Will the Troubled Banking Sector Start Pulling Back on Free Consumer Services?

image One thing that’s clear in today’s banking crisis: many credit products were severely underpriced relative to the risk. That means the entire financial services industry must reprice their product lines to get back to a “normal” level of profitability.

For consumers and businesses, that means higher rates, more fees, and most likely fewer free services. One thing that will surely be scaled back is the extensive branch system, which in the United States amounts to one full-service, often elegantly equipped, bank branch for every 1,000 households (see note 1).

But what other free services will disappear? Here are the current freebies that banks will closely examine in coming years. In most cases, the free benefits aren’t going away entirely, they’ll just be available to fewer customers. They are listed in order of most vulnerable to least. 

  • Free online bill payment: In our opinion, across-the-board free bill pay has never made economic sense for most financial institutions (note 2). We expect banks will begin charging the less-profitable portions of their customer base for it. 
  • Free branches on every corner: Branches are a huge, vastly underused, capital expense. There will be significant reductions in this area during the next 20 years (note 1). Branches aren’t going away entirely, but they’ll be far fewer, they will be smaller, and they will charge fees for many services currently offered free of charge.
  • Free credit card annual fees, interest-free grace periods, and rewards: Non-revolving credit card users get a great deal under the current system, 30-to-45 days interest free grace period, plus card rewards, and little or no annual fee. Card issuers, hit by lower borrowing by their prime customers and higher default rates from others, will restrict free services for convenience users.  
  • Free mailed statements: As the cost to mail statements continues to rise along with the percent of customers with online access, this freebie is destined for extinction. As with most benefits transitioning from free to fee, less-profitable households will see the fees first.
  • Free telephone customer service: Telephone customer support is relatively inexpensive compared to branches since most routine questions are answered automatically and human support can be outsourced to lower labor-cost areas. But we expect that free human customer service will eventually be limited to the more profitable households, with others paying per-use or annual fees.
  • Free ATM usage: Most banks will continue to offer free ATM use across their own networks, but will probably add qualifying criteria, such as minimum balances, debit card usage, direct deposit, and/or estatement usage.
  • Free checking: Because “free” checking isn’t really free after factoring in penalty fees and cross sales, it’s not likely to disappear from a bank’s marketing toolkit. However, unprofitable customers will see even more fees tacked on to their accounts, such as per-use charges for branch services, telephone support, etc.
  • Free online/mobile banking access: Online and mobile access is an inexpensive service to provide and is likely to remain free for most customers. However, we expect banks and credit unions to begin offering upscale “gold” versions that will carry annual/monthly fees for more benefits.

Notes:
1. For our take on the future of bricks and mortar, see Online Banking Report: The Decline of the Branch.
2. For more info on pricing bill pay and other online services, see Online Banking Report on Pricing.

Loanio Shuts Down (updated with statement from Loanio)

image It’s 3 for 3 now. All major P2P U.S. peer-to-peer lenders have been shut down this year by the SEC (see note 1). First Lending Club in March, then Prosper Oct. 15, and finally Loanio this week (see note 1).

Here is the statement I received from Loanio founder Michael Solomon this afternoon:

In light of the recent cease-and-desist ruling issued to Prosper Marketplace by the Securities and Exchange Commission, Loanio voluntarily suspended its operations. We were not contacted by the SEC or any other government agency. The SEC ruling on Prosper, combined with the recent registration of Lending Club, removes all ambiguities as to the Commission’s legal interpretation on the issue of whether P2P promissory notes, in all of their varieties, are considered securities under current law.

Regulators have concluded that loans created in these networks are, in fact, securities and must be registered as such. You can read the SEC’s logic in its Prosper filing published this week (here).

I have mixed feelings. While I applaud regulators for taking the initiative to understand this new way of lending/investing, I find it a bit ironic that a $100-million self-regulating and relatively transparent marketplace receives heavy-handed treatment while multi-trillion dollar financial products grew relatively unchecked in recent years (see my prior editorial on the matter).

The good news is that Lending Club has proven that SEC registration need not be a death sentence. The startup successfully completed the registration process after six months, relaunching at our Finovate event Oct. 14. The company has funded $2.6 million in loans since reopening.

We are hopeful that Prosper, which has $40 million in venture funding, will be back in business in early first quarter. Angel-funded Loanio may need to raise money to finance the registration process.

image

Notes:
1. Last month (here), the Loanio founder predicted that at some point he’d also need to register with the SEC.

2. Fynanz and GreenNote, the P2P student loan lenders, appear to still be accepting lender funds.

BancVue/FirstROI Launches Checking Finder

image FirstROI, a division of Austin, TX-based BancVue (previous coverage here) launched its CheckingFinder service June 2. FinovateStartup attendees received a sneak peak in April and rewarded it with a Best of Show award (video here). The innovative service helps consumers find the best BancVue-powered rewards checking account based on geographic location, APY, or total return (see second screenshot below).

How it Works
finovatestartup_bestinshow_2008The first challenge is getting customers to the site. FirstROI is investing heavily in Google AdWords to get the word out. For example, a search on “checking accounts” at Google today (note 1), displayed CheckingFinder in second place, trailing only BofA (see screenshot below).

As a relative newcomer to AdWords, the company’s bid price would have to be high to score the second slot over such big names as Schwab (#3), HSBCdirect (#4), Key Bank (#5), WaMu (#6), Chase (#10) and Wells Fargo (#11). CheckingFinder may very well be paying more than BofA, depending on how Google’s ad-positioning algorithm weighs its relevance.

image

Clicking the AdWords link results in a list of banks presorted by closest distance to the IP address used to search Google (see next screenshot). Unfortunately, the closest participating BancVue client, Altra Federal Credit Union, is 1043 miles away
(see note 2).

CheckingFinder from BancVue and FirstROI

You can also sort the results by rate (APY) or plug in an estimated checking account balance and ATM usage and have the results sorted by highest annual return
(see note 3).

After selecting the account you prefer, users land on a page that lays out the offer in more detail and includes a bright green “open now” bar at the bottom of the page and another open button in the webpage bullseye, the upper-right corner. The online account opening process is powered by Andera.

image

Summary
Overall, it’s a good “micro” search engine, helping users quickly find the best checking account from the company’s client base. The big downside from a consumer perspective is that it’s currently limited to just 60 participating BancVue reward-checking clients. It will be more effective if they can get more of their 400+ banks and credit unions on board.

While I think most consumers will understand that they are searching a subset of available checking accounts, I think BancVue should disclose a bit more about its relationship with the financial institutions listed. That fact is touched on in the About Us section, but the FAQs don’t address this, nor are there any direct links back to BancVue or FirstROI. 

Notes:

1. Google search conducted from Seattle IP address at 1 PM Pacific time, 17 June 2008.

2. Verity Credit Union, which is about 4 miles from my home, is a BancVue client, but their reward-checking account, Velocity Checking, is currently paying a short-term teaser rate of 6.75% to celebrate its 75th anniversary (APY updated 20 June per Shari’s comment). When Verity returns to its normal 5% APY, its account will be available through CheckingFinder. There is also a slightly closer California bank participating, Tri Counties Bank, but it is not marketing to Seattle residents, so I don’t see it in my CheckingFinder results page.  

3. Jeffry Pilcher, who recently left Weber Marketing to found his own consultancy, ICONiQ, is also blogging at The Financial Brand. He cautions that the days of differentiating your brand with “reward checking” has passed in many markets.

MoneyAisle Launches Real-time Deposit Auctions, a Potentially Disruptive Technology

image If you were to sit down with a blank piece of paper and design the perfect friction-free system for determining deposit rates, your invention would almost certainly include some type of competitive bidding. Over the years we’ve seen several banks test eBay-style auctions including PNC Bank, WaMu, and most recently Zions Direct. Those incorporated a traditional auction model, with the bank putting a deposit up for auction and selling it to the highest bidding consumer.

The latest entrant into auction-style finance, is MoneyAisle, a deposit marketplace from neoSaej, that launched today. MoneyAisle employs a reverse auction, where the consumer offers to buy an item, in this case a deposit of a certain size, and sellers bid against each other to offer the best price, in this case the highest interest rate.

In theory, MoneyAisle comes closest to the perfect deposit-pricing model. It’s right out of the Economics 101 textbook. If they can get enough buyers and sellers to make it work, it could cause a serious disruption in the market for so-called high-yield savings accounts and certificates of deposit (CDs).

I really like the auction model, but there are some obstacles for it to overcome on its way to market dominance. Here are a few that come to mind: 

1. How to convince users that it’s in their best interest to take the rate offered at the end of the auction? The first thing I did after seeing the 3.1% offer was to type in www.ingdirect.com and see how it compared. And given that ING was just a bit less, 3.0%, it’s hard to get excited about opening a new account with an unknown bank for just 10 more basis points. Or worse yet, type “high yield savings rates” into Google and see five advertisers that can beat the 3.1% (see Google screenshot below).

2. How to make the auction’s feel “real?” It seems like a game, which is not necessarily bad. Users choose a deposit product, $ amount, and their state of residence, then spin the dial. Then in real time you watch the results as banks bid against each other for your money (see Step 2 screenshot below). Then after 60 seconds or so, the winner is displayed (see Step 3 screenshot below) and you can proceed to make your deposit, provided you are satisfied with the rate and the bank making the offer. 

3. How to keep one bank from dominating the bidding? If the lowest-cost bank, or the one most skilled at cross-selling, or the one most in need of deposits, consistently bids “above-market” rates, will the remaining banks stay in the game?

4. How do you compete with the offers available via Google AdWords, another type of auction (see below)?

image

How it Works
After registering with a bare minimum of info (username, password, and security question only), it’s a simple three-step process that couldn’t be easier:

1. Decide whether you want a high-yield savings account or a CD (see step 1, screenshot below)

2. Start the auction (see step 2, screenshot below) and participating banks bid in real time via a preprogrammed, proxy bidding system

3. A few minutes later, accept the winning rate and arrange for account opening with the winning bank (see step 3, screenshot below)

In testing today, 51 banks bid on my high-yield savings account (at just after midnight Pacific Time) and 72 bid on a 1-year CD (at 5 PM Pacific Time). We were offered identical 3.1% APYs for a $5,000 savings account in Washington state and a $50,000 one in New York. When we ran an actual savings-account auction after registering, the winning bidder was Massachusetts-based Beverly National Bank with again, a 3.1% rate (see note 1). A $25,000 1-year CD in Washington earned a top bid of 3.90% by Michigan-based Isabella Bank, similar to the best rate advertised on Google.

MoneyAisle step 1: Choose a deposit product

image


Step 2: Watch as banks go through several rounds of bidding to reach the final rate

image


Step 3: Confirm you want the rate within 30 minutes and complete the rest of the form; the winning bank then contacts the customer to complete the transaction

image

Note:

1. The bank’s bid was more than double its published rate for a $20,000 deposit. But Beverly does currently pay 3.0% APY on $100,000 balances. When I reran the auction at 5PM Pacific Time, the bid was 30 basis points higher, 3.4% from Umbrella Bank.

Tax Prep 2.0: Does H&R Block’s Tango Provide a New Model for Pricing Online Financial Services?

imageFive days from the U.S. income tax deadline, tax prep ads are everywhere. I don't usually notice them because I still file the old-fashioned way, via CPA (note 1) and paper check. However, yesterday I noticed H&R Block's banner strung across the top of TechCrunch (screenshot below).

It caught my eye for a several reasons:

  • 24/7 access to live tax help, a real benefit to the legions of last-minute filers.
  • The "Tango" branding really intrigued me. How could a tax service be interesting enough to have its own brand, especially one as off-beat as Tango (note 2)?

The Tango product, complete with YouTube videos, <wannatango.com> URL, and more, deserves a post of its own, but here I want to focus on Block's pricing/segmentation.

The tax-prep giant divided its online services into two distinct categories, both catering to the computer savvy do-it-yourself crowd. Block calls the segments: "Do it Myself" and "Do it With Me" (screenshot below) with pricing as follows:

Do it myself:

  • $14.95 for 1040EZ
  • $29.95 for 1040 with itemized deductions
  • $59.95 for 1040 with state return

Do it with me:

  • $70 Tango option — complete online and submit yourself with unlimited 24/7 support (includes state return)
  • $99.95 (+$34.95 for state) complete yourself and then route to an H&R Block agent to review and e-file
  • $99.95 (+$34.95 for state) and above (note 3) to fill out an online questionaire and submit your data to have someone at H&R Block complete the return for you

image

NetBanker strategic action item
Banks, take notice. Block's pricing strategy is brilliant and if applied to online banking, could revive the difficult business case. Online banking, like electronic tax prep, is a mature business, and has long ago proven itself as valuable and convenient.

Now it's time to cash in on that convenience. While levying fees across the board would create customer ill-will, it's possible to segment your online banking base into customers who want plain vanilla services for free and those that want the best, and are willing to pay for it. Block's Tango is a good example of how to price for those who want to go it alone for the lowest cost and those that want high-tech online services AND high-touch tech support.

A bank or credit union could mimic the Block program:

  • Do it myself (FREE): Download data, set up my bills, create triggered alerts, monitor my own security settings, read my own credit report, store my own statements on my hard drive, and so on
  • Do it with me ($5/mo): 24/7 access to an online specialist who will provide advice, assistance, and help doing any of the above. Added bonus: lifetime storage of all transactions, statements, and check images!!!

Call it VIP Banking and start turning online banking into a profit center. With dedicated fee income you will have fewer problems during the looming crisis in online banking measurement

For more on online banking pricing and how to develop a premium-priced online banking service, see our Online Banking Report: Pricing – The "Fee" vs. "Free" Controversy (#109).
 

H&R Block Banner on TechCrunch (9 April 2008, 1 PM Pacific)

H&R Block Tango advertised on TechCrunch

Landing page from TechCrunch banner (9 April 2008)

H&R Block landing page from TechCrunch banner

Tango homepage (9 April 2008)

H&R Block Tango home

Notes:

1. In testing Turbotax and TaxCut, I have found both to be intuitive and surprisingly easy to use, even for relatively complicated returns with business deductions. This year, I did my teen's return on the free TurboTax online site, which was very slick. My son's already deposited his $2 refund into his online bank account.

2. H&R Block's Tango actually has a Wikipedia listing (within the H&R Block entry). That's something you don't see too often. According to Wikipedia, the Tango service first appeared last year for 2006 returns, but was plagued by computer glitches that forced the company to issue refunds. But it received good reviews this year, scoring an 82 here, just two points less than leader TurboTax Online. Tango finished ahead of the other four sites reviewed (here).

3. My federal returns would cost $199.80 through this most expensive option, about $500 less than my CPA.

BancVue Alters the Checking Value Proposition, Powering High-Yield "Reward" Checking Accounts at 350 FIs

For someone whose job it is to stay on top of innovations in financial services, I hate to admit I'm late to the party on the so-called "reward checking" phenomena. Last year, I'd noticed a number of smaller financial institutions launching high-yield checking accounts, but I hadn't realized it was a national trend primarily powered by a single bank tech supplier, Austin, Texas-based BancVue (see note 1).

According to a November BankRate article, more than 350 U.S. banks and credit unions now offer so-called "reward checking accounts" powered by BancVue with 30 new ones coming on board each month. These checking accounts usually pay high rates of interest, typically 6%, if users meet high levels of electronic banking activity each month.

Typical requirements to earn the high yield:

  • 10 to 12 debit card transactions each month
  • Electronic statements (no paper)
  • Online banking usage

Typically, the following benefits are paid ONLY when the above requirements are met:

  • 5% to 6% interest on the first $25,000 to $40,000 in balances
  • ATM refunds up to $10 to $15/mo

And most seem to include:

  • No monthly fees regardless of activity or balance levels, so the account can be marketed as "free"

Marketing
Another distinguishing characteristic of these accounts is the innovative marketing and website design. With the help of BancVue, smaller banks and credit unions are able to offer a level of design and pizzazz that meets or exceeds the typical megabank high-budget program.

Here are some of the more interesting BancVue-powered programs we've looked at (screenshots follow):

  • Velocity Checking <velocitychecking.com> from Seattle's Verity Credit Union
    Earn 6.01% on balances up to $40,000 and receive ATM refunds up to $25 when meeting the following monthly requirements:
    – 12 debit transactions
    – 1 online banking login
    – electronic statement in lieu of paper
  • Turbo Checking <turbochecking.com> from New Mexico's Charter Bank
    Earn 6.01% on balances up to $25,000 and ATM refunds when meeting the following monthly requirements:
    – 10 debit transactions
    – receipt of 1 direct payroll deposit or other automated ACH deposit
    – 1 login to online banking
    – electronic statement in lieu of paper

And our favorite, which substitutes iTunes downloads for the high-yield benefit:

  • FreeTunes Checking <freetuneschecking.com> from Oregon Community Credit Union (see note 2)
    Earns 4 free iTunes downloads each month provided the following are met:
    – 12 debit transactions
    – 1 login to online banking
    – electronic statement in lieu of paper

Screenshots

Velocity Checking from Verity Credit Union

Turbo Checking from Charter Bank

FreeTunes Checking from Oregon Community Credit Union

Notes:

1. I began researching this area after reading Verity Credit Union CMO Shari Storm's recent blog post (here) about how she'd changed her payments behavior to make the 12 monthly debits required for its Velocity Checking.

2. Oregon Community Credit Union also offers a high-yield version, Remarkable Checking, that substitutes a 5.05% APY on all checking account balances instead of the free music. Monthly account requirements are the same. 

Prosper Increases its Loan Fee by 100%

As noted in our recent research report on the P2P lending market (here), the exchanges need to boost revenues to remain viable. Even with scale, a 1% borrower fee and 1% servicing fee just don't provide enough revenue with the relatively small loan sizes currently being funded.

For example, using Prosper's previous pricing on a typical $7,000 loan, about $130 would be earned in the first year, then another $50 for the remaining two years of the loan (see note 1), for a maximum of $230 in lifetime revenues per loan.

So until loan sizes increase dramatically as secured notes become more common, Prosper has raised its prices for the core portion of its loan demand, the alt-prime and subprime portion. The company left its superprime, class AA price alone because it competes with banks and credit unions for this type of borrower.  

As you can see from the table below, most loan-origination fees increased by 1 point, although C and D loans were increased 2 points. Looking at the company's mix of business during the first half of 2007, the new pricing would have doubled its loan-origination revenue from about $500,000 to just over $1 million. The weighted average fee under the prior pricing was 1.2%, compared to 2.4% under the new formula.

Here's the new price plan effective Jan 4, 2008, as announced in the Prosper blog (here):

Type   New Price   Previous  Change  Avg Loan*  Avg Loan Fee* 
Prime  
  AA           1%               1%             none             $9,000            $90
  A             2%               1%            +1 point         $10,300         $210
Near Prime
  B             2%                1%           +1 point         $9,800          $200
  C             3%                1%           +2 points       $8,400           $250
  D             3%                1%           +2 points       $6,500           $195
Sub-prime
  E             3%                2%            +1 point        $4,500          $135
  HR           3%                2%            +1 point        $3,000           $90

Weighted
  Average*** 2.4%          1.2%

*Average loan size during the first half of 2007 per company
**Loan-origination fee deducted from proceeds of loan; there is no fee if the loan does not get funded
***Using the loan mix from the first half of 2007

Note:
1. It depends how the servicing fee is calculated. At Prosper, it's calculated on the outstanding loan balance which for a $7,000 loan averages approximately $6,000 in year 1, $3,750 in year 2 and $1,250 in year 3.

Mobile Access May Be New Anchor for Fee-Based Premium Online Banking

What's the biggest obstacle to online banking innovation in the United States? No, it's not security, ease of use, or customer education. The biggest problem is lack of fee income.

Unfortunately, online banking came of age in a golden time for U.S. financial institutions, with rate spreads at historical highs, customer loyalty at a peak, and fee income on the rise.

Banks, flush with profits in most business lines, decided not to bother with the difficult task of wringing fee income out of the new channel. So we ended up with near-universal adoption of the FREE model despite little economic justification for the subsidy. Sure, online banking customers are more profitable, but so are safe deposit customers. And you don't offer those free across the board.

The results are predictable. With online banking being cash-flow negative, many management teams have under invested in the online channel, while subsequently over investing in branches (see Online Banking Report #128, The Demise of the Branch). 

Fighting free
There is no way to eliminate free online banking altogether, but you can nip away at the edges, convincing some customers to voluntarily pay fees for value-added services. 

One promising avenue is converting users into a premium, fee-based online banking option, the same way American Express convinces its members to increase their annual membership fee two-fold by trading up to a Gold Card.

But in order to convince customers to voluntarily give up their free service, the fee-based version must have compelling benefits. The following three hot areas could be used to anchor a platinum online banking service. The first two we've looked at before (see previous coverage here), but mobile banking is the newcomer that offers much promise:

  1. Unlimited storage: Taking a cue from Google's Gmail that offers virtually unlimited email storage, banks should allow their gold-account customers to permanently archive e-statements, transactions, and images for no additional charge. Everyone else sees their transactions disappear after a few months. And every month, right before erasing another month of data, provide customers with an opportunity to upgrade to premium banking (see Online Banking Report #118, Lifetime Statement Archives).
  2. Unlimited credit report access: The second most powerful premium benefit is simple online access to credit reports directly from within the logged-in online banking area. Users could assess their previously downloaded report at any time, and order a new one several times per year. In addition, customers would be protected by daily credit bureau account monitoring (see Online Banking Report #83/84, Credit Report Monitoring & Identity Protection).
  3. Full interactive mobile access: While the previous two items are relatively easy to do today, in the United States, the mobile market is just revving up with Cingular's recent announcement to add a banking application to its mobile "desktop." We've seen a live demo using a real bank account, and it's impressive. The partners on the service are Firethorn and Checkfree (see upcoming Online Banking Report #138, due out in late January 2007).

Any premium online banking program should include one or more of these three core, value-added services. Then, additional minor services, such as security alerts, can be layered on to further differentiate premium banking from plain-old banking (POB).

For more information about online banking pricing and premium service offerings, see Online Banking Report #109, Pricing

Fee Income Opportunities from SMS Alerts

Ebay_logo_1While most banks in the world charge fees for at least some aspect of online banking, the service has been almost entirely fee free in the United States, at least ever since Bank of America rolled out free bill payment in 2002.

At first glance, it seems like a great deal for consumers; however, the lack of direct revenue has hampered investment in the channel and deprived U.S. customers from the more sophisticated services common throughout the world, such as SMS alerts, multi-factor log-in controls, and so on.

Ebay_sms_alert_mainWe're always on the lookout for fee-based opportunities (see Online Banking Report 122/123 for a laundry list of online fee opportunities), and we are encouraged by eBay's latest innovation, SMS auction alerts with a fee of $0.25 per auction. This is the first time eBay has attempted to charge fees to bidders. The site has offered free email alerts since the beginning.   

Here's how SMS alerts work (see screenshot below):

  1. Ebay_sms_alert Select "Get SMS alert" (see red circle in screenshot at above, click to enlarge).
  2. Select mobile phone provider from drop-down list and enter mobile phone number; currently Cingular, Verizon, Nextel, Alltel, Sprint, and TCRcom participate
  3. Check "Watched item ending alert" or "Outbid alert"
  4. Click "Continue" which initiates a confirmation message to the user's mobile phone
  5. Send a text-message reply from the mobile back to eBay to agree to the charges

SMS-alert users pay $0.25 for each auction entitling them to up to 10 alerts. Each 10 thereafter cost another $0.25. It would be unusual for the number of alerts to exceed 10. After receiving an alert, users can submit a new bid via text message by responding to the text message with their new bid amount. Bidding can be protected with an optional PIN.

Instant messaging alerts work in a similar manner (click on screenshot for closeup):

  1. Ebay_im_alert_main_1 Select "Get IM alert" 
  2. Select IM provider; eBay supports the big three: Yahoo, AOL, MSN
  3. Check "Watched item-ending alert" or "Outbid alert"

There are no fees for IM alerts. After receiving an IM alert, users can submit a new bid via the provided link.

In addition to SMS-alert links in the main auction listings, successful bidders are also prompted to set up an alert on the bidder's confirmation screen (see below).

Ebay_sms_alerts

What it means for financial institutions
There is no reason why banks cannot charge for triggered alerts. Unlike account access, alerts are a value-added service with no sQwest_premium_menuimilar "free counterpart" in the offline world. You don't see telecom giants giving away any of their specialized services such as caller-id, custom ringing, call forwarding and so on. Banks should work on developing premium service bundles. For inspiration, take a look at your local phone provider's website (see Qwest screenshot right).

Resources:

Provident Bank Launches Premium Option

Provbank_premium_featuresBaltimore-based Provident Bank <provbank.com> with $4 billion on deposit from 590,000 accounts, is the largest U.S. bank to segment its online banking access into two levels, My Account Online and Premium Internet Banking with Bill Payment.

As the name suggests, the primary difference is bill payment. But also the premium version provides a combined statement whereas the basic version still requires separate logins for
each product. Premium also allows downloading into Quicken/Money (click on inset for an account comparison).

Basic online banking is free; premium is priced at $5.95/month, a popular price point in the days before bill payment became free. The bank encourages trial of the premium service with a generous 6-month fee-free period.

Analysis
It’s a good start, but it would be more effective if the premium version had more benefits such as extra service, more security, longer archives, and so on. The bank also needs to support the product better with website graphics, copywriting, and imagery that reinforces the premium image.

Reference: See OBR 109, for a report on online banking segmentation.

JB

Premium Banking Examples

1st_source_premium_bankingFor years, whenever we needed to show an example of product line segmentation, we’ve used 1st Source Bank’s Premium Online Banking, a $6/mo upgrade for users if its free online banking service.

Our most recent research uncovered several more examples:

American Savings Bank
Free: Online Banking
Free: Online Banking Plus
$5.85/mo: Online Banking Premium

North Shore Bank
Free: Epay
$5.95/mo: All Pay

We’ll be covering this subject in great detail as numerous premium online banking programs are launched during the next few years. For more information on multi-level pricing, refer to Online Banking Report #109, published in August 2004.

–JB

The “Fee vs. Free” Controversy

Free bill payment. It seems inevitable. With Bank of America and other
U.S. mega-banks flogging free bill payment 24/7 , is it possible to still charge
a fee and remain competitive?

We believe you can and should charge bill payment fees to at
least a portion of your online banking base. But you need to expand the list of
features and benefits for the fee-based option to distinguish it from free
services offered by other banks.

Eventually, you will likely divide your online banking base into two or more
segments. The FREE entry-level service receives the usual laundry list of online
banking benefits. The premium level qualifies for an even longer list of
benefits, most notably, pay-anyone bill payment. However, premium customers pay
monthly fees ranging from $5 to $10 or annual fees in the $50 to $100 range

The key to making this work is to get away from calling the monthly charge a
“bill payment fee.” That doesn’t stack up well with BofA and other major banks.
Instead, position the premium service as something with MORE VALUE for
online-savvy households. Make sure there are easily discernable differences
between basic and premium, other than bill payment, for example more extensive
archives or more security options. 

04-aug-a1.jpg

If you are going to give up $60/yr in fee income, make sure you let visitors
know. HSBC has two banners on its Personal Internet Banking page.

 

 

If you do find it necessary to match the big banks with a free pay-anyone
offering, we recommend the Wells Fargo approach. Dole out free bill
payment judiciously, as an incentive to encourage customers to increase
balances, adopt e-statements, or add an overdraft line of credit. 

 

— Jim Bruene, Editor & Founder
jim@netbanker.com