Summer Banking Sweepstakes

There's nothing like a good old sweepstakes to add a little life to your summertime marketing efforts.

We especially like the idea of contests tied to online usage, especially bill payment. Resource Bank is the latest we've spotted with a bill-pay sweeps. This homepage announcement sums it up:

Pay 3 bills online during the month of June and you will be automatically entered in the "Let Us Pay Your Bills" Sweepstakes. The winner will be reimbursed for all online payments made during the month, up to $300.

This three-month contest (June, July, August) is ultra low-budget — a total prize pool that maxes out at $900 ($300 times 3 months) — but it's still effective.

It would be even better if the bank spent a couple hundred bucks on professional graphics and boosted the monthly maximum payout to $1000 or more. If you are lucky, you won't have to pay out more than a few hundred dollars anyway, so why not make it sound better?

Pnc_scratch_game2On the other hand, we're not so sure about PNC Bank's latest, an online "scratch" card you take into the branch to check for a match. Matches are rewarded with the prize shown (iPod Shuffle, portable DVD, or digital cam).

We live outside the PNC footprint, so we can't check it out firsthand, but I'm guessing the branch is supposed to cross-sell like crazy when you show up to get the official "match card" to see if you are a winner. But more than likely the branch sales staff will be otherwise occupied during the lunchtime rush when most online users stop by, so sales impact will be low.

Also, it's too easy to win. With 5000 total prizes across 700,000 maximum entries, the overall odds are 1:141, pretty sweet for prizes worth $100 to $200 each. With such a rich prize pool, and relatively low hurdles to entry, the bank risks being overrun with repeat entrants. Granted, you can only enter once per day, but it would be hard to stop users from going to multiple branches. Even if everyone abides by the rules, the bank may see the same faces day after day, reducing sales opportunities and clogging the branch at busy times.

Doing the math: If the average number of entries is 10 per person, PNC will interact with just 70,000 unique customers. Assuming a 2% conversion rate, that's 1400 new product sales. Just considering the $700,000 prize pool alone, that's an acquisition cost of $500. That does not include other sweepstakes and marketing costs.

In comparison, it makes Resource Bank's $300 sweepstakes look pretty cost effective. Probably better would be something in-between, not so rich that you attract too many people out to game the system, but not so stingy that your customers wonder why you are even bothering. 

If you'd like access to more financial interactive marketing ideas, check out the Interactive Financial Marketing Database from our sister publication, the Online Banking Report.

Keeping Tabs on the Financial Blogosphere

Blogpulse_logo_1 Writing in The Wall Street Journal’s MarketPlace section, William Bulkeley discusses a new technique for tracking consumer opinions of products, companies, and other topics. The article, Marketers Scan Blogs for Insights, explains how marketers, PR departments, and brand consultants are using free and not-so-free tools to scan the so-called "blogosphere."

We tested Intelliseek’s BlogPulse on some security topics we’ve been researching and found it to be an effective tool. There were more blog citations than we found in a Google search, and they were better organized. Also, BlogPulse provides a trending tool to gauge the relative strength of a search term over the past 6 months.

Blog_plus_trendingHere we compared "phishing" to "online banking" and found similar activity levels for both terms (click on the inset for a better look).

While this tool won’t replace traditional market research, it may be worth checking out from time to time.

JB

American Express Spruces Up its Email Confirmations

American Express, long one of the savviest financial marketers, recently updated the look of its routine "payment received" email confirmation.

Amex_payment_confirmation_1It’s a nice change from the typical text-only message. Key features include:
– last 5 digits of card number for verification
– account login
– balance transfer offer
– Blue Cash offer

But the "Dear Cardmember" salutation is a mistake.

With all the hysteria about phishing and email fraud, the opening should be personalized, both to differentiate itself from SPAM and to insulate cardmembers (and itself) from phishing attacks. This is especially important in a communication which includes a built-in login button, an inviting target for phishers.

American Express does provide several unique identifiers: the last 5 digits of the card number, the payment date, and payment amount. But those aren’t instantly recognizable to all cardmembers. The combination of account name and the last few digits is much more effective (see Citibank article).

Grades
A  for look & feel
A- for cross sales (two offers might be a bit much)
A for self-service with five links to popular online card management functions
B- for security (last 5 digits included, but no cardholder name, no mention of how to verify the authenticity)
————————–
A- overall

JB

If you’d like to learn more about the bank and financial services email trends, check out Email Marketing in Financial Services: Leveraging the Inbox from our sister publication, the Online Banking Report.

Financial Institutions with the Longest Online Archives

In the most recent issue of Online Banking Report, we outlined an important competitive feature going forward: online archives.

We sampled 50 financial institution websites and found the longest archives as follows:

Statements – 24 months at The Whitney Bank
Transactions – 58 months at ING Direct (since inception of the bank)
Images – 84 months at E*Trade Bank

Frost_logoWe’ve just been alerted that Frost Bank has real-time statement archives dating back to 1997, a full 100 months and counting. That’s nearly 5 times the length of our previous front-runner, The Whitney. And effective July 17, Frost will also have 18 month image and transaction archives, double the average length of our sample banks.

Finally, if you sum the archive length across all 3 types, Frost’s 136 (11 + 18 + 18) is the clear winner. Runner-up is E*Trade at 126. No one else is higher than 70.

Keep those cards and letters coming. Email me if you know of anyone who has longer archives than those listed above.

P.S. Another one we got partially wrong: HSBC provides 24 months of archives for deposit products and 12 months for credit cards. We reported 12 months for all.

JB

Chase Ends Last Major Experiment with Scan-and-Pay Bill Management

PaytrustEffective Monday, Chase Bank will end its four-year experiment with so-called scan-and-pay bill payment (download the email announcement below). Popularized in 1999-2000 by Cyberbills, PayMyBills.com, and PayTrust, the service allowed users to have their mailed bills redirected to the service provider where they were scanned and posted to a website. Users were alerted to the new bills and could pay them through a variety of methods.

Download final email announcing the termination of Chase Bank's "Premium Plan" total bill management service

As demand failed to materialize, the three service providers all ended up under Metavante ownership. Last year, Metavante sold the remaining PayTrust business to Intuit. Chase was the only major bank to offer the service, using it as the premium option in a three-level product line (see OBR 82, p. 8).

Analysis
This is a service that sounds great on paper, but is too complicated for the benefits provided. Winning electronic bill payment services need to provide quick payback with a minimal learning curve. That's what so nice about CheckFree's new system that allows users to add a new biller by simply entering the biller's phone number.

While the few users who took the trouble to redirect their bills and set-up automated payments were quite satisfied, it was just too much trouble for all but a fringe group of highly-organized computer-savvy types, the kind of person who is a long-term user of Quicken. So it makes a lot of sense that the sole remaining provider of the service is Intuit.

JB

 

Low-Cost Bank Logos

Vista_by_logoworks This isn’t the kind of thing you usually find in The Wall Street Journal, but today they ran an article in their Small Business column about low-cost graphic design services from LogoWorks.com. Their financial clients include Peach State Bank and Vista Federal Credit Union.

For $385, three different designers will each provide 2 or 3 logos based on your written input. The flat-rate price also includes unlimited revisions to the designs and turnaround time is 72 hours. For those on a really tight budget, a $265 option puts just two designers on your account and limits revisions to two rounds.

Analysis
Distinctive logos are a great way to improve the professionalism of your website and LogoWorks makes it extremely simple and cost effective to get just what you need in a timely fashion.

For more information, read Online Banking Report (100/101), Financial Website Usability: Homepage 

JB

Update: Bank of America’s SiteKey Goes Live in Tennessee

Sitekey_coming_soonBank of America issued a press release saying that it went live today in Tennessee with its OBR Best-of-the-Web-winning multi-factor authentication system. However, a search of the bank's website, using Tennessee as our state, found no mention other than the "coming soon" paragraph that's been posted for the past several weeks (click on inset to read).  

">Read our previous article.

–JB

 

U.S. Bank Splashscreen Announces Bill Pay Improvements

Usbank_splashscreen_1U.S. Bank, with more than 1 million online banking customers, just went live with CheckFree’s latest bill payment system (see OBR 113, p. 11). The improvements were communicated to current customers via a splashscreen the first time they went into the bill payment system (click on the inset above for a close-up).

The changes were also highlighted on a splashscreen after online banking login (see inset below). Customers also received a letter with similar information.

Improvements

  • Much better user interface
  • Integrated checking account balance
  • Faster payments for some merchants, some with same-day delivery
  • More customer-friendly terminology such as "biller" instead of "payee"
  • Slick add-a-biller function keyed off phone number (which really works, I added myself as a biller by typing my phone number, clicking "enter", confirming that it was the right address, and clicking again…took about 10 seconds!)

Analysis
The reason for this article is to highlight the effectiveness of splashscreens for communicating important new information. PayPal has been using this technique Usbank_splash_main_1practically since inception and we’ve commented on it a number of times in Online Banking Report.

We are now starting to see the technique at other financial institutions. We believe it’s an extremely effective technique for two reasons:

  1. Users are surprised to see a screen they weren’t expecting, so they are naturally curious to find out what’s going on.
  2. Users are forced to navigate past the screen in order to do their banking, usually with a button at the bottom of the screen; so they have little choice but to scan the content.

However, you have to be careful not to overuse it. Anything more than once per month and users will start clicking past it like they do with most advertising intrusions. 

If you are not using this technique, talk to your website development team, or outside platform provider, about how to incorporate it into your online marketing mix.

JB

RF Technology for Online Banking Login?

Chase_blinkNow that Visa, MasterCard, and American Express and others are actively putting so-called contactless cards into the hands of consumers (Chase’s blink for instance), it’s not such a far-fetched thought that these radio-frequency (RF) cards could be used as the extra factor for online banking login.

PCs equipped with RF card readers could read the user’s plastic, allowing the user to log in securely with just a username/password, or conceivably just a password.

But PC makers aren’t going to add card reading technology, no matter how cheap it is, just for online banking. But if merchants began insisting on the RF readers to cut down on card fraud for online purchases, perhaps with the associations agreeing that a purchase made with a PC-based RF reader qualified as a "card present" transaction, then the technology could take off.

Using contactless cards online could be more beneficial than using them for off-line purchases. In the physical world, the contactless card merely saves a few seconds compared to swiping it through a conventional terminal. But online the savings could be more dramatic, potentially allowing the customer to skip typing their card and verification number into a web forms. 

JB

Capital One’s Savings Accounts

Capital_one_savingsWith the success of ING Direct and other direct banks, there has been a lot more attention given to selling savings accounts and certificates online.

One of the new players to watch is Capital One. They are beginning to apply their marketing skills, honed in the brutal credit card market, to deposit products.

Cap_one_google_ad_1Googling "online banking" today, we noticed Capital One in first position on the right-hand sponsored links area (see inset).

Clicking through you are delivered to a page that markets deposit products much more aggressively than most banks (see screenshot below). Capital One leads with a chart showing its rate compared to the national average (see inset above).   

The bank offers five different savings products on the main page, each with its own distinct Open Account button:

  • 3.15% High Yield Savings Account (the lead product at the top)
  • 4.03% No Regrets CDs (allows purchasers to bump-up their rate)
  • 3.25% Money Market Accounts
  • 4.50% Certificates of Deposit
  • 4.29% IRA CDs

Analysis
The relatively high rates (APYs) are a big part of the appeal. But there is more to it than just price.

Capital One does a great job of laying out the options, including:

Capital_one_savings_pageClick on this thumbnail for a look at the main savings page at Capital One.

JB

2004 Online Financial Services Ad Spending

JP Morgan Chase and Citibank led all banking and lending companies in online ad spending according to the most recent American Banker survey of financial services spending (May 2005).

Chase’s $50 million in online advertising was 21% of its entire advertising expense, the highest among major banks, and considerably above the 11% online share across all financial services companies. In comparison, Citi’s $49 million spent online was only 9% of its total advertising expense, slightly below the industry average.

NetBank, the 16th biggest online advertiser, was the percentage leader, funneling all but $100,000 of its $4.9 million in advertising into online initiatives. Two other major online advertisers spent more than half their money online last year: ING Direct spending 60% of its $40 million total online, and MBNA spending more than half its $14 million online.

Lending Tree, Quicken Loans, HSBC, Sovereign and East-West Mortgage all devoted about one-third of their advertising into the online channel.

Top-20 Financial Institutions Online Advertisers*
2004 Online Advertising (% of total advertising)*
1. JP Morgan Chase  $50 million (21%)
2. Citigroup              $49 million (9%)
3. American Express $28 million (9%)
4. Bank of America    $25 million (9%)
5. ING Direct            $24 million (60%)
6. Lending Tree        $22 million (31%)
7. Ameriquest           $16 million (13%)
8. Quicken Loans       $10 million (33%)
9. Wells Fargo           $9.2 million (14%)
10. HSBC                  $8.3 million (39%)
11. MBNA                  $7.0 million (51%)
12. Wachovia            $6.3 million (7%)
13. E-Loan                $6.1 million (21%)
14. NetBank              $4.8 million (98%)
15. Discover             $4.7 million (6%)
16. GM                     $3.8 million (4%)
17. Royal Bank          $3.2 million (12%)
18. Sovereign           $2.8 million (33%)
19. East-West Mtg.    $2.7 million (32%)
20. WAMU                $1.9 million (2%)

*Banking, Lending, Mortgage, or Credit Card segments only, does not include online brokerage, insurance, or investments.

If you look at the brokerage and mutual fund category, the spending accelerates. Four online brokers Ameritrade ($65 million), Scottrade ($63 million), Schwab ($58 million), and E*Trade $52 million) each outspent even the largest financial institution, and Netstock Direct ($32 million) outspent all but Citi and Chase.

Top-10 Brokerage & Mutual Funds

2004 Online Advertising (% of total advertising)

1. Ameritrade   $65 (64%)

2. Scottrade     $63 (87%)                              

3. Schwab        $58 (35%)                              

4. E*Trade        $52 (77%)                              

5. Netstock       $32 (99%)                              

6. Harrisdirect  $24 (78%)                              

7. Vanguard      $12 (31%)                              

8. TD Bank        $10 (17%)                              

9. Fidelity        $5.3 (4%)                               

10. T.Rowe Price $3.8 (5%)

Download the Excel file with more details.    

 

JB                     

Stonebridge and American Bank Offer Secure Account Login

Etrade_rsa_tokenToday's American Banker reports that $365 million-asset Stonebridge Bank (West Chester, PA; $365 million) and American Bank (Allentown, PA; $500 million) are following E*Trade's move to offer hardware tokens to authenticate consumer logins.

As of May 30, Stonebridge is offering the token free-of-charge to any of its 4500 consumers who request one. The token will be mandatory for its 500 business customers. In its security FAQ, the bank says it will charge $25 annually, its out-of-pocket expense for the device, after the first year. They also charge $25 to disconnect the token during the first year and $25 to replace it within 5-7 business days, or $45 total for overnight delivery.

American Bank is sending the token to 1000 customers who said they would like one in a recent survey. There is no charge for the service. The bank expects to order another 1000 from RSA Security next month. It pays approximately $20 each, which does NOT include maintenance costs to operate the system.

Analysis
We applaud these three financial institutions for moving beyond the username/password. However, except for the most demanding customers, primarily businesses, hardware-based solutions are overkill.

The Bank of America/Passmark approach is much better. Not only is it more cost effective, it also much easier to use and also helps prevent the user from logging in at a fake site. 

JB