost 50,000 Upost@home deposit items per month, about one per month per member enrolled in the service, a pace that’s stayed remarkably consistent over time.
Bottom line: We’ve listed PSECU’s Upost@home on our annual list of top online/mobile innovations of all time (it was ranked #24 of those invented in the past 10 years and #42 of all time). But in terms of “bang for your buck,” it’s probably in the top-5.
Source: PSECU, 5 July 2011
———————————–
Notes:
1. The original article published in Online Banking Report (OBR #103) is reprinted in the Netbanker archives here.
2. The list of top innovators was published in OBR #188.
Alumni News — Week of June 27, 2011
- Former Lending Club director Joseph Toms joined Prosper as its Chief Investment Officer. Link
- The San Francisco Times reported on Prosper’s growth. Link
TD Bank Uses Interactive Online Banner Ad to Capture Mobile Numbers
I was reading one of my favorite personal finance blogs today, Lazy Man and Money, and I noticed an intriguing ad from TD Bank. Actually, the blog is covered in TD ads, with the faces of spokescouple Regis & Kelly peering out from every corner.
But originally I noticed only the ad in the upper-right corner (see first screenshot below). The mobile interactivity, along with the 10 spaces asking for my number, grabbed my attention.
The text-message campaign is powered by Cielo Mobile, whose URL was displayed in the browser status bar after I clicked the banner.
________________________________________________________
How it works
________________________________________________________
1a. Users type their mobile number into the interactive banner ad (upper-right).
1b. The banner returns this thank-you message:
2. The link in the text message (left) opens the mobile webpage (right).
3. The app is downloaded from the iTunes App Store and this is the first screen at launch:
_________________________________________________________
Analysis
_________________________________________________________
Apparently, I’m not the target audience for this banner ad since I don’t have an account at TD Bank. But if inclined to change that, I’d like a little more help opening an account. The bank does better than most by including links to its call center and webpage on the first screen of its native iPhone app (see #3 above), but there should be a direct call to action, or even a different app, for non-customers.
Why I Got My Car Loan Through the Dealer Instead of My Online Bank
(Rant alert: If you are tired of analyst/blogger whining over perceived personal service affronts, it would be best to hit delete now.)
I don’t think there is an actual name for this, but I am car-dealer phobic. Seriously. On more than one occasion, I’ve driven all the way to the dealer. Parked my car. And then driven away as soon as I saw the sales guy (they have all been guys) ambling over. It’s weird.
But I found eBay Motors about 10 years ago and have been overall very happy with the three vehicles I’ve bought there. So that would be the end of the story, if I wasn’t married.
My otherwise wonderful wife greatly prefers vehicles with that new-car smell, not the ones that arrive needing an $1800 catalytic converter to pass the emissions test (my most recent eBay “deal”). And I can’t really complain, because she’s perfectly willing to drive the thing for a decade or more.
Good online application UX
So she ordered a new car and put me in charge of paying for it (does that sound familiar to anyone?). Being an online-only shopper, I went to my favorite car loan specialist (note 1) and completed their online app. The app itself was flawless and took only a few minutes.
While I was disappointed that I wasn’t approved in real-time, I received an email a few minutes later congratulating me on my loan approval. But there was a catch. In order to “to protect my privacy, (the bank) needed to verify some information.” So would I please call. That was 2 weeks ago.
Terrible income verification UX
So I called the next day. What I found didn’t totally surprise me. Despite being a customer of this financial institution (with an open credit line higher than the price of the car), and the fact that I’ve borrowed and paid back two car loans with them previously, and that I requested a 3-year loan which minimizes their collateral risk, and that I have good credit, the bank wanted to verify my income. And because I’m a business owner (not salaried), they needed 3 months of bank statements.
So I dug out the old statements, scanned them (note 2), and emailed them to the bank. There was no confirmation they were received, nor did the online loan-status indicator change (it simply said “approved”). I did that 12 days ago.
Then I waited for a week and heard nothing. So I called back and was told they hadn’t looked at the docs yet, but that they would expedite them. That was six days ago.
The next day, I received an email from the bank asking me to call again. You know that’s not good news. Here’s how that call went:
- Bank: We cannot verify your income because it shows as “Internet transfers” on your bank statement.
Me: But my business banking account is at the same bank as my personal one, so when I get paid, it’s called a “transfer” because it is one.
Bank: Sorry, we only consider it income if the bank statement says “deposit.” - Me: OK, I can understand that, how about I send you my 2010 tax return?
Bank: Sorry, we don’t accept tax returns for income verification. - Me: OK, how about if I send you the last 3 months of my business bank statements, then you can see the transfers leaving that account and landing in my personal account.
Bank: Sorry, we can’t accept biz-bank statements because we don’t make commercial loans. - Me: Can we move this application to an exception processing area for manager review?
Bank: Sorry, we don’t do that. - Me: Is there any way you can think of that I could verify my income?
Bank: Do you have a spouse with W-2 income?
Me: No
Bank: Then unfortunately, I don’t see any way that we can verify your income. Sorry. - Me: Then what I hear you saying is that there is no way for me to get the loan you approved me for?
Bank: Sorry, but that’s the case.
With that we ended the conversation. Rather abruptly if I recall. (I will say, she was actually very nice throughout the whole call, so partial credit for that.)
After I’d cooled down a bit, I decided to call back and try my luck with another rep. Sure enough, after I explained the situation and offered to send the corresponding biz-bank statements to verify the transfers, he said, “That makes sense, let me check with my manager.” Within a minute or two he came back on and said that my solution should work and to please send the business banking statements. Which I did, right away. And again no confirmation that they were received. That was 4 days ago.
After hearing nothing for two more days (this is supposedly being “expedited”), I called back and was told it was under review and there was nothing they could do to speed it up. That was 2 days ago. I haven’t heard anything since.
The car dealer to the rescue
Because I had to pay for the car in full this week or forfeit the deposit, I gave up on my online bank and called the dealer. At their instruction, I completed their short online form, was approved by their indirect lender (thank you U.S. Bank!), and went in and signed the papers. Start-to-finish in just a few hours. There was no income verification. And I even got a better rate.
Lessons for Netbankers: Experiences like this is what gives online lending a bad name. This is the third time in a row I’ve had a really poor experience with an online loan app. I understand that my self-employment, even after 16 years, makes underwriting more difficult in these cautious times. But you need to have a process in place where denied applicants can request a quick review of their application, detailing the mitigating factors.
Simply leaving prospective customers hanging is not good business.
—————————————-
Notes:
1. My policy is to not to disclose the name of the financial institution if it’s about an issue or problem with my personal situation. But I will email you the name as long as you identify yourself and agree not to publicly post it (send to jim@netbanker.com).
2. Unfortunately, I couldn’t simply download estatements since my bank does not offer them, unless you give up your paper statement.
3. For more on online account opening, see Online Banking Report: Improving Online Account Opening ROI (published June 2009).
BillMyParents.com Traffic Spikes to 600,000 Unique Visitors
If you want to attract customers between the ages of 12 to 21+, you could not have a better name than BillMyParents. But living up to that promise, not to mention appealing to parents, is a little trickier.
San Diego-based BillMyParents is a public company (OTCBB: BMPI) currently valued at $40 million. When we first looked at the company (March 2009), it was building an alternative payment mark similar to PayPal or BillMeLater. But the company appears to have pivoted into a more achievable prepaid card product.
Today, its core offering is a $3.95/mo prepaid MasterCard debit card (see full fee schedule below) that offers mobile alerts and basic parental controls (lock, unlock, reload).
Fresh off a $7 million infusion of new funding (Nov. 2010, note 1), the company has ramped up its advertising with its first national TV commercial (on ESPN; link) and a mention in MTV’s Rob Dyrdek’s Fantasy Factory (which apparently has something to do with skateboarding). It is also working with Street League Skateboarding.
Evidently, those efforts are bearing fruit as website traffic is up 20-fold since December, to 600,000 unique visitors in May according to Compete estimates (see below). More importantly, traffic to the secure site (e.g., account holders) is up to 17,000 visitors in May compared to 7,000 in December (note 2).
Relevance for Netbankers: Teens want to spend. Parents want transparency and control. And banks want to attract teens and tweens that could be customers for the next 80 years. And if that’s not enough, in the United States, prepaid looks to be favored in the post-Durbin world (previous post).
So expect prepaid cards to be a hotbed of activity from both banks and non-banks (note 3).
—————————————
BillMyParents.com unique monthly visitors
Source: Compete, 28 June 2011
Parent section of BillMyParent’s website (28 June 2011)
Fee schedule
——–
Notes:
1. Source:http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/socialwise-changes-corporate-name-to-billmyparents-inc-otcqb-sclw-1525359.htm
2. Source: http://siteanalytics.compete.com/account.billmyparents.com/
3. For example, BankSimple http://www.netbanker.com/bank_simple/
More Than Just a Free Credit Score From Credit Karma
Web Traffic:
Alumni News– Week of June 20, 2011
TDECU Posts 50% Growth in Mobile Banking Users in 2 Months
This guest post was written by Daniel Thomas, a 25-year strategy and product development veteran of the financial services industry. He is a principal consultant with Mindful Insights LLC.
Back in April, we showed you the list of the 30 most popular iPad apps from U.S. banks and other financial services companies listed on iTunes. The list featured the usual big names, but one surprise was #14, Texas Dow Employees Credit Union (TDECU), a 132,000 member, 19-branch, $1.6B credit union headquartered in Lake Jackson, TX.
The app, UniFI, available on iPad, iPhone and Android platforms, was developed by startup FI-Mobile. The full-featured offering includes:
- All the banking functions offered in online banking
- Linkage to Facebook and Twitter
- Branch locations
- Rates
- Advertising capabilities
- Analytics
FI Mobile says it can launch the app in three weeks for FIs that already have a mobile banking application, and seven weeks if they have to develop a native app.
_____________________________________________________________
Features
_____________________________________________________________
Clicking on Mobile Banking from the home screen launches the WAP service developed by Q2ebanking (note 1).
Both the Locations screen and the Check Our Rates page fetch real-time content from tables that the bank or credit union maintain in FI Mobile’s advanced-content management system (admin tool).
TDECU has an active social network presence, so Facebook and Twitter integration facilitates more frequent views and comments.
The app also includes contact information, rates, and access to TDECU credit cards through gotomycard.com.
__________________________________________________________
Results
________________________________________________________________________
According to Brad Clutter, Online Banking Product Manager at TDECU, in the first two months after the app’s launch in March, mobile subscribers grew 50% (their target was 10%) and the number of mobile transactions (balance inquiries, transfers, etc.) grew 30% compared to their existing WAP-only, mobile-banking program. He said, “We have been blown away by the results we’ve seen, and they have more than justified the cost.”
Thanks to FI Mobile’s analytics, TDECU can now see that their app is being used by members in all 50 states and in 16 different countries. They know that 84% are returning users and use of Android devices outnumbers Apple iOS nearly 2-to-1.
———————-
Note:
1. UniFI is vendor agnostic and will launch the mobile banking program developed by any vendor. And if you don’t have one, FI Mobile will develop one.