Wipro Inks Agreement to Acquire Viteos Group

Wipro Inks Agreement to Acquire Viteos Group

Wipro_homepage_Dec2015

In a bid to grow its fund accounting and business process services and capabilities, Bangalore-based IT consultancy Wipro has agreed to acquire Viteos Group. The Times of India reports a purchase price of $130 million.

Viteos Group provides a proprietary platform built for cross-border, any asset class, any currency, post-trade operations for the U.S. alternative investment-management industry. The company has offices in New York, New Jersey, London, and the Cayman Islands.

Nagendra Bandaru, SVP and head of business process services for Wipro, says Viteos “brings with it experienced leadership, domain expertise, and unique BPaaS capability.” Speaking for Viteos, company founder and CEO Shankar Iyer referred to the acquisition as the “culmination” of his company’s “search for a global partner.”

Wipro_stage_FEU2015

From left: Wipro General Manager Mukund Kalmanker, Wipro general manager, and Sudhakar Babu Tamminedi, Wipro practice head, demonstrated ngGenie myAdvisor at FinovateEurope 2015 in London.

Terms of the acquisition were not immediately available, and the deal is still subject to regulatory review. The acquisition is scheduled to be complete by the end of March 2016.

The deal combines Viteos Group’s buy-side expertise with Wipro’s sell-side credentials in areas such as reconciliation, settlements, and KYC, among others. President of Wipro, CEO Shaji Farooq explained that the trend of IT services moving toward the “as-a-service” model made a deal like this one with Viteos a priority. “Our strategy is to invest in industry vertical platforms which will provide platform-based services to our clients in a transaction/outcome-based pricing model,” Farooq explained. “Viteos will further our strategy in the capital markets domain.”

Viteos Group is Wipro’s second acquisition of the month. The company announced plans to acquire IT consultancy Cellent AG for €73.5 million early in December and, in June, Wipro launched its e-KYC solution which leverages its AI platform, Wipro HOLMES. The company began the year with a major, multiyear, IT outsourcing contract with Allied Irish Banks (AIB).

Founded in 1945 as Western India Palm Refined Oils Limited, Wipro is headquartered in Bangalore, India. A multinational IT consulting and systems-integration firm, Wipro demonstrated its Wipro ngGenie myAdvisor technology at FinovateEurope 2015.

2015: A Year in Finovate Alumni Mergers and Acquisitions

2015: A Year in Finovate Alumni Mergers and Acquisitions

Handshake_graphic

2015 was another big year for mergers and acquisitions in the fintech industry. And whether they were the acquirer or the acquired, Finovate alums were very much a part of the M&A action.

Because terms of many deals were undisclosed, it is difficult to get a precise number on how much money was spent acquiring some of fintech’s most promising startups this year. But looking just at those acquisitions for which figures were available, we can see that 2015 was a banner year in M&A (more than $7 billion) — and that’s just counting alums.

So from the $5 billion deal between FIS and Sungard to the “alum-acquires-alum” mergers of September 2015, let’s take a closer look at some of the major unions of the year that featured Finovate alums.


December


October


September


August


July


May


April


March


February


January


If you’re a Finovate alum whose merger we’ve missed or acquisition we’ve overlooked, let us know. Send us an email at research@finovate.com.

Finicity Acquires Aurora Financial Systems

Finicity Acquires Aurora Financial Systems

Aurora_Note_logo_Sep2015As we were about to publish the Finovate debut feature for Aurora Financial Systems, we were asked to hold off by Chris Melendez, vice president for corporate partnerships. “There may be some big news coming,” he said.

Finicity_logo_FinDEVr2015This week, the big news arrived: Aurora Financial Systems has agreed to be acquired by fellow Finovate alum, Finicity.

In a statement released earlier this week, Finicity announced it had acquired “substantially all the assets” of Aurora Financial Systems. Aurora will become part of Finicity’s Data Services Division and will be led by Melendez and Aurora co-founder Michael Ciberey. The terms of the acquisition were not disclosed.

A division of Finicity Corporation, Finicity Data Services provides API services for fintech developers building account aggregation, cash-flow verification, and account-ownership-verification solutions. With the acquisition of Aurora Financial Systems, Finicity will add transaction processing and card program management to its developer stack.

With the acquisition, Finicity is intensifying its promotion of its TxPUSH real-time financial data delivery. Finicity co-founder Nick Thomas highlighted Aurora’s TxPUSH Event Management API and Event PUSH Delivery engine as “standards-based solutions” for delivering card transaction data “immediately, not three days from now.”

“Real-time transaction data opens many new doors for fintech innovators,” Thomas said.

FinDEVr2015LogoV2DateFounded in 1999 and headquartered in Salt Lake City, Utah, Finicity’s Data Services division launched its TxPUSH API for fintech apps at FinovateSpring 2015. The company will make its FinDEVr debut next month at FinDEVr 2015 San Francisco (early bird ticket sales end this Friday) where it will demonstrate real-time data delivery via its TxPUSH API.

Aurora Financial Systems made its Finovate debut at FinovateSpring 2015 in San Jose, Calif., with the debut of Note, a vertically integrated budgeting solution for FIs. But the Purchase, New York-based company’s pedigree is as a debit processor and program manager specializing in incentive, payroll, and reloadable, prepaid solutions. Aurora has processed millions of dollars of transactions within these categories since its founding in 2009.

Early Warning Acquires Authentify

Early Warning Acquires Authentify

EWSAuthentifyAcquisition

Authentify, a company that offers phone-based, multifactor authentication to more than 1,200 financial institutions and e-commerce companies, today announced it will soon be acquired.

The acquirer is Chicago-based Early Warning, a company owned and governed by the largest banks in the U.S. and which provides risk-management solutions to 1,100 banks, government entities, and companies. Once the Authentify acquisition is under its belt, Early Warning will bolster its current offering with a multifactor authentication solution that integrates multiple channels and authentication methods.

The terms of the acquisition were not disclosed.

AuthentifyHomepage

This is not Early Warning’s first move to broaden its offerings. In 2013, the Arizona-based company partnered with Payfone to combine device and customer-identity authentication with transaction data to ensure security. Early Warning has an equity stake in Payfone.

Authentify was founded in 1999 and Peter Tapling is CEO. The company demonstrated 2CHK at FinovateFall 2011.

Printer Giant Lexmark to Acquire Kofax for $1 Billion

Printer Giant Lexmark to Acquire Kofax for $1 Billion

KofaxHomepage

Kofax creates mobile and web solutions made to simplify customer interactions. The California-based company announced today it has been acquired by Kentucky-based Lexmark International, a global corporation with approximately $3.8 billion in revenue.

Kofax’s Board of Directors, which accounts for 25% of the company’s shareholders, unanimously voted in favor of the merger. Lexmark will pay $11 per share in cash for all outstanding shares of Kofax, for a total value of $1 billion (net of cash acquired).

Lexmark is well-known for its hardware, such as printers, copiers, and fax machines. The company also distributes document imaging and electronic form software, under the brand Perceptive Software, that competes with Kofax’s offerings. Scott Coons, Perceptive Software president and CEO and Lexmark VP states:

“The combination of Perceptive Software and Kofax solutions strengthens the breadth and depth of our offering, giving us an… ability to help customers… connect unstructured information to their systems of record.”

Additionally, Lexmark anticipates the acquisition will expand its reach to mid-market business customers. Kofax has 20,000 customers and 850 channel partners across the globe.

LexmarkHomepage

When the acquisition closes in Q2 of 2015, Lexmark will double the size of the software branch of its business.

Kofax was founded in 1985. Reynolds Bish is CEO. The company last demoed at FinovateSpring 2014 where it debuted its Mobile Capture Platform. Kofax won Best of Show at FinovateAsia 2013 in Singapore.

Fintech Unicorns

Gilt statue of a unicorn on the Council House,...

Gilt statue of a unicorn on the Council House, Bristol (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

In January, we identified the billion-dollar fintech unicorns (post), but William Mougayar went deeper looking at the tech companies founded since 2000 valued at $250 million or more. He compiled a list of 235 companies around the globe. Seventeen of those (7%) we consider fintech (15 if you don’t count real estate specialists Zillow and Trulia). The list is not yet complete (more companies are being added by readers), but it’s an interesting data point.

Highlights:

  • Square has been the alpha unicorn (oxymoron?) since it burst on the scene five years ago. But it looks like Lending Club is closing the gap, valued at, $3.8 billion, just (!) $1.2 billion less. However, the peer lender seems to be on the rise and headed to an IPO, while media reports indicate Square may be struggling a bit to maintain its valuation and has scuttled its own IPO plans for this year.  
  • This is the first time we’ve seen Paydiant mentioned in the billion-dollar club, but we are not surprised.
  • Of the still-private companies listed here, all but two are Finovate alums (note 1). 

Table: Fintech companies valued at $250 mil or more (founded 2000 or later)

Company Finovate Alum? Founded Valuation
Square No 2009 $5.0 bil
Lending Club Yes 2006 $3.8 bil
Zillow No 2005 $3.8 bil (public)
Xero Yes 2006 $3.5 bil (public)
Klarna Yes 2005 $2.5 bil
Wonga Yes 2007 $2.0 bil
Stripe No 2011 $1.8 bil
LifeLock No 2005 $1.5 bil (public)
Trulia No 2004 $1.2 bil (public)
Paydiant Yes 2010 $1.0 bil
Climate Corp No 2006 $930 mil (acquired)
Braintree (Paypal) Yes 2007 $800 mil (acquired)
BazaarVoice Yes 2005 $540 mil
Cardlytics Yes 2008 $500 mil
Payfone Yes 2008 $500 mil
Prosper Yes 2006 $500 mil
Vitrue No 2006 $300 mil (acquired)

Source: StartupManagement.org (link), 20 April 2014

—————————————-

Note:
1. Come see the latest unicorn candidates at FinovateSpring next week (29 & 30 April 2014) in Silicon Valley.

Fintech Four: Banno, Borro, Personetics & Auction.com are on a Roll

It’s been a crazy week in fintech, and it’s only Wednesday morning. Because my brain can hold no more than four stories at a time (and that’s a stretch), it’s time to publish a “fintech four” mid-week. I don’t know which of these is more dramatic, so I’ll go in alphabetic order: 

1. Auction.com joins the billion-dollar fintech club

Thumbnail image for auction.jpgI’m not sure everyone considers Auction.com a fintech play, but as an online asset sales platform (which moved $7 billion last year), it’s close enough for me. It just raised a fresh $50 million from Google Ventures at a valuation of $1.2 billion. So I’ll be adding Auction.com to our “Fintech billion-dollar club.” 

>>> Metrics and more from Bloomberg here.

2. Banno acquired by Jack Henry

banno.jpgWhile we don’t know the $$ number, given the traction Finovate alum Banno had in the market (375 bank clients), and the relatively high valuations in the fintech space these days ($1.75 billion for Stripe), this must have been a pretty nice payday for the owners and investors in Iowa-based Banno (formerly T8 Webware). Founder Wade Arnold is staying on at Jack Henry and is super excited about his future with the Kansas City-based technology vendor. 
English: Wordmark of Borro, the characters &qu...

3. Borro borrows $112 million

In one of the biggest fundraising rounds in fintech history, U.K.-based Borro landed $112 million to further its high-end online pawn brokerage business. I met founder Paul Aitken last fall and was impressed with the product, which allows consumers to borrow against non-liquid assets, say, a Jacob Lawrence in the hall, at pretty high rates (3% to 4% per month). Until then, I had no idea there was a large, underserved (near prime?) market holding high-end assets (outside Downton Abbey anyway). Even so, I was shocked to see a $112 million round. While terms of the deal weren’t disclosed, I have to believe all or part of the money is debt, not equity. So I’m not going to add Borro to the billion-dollar club, yet. Apparently online lending is back! 

>>> Average loan amount = $12k (against a $20k value)… see Press release
>>> TechCrunch breaks down the Borro loan process and metrics here

4. Personetics is on a roll

pesonetics.jpgAt this week’s great Bank Innovation event in Seattle, I finally had a chance to meet face-to-face with Personetics, the Sequoia-backed “predictive financial services engine.” I’ve been impressed with what I’ve read about the company, and loved the Fiserv demo at FinovateEurope last month (demo here) featuring a forward-looking PFM piece powered by Personetics. But I had no idea how much traction the company was gaining in less than three years since its A-round. While I can’t name names, if even one of these deals moves into production, it has the potential to change the face of online banking. 
>>> Fiserv demo at FinovateEurope featuring insights powered by Personetics here (12 Feb 2014)

Why the BBVA Simple Bank Deal is Extraordinary

the-next-chapter925293204.jpg

I was on vacation when the Simple deal went down last week. So, today I read the 25 or so unique articles published Thursday and Friday on BBVA’s $117 million acquisition of Simple. Of the bunch, only Ron Shevlin dove under the covers as to why a global financial powerhouse plunked down nine figures for a relatively small prepaid debit card portfolio. His take: the brand.

I’ve been a huge Simple junkie, publishing 22 posts on the startup in the past four years. And I was delighted it chose to make its first industry appearance at Finovate in Fall 2011 (video here). But I’m even more excited about this deal, which was remarkable for several reasons:
  • Other than ING’s regulator-mandated divestiture of its U.S. unit to Capital One, this is the first major retail digital bank acquisition in the United States EVER. Yes, EVER.  Since the dawn of what we called “Internet-only” banks in Oct 1995 (note 1), not a single one has been acquired at other than a fire sale (e.g., ING Direct purchase of Netbank after it was closed by the FDIC), (see note 2). 
  • The revenue multiple was off the charts. Simple says it processed $1.7 billion last year. Assuming this was all debit card volume and they split the revenues relatively equally with their processor, The Bancorp Bank (which is Durbin-exempt, note 3), the startup generated somewhat less than $10 million in revenues last year. That’s not at all bad for a bank in its first full year of business. Founder Josh Reich says they were on a path to profitability, not a small feat for a tech company with nearly 100 employees.
  • Banks are usually acquired for some premium of their assets and deposits. Simple had zero financial assets since it only collected deposits. We don’t know their deposit totals, but with an average of 65,000 customers (note 4) making $1.7 billion in purchases, that means each spent about $2,000 per month. Let’s say that each of its 100,000 accounts held double that on average ($4,000), the bank had around $400 mil in deposits at year-end 2013. I’m not sure what banks are paying for demand deposits these days, but it’s not 25%.
  • Simple raised $18 mil since inception, but we don’t know at what valuation. But with the $117 million cash deal, it appears that investors were rewarded adequately. It was no 10x exit, but it could have been 2x to 3x, or more.
  • BBVA paid almost $1,200 per customer. Given that Simple’s entire funding amount of $18 mil had already generated 100,000 customers ($180 per customer), clearly acquiring this customer base was not the main driver of the valuation.
_________________________________________________
What it means:
  • Moven, Holvi, Tink, Numbrs, and other digital-only banks will see a bump in their valuations. 
  • Y-Combinator and other accelerators will see a surge in retail banking startups (which leads to more great Finovate presenters)
  • Simple under BBVA will be a fantastic case study with plenty of material for fintech bloggers and analysts (and especially blogging analysts)
  • There will be more legacy financial institutions following this strategy (clearly, there were other bidders to push the valuation above $100 million); however, don’t expect a stampede. Two or three acquisitions in 18 years is hardly a trend.
  • BBVA could very well make Simple its ING Direct-like brand (“BBVA Simple”?) across multiple new international markets (hat-tip to Venture Beat for being the only tech blog to focus on the international opportunity).
  • At least for a few years, before the founding team scatters to new ventures, it will be useful to have a semi-autonomous unit in Portland building out the services.
Finally, I’ll need a new VC-backed retail banking startup to obsess over. Time to get my Moven card activated.
——————
Notes:
1. The first pure digital bank was Security First Network Bank (SFNB) which was dumped for $13 mil in 1998 after attracting $50 mil in deposits and $14 million in credit card receivables).

2. One could argue that E*Trade’s ill-fated purchase of Telebanc for $1.8 bil in 1998 qualifies, but Telebanc was primarily a direct bank built through the phone channel.
3. Interestingly, as part of BBVA, which is not exempt from Durbin price controls (as far as I can figure), Simple’s interchange rate will likely fall dramatically, making the revenue multiple much higher going forward.

4. The bank started the year with 30,000 accounts and now has 100,000. So, assuming growth was even over the year, the average annual number of accounts = 65,000.
5. For more on pure-play digital banks, see our full Online Banking Report here (published in late 2011, subscription).

Monday Fintech Four

image Editor’s note: This was supposed to be the Friday Fintech Four, which is much better alliteration. But alas, it didn’t get published, so here’s the belated Monday version.

<drum roll> Here are the four most surprising fintech developments of the past week (in no particular order):

____________________________________________

One: Stealthy mobile payment startup Clinkle hires long-time CFO of Netflix, Barry McCarthy, as its COO
____________________________________________

image McCarthy was CFO from 1999 to 2010, taking Netflix public in 2003, then overseeing its finances as a public company for seven years. It’s pretty unusual for a big-name public company exec to take on an exec role at a startup, especially one in mobile payments. And one that hasn’t even officially launched yet to boot. McCarthy is on the board of three startups: Chegg, Eventbrite and Wealthfront, a startup in the investment space.
    >> LinkedIn profile of McCarthy
    >> A nice overview of the news at TechCrunch 
    >> An interview with McCarthy at AllThings D

_____________________________________________

Two: New mobile PFM, Level Money, beats Square Cash to #1 in iOS app store (finance)
_____________________________________________

image As soon as Square launched its P2P payments app, Square Cash, it quickly rocketed to number two in the Finance section of the iPhone app store (see Chart 1 below) and number 55 across all free apps in all categories. But it never got higher, and a week later it’s hanging in at number 11.

The reason it missed the top slot? Another newcomer, Level Money, a great-looking new PFM, was being featured by Apple in the App Store and maintained the top ranking during that period (see Chart 2). During its time as a promoted app, Level Money maintained a top-20 ranking among all 500,000+ free apps (see Chart 3).

    >> Netbanker post on Square Cash
    >> Distimo app rankings for Square Cash (see following chart)

———

Chart 1: Square Cash app ranking in Free Finance in Apple App Store

image

Chart 2: Level Money app ranking in Free Finance in Apple App Store

image

Chart 3: Level Money ranking among all free apps in the Apple App Store

image

_________________________________________

Three: Amex customers have put $1 billion into its Bluebird prepaid card
__________________________________________

At this year’s SourceMedia Payments Forum, American Express revealed key metrics about its highly touted Bluebird prepaid program sold in Walmart stores:

  • 1 million new accounts
  • $1 billion in total loads
  • Average load of $1,000 per account
  • 87% of accounts new to Amex
  • 53% over age 35

Thanks to the attendees who tweeted the metrics @leimer (Bradly Leimer) and @JimMarous among others.

image

_____________________________________________________________

Four: Four fintech startups snapped up last week
_____________________________________________________________

Compared to other tech sectors, fintech has experienced less M&A activity in the past few years. Everything moves a little slower in a highly regulated, fraud-magnet segment. Buying fintech is not like bolting on a photosharing app. That said, it was a busy past 10 days on the M&A front:

  • Betterment buys ImpulseSave to boost its auto-savings features (Finovate post)
  • UK’s FundingCircle buys Endurance Lending to enter U.S. market (Techcrunch)
  • Blackhawk acquires Intelispend (Digital Transactions)
  • Wonga buys Germany’s BillPay to expand outside United Kingdom (Techcrunch)

——-
Photo credit: Fab Festival

Op Ed: Banks, Shop So Your Profits Don’t Drop

by Michael Nuciforo

Michael Nuciforo is a Mobile Banking Consultant at Keatan. He previously worked at ANZ on a number of developments, including goMoney, and more recently managed the UK retail portfolio as Head of Mobile Banking at RBS. Follow him @TheBoldWar.

——————————-

image There were 2,277 of them last year totaling $45 billion. And no, that’s not last year’s football salaries. It was the volume and value of tech startup acquisitions. Yet banks barely participated. Could acquisitions be the mechanism for banks to rapidly innovate? Is it time for banks to shop before their profits drop?

Mergers and acquisitions have been part and parcel of the technology sector for over three decades. The industry wouldn’t be what it is today without it. Google Ventures invests over $400 million annually in a wide variety of startups. Facebook has already acquired over 35 businesses, with Instagram being the most notable at nearly $800 million alone. It’s big business indeed.

Why do the biggest, most successful and talented tech businesses, feel the constant need to acquire? It feels counterintuitive, but it makes perfect sense. The industry is so competitive that one day you’re My Space and the next day…well, you’re My Space. If executed correctly, acquisitions have four core benefits:

  • New Capabilities: Acquisitions are the quickest way to shift the dial or plug gaps in your offering
  • New People: It is a great way to bring on fantastic talent
  • More Protection: By buying the competition you can protect the status quo.
  • New Revenues: Acquisitions of cash-flow-positive businesses can immediately improve the bottom line

But where are the banks? Why do they seem to ignore the opportunity to acquire or partner? Of the 2,277 acquisitions in 2012, only three were by banks. We believe banks must start protecting their position by using strategic acquisitions to implement the new products and services.

image For inspiration, banks needn’t look far. Capital One, which has the sixth-largest deposit portfolio in the US, is already taking up the fight. Off the back of Capital Labs, its own start-up investment venture, the bank has established three offices in the United States. Startups can work there, obtain support and use Capital One API programs. Oh, and of those three bank start up purchases last year, Capital One completed two of them.

image In May 2012, Capital One acquired BankOns, a small San Francisco start up that won Best of Show at FinovateSpring 2011 (demo video here). It also purchased Bundle in late December (demo video).

BankOns provides a sophisticated offers and coupons program and Bundle is a data analytics and PFM platform. Besides acquiring the technology and intellectual property, CapitalOne has also had to find room for a new corner office. BankOns founder Joshua Greenough was installed as Director of Innovation immediately after the acquisition. Finally, Capital One has already made at least one acquisition this year, picking up Verifone’s Sail mPOS unit, and renaming It Spark Pay.

image The other big banking acquisition came from Chase which spent $40 million late last year on Bloomspot, an offers and coupons platform. Bloomspot comes with a 100-strong team instantly boosting the Chase Offers service. Chase had plans to hire substantially over 2013, and through the Bloomspot acquisition, they filled that gap instantly.

While these deals represent some progress by banks, it will be interesting to see if they pay off. There are numerous risks and considerations for banks looking to play in the tech M&A game:

  • Talent retention: Banks may have challenges integrating and retaining new talent. Entrepreneurs and startup talent may not find hierarchical banks the most exciting long-term place of employment. Banks should therefore place a premium on acquiring smaller start-ups with management teams with previous banking experience. They are more likely to take the step back into the industry and stay.
  • Risk aversion: Banks typically only like to work with recognized quantities, hence the fast follower mentality. Banks may struggle to commit to deals considered high-risk. Therefore, it may be better to invest in a small portfolio of smaller businesses rather than a single large deal.
  • Proving return on investment: It’s not easy to measure the true cost and revenues from a new business endeavour, especially within a large hierarchy of overlapping services. But showing that the deal paid off is the first step towards doing a sequel.

Ultimately, it is important to ensure that the vision and aspirations of both businesses are aligned. While fintech startups may not initially aspire to be acquired by a bank, money and scale talks loudest. Many of the giant payment companies such as American Express, Visa, and MasterCard have made numerous acquisitions.

With FinovateFall just three months away (Sep. 10-11), there is still time for banks to think strategically. Don’t go to just look around and swap a few cards. Don’t just think,”Can we replicate that?” Instead, go with a different point of view and figure out what businesses you could acquire or exclusively partner with. Decide whether you are looking for a particular capability, skillset, or to simply protect your turf. Look out for your own BankOns, Bundle or Bloomspot. In the banking industry, sometimes all you need is one other bank to do it and everyone follows. Oh, that’s already happened…

Infographic: Internet Banking Vendor Timeline, 1997 to 2012

Here is a monster infographic from our friends at Mindful Insights LLC, a boutique consulting firm in the digital finance space (previous post). You can click on the image for a larger version, or better yet, grab the PDF version here. We appreciate the opportunity to publish it.

image

Intuit’s New Quicken Site Sprouts Some Mint

image If anyone still wondered how serious Intuit is about incorporating the Mint brand into its portfolio after its $170 million acquisition, take a look at the latest version of the Quicken sales site. Mint is prominently featured (see first screenshot below), especially if you scroll one “ad spot” over (second screenshot).

I also found Mint mentioned at PayTrust, Intuit’s bill management site (third screenshot). There’s even a small plug on the Quicken Online login page (fourth screenshot).

However, on Mint’s site the co-branding is not reciprocated. Quicken is not mentioned at all and Intuit is relegated to 8-point type at the bottom of the page (fourth screenshot).

The latest traffic figures from Compete support the theory that Intuit is de-emphasizing Quicken Online in favor of Mint. Traffic to <quicken.intuit.com> fell 50% in November to about 400,000, while Mint held steady at about 3x that, 1.2 million unique visitors.

image
Source: Compete, 10 Dec 2009 (link)

Quicken homepage on default choice, Quicken 2010 (link; 9 Dec. 2009, 11 PM)

image

Quicken homepage with Mint.com selected from scrolling choices
Note: Yellow highlight is mine

image

Intuit PayTrust homepage (link)

image

Quicken Online login page (link)

image

Mint homepage
Intuit mentioned twice at bottom of page (yellow highlight is mine). 

image 

Note: For more information on the PFM space, see our Online Banking Report on Personal Finance Features.