Loans & Credit Archives - Page 5 of 11

Receivables Exchange Launching Auction Platform for Financing Accounts Receivables

By Jim Bruene Posted on November 11, 2008
Categories: Auction platforms, Launches, Loans & Credit, Receivables Exchange, Small Business

A new financial market will open Monday where businesses as small as $1.5 million in annual sales can borrow against their receivables with prices set in an auction market.

New Orleans-based The Receivables Exchange opens for trades on Monday (17 Nov) after an 18-month development cycle.

Businesses register with the exchange, a process that entails uploading financial statements and completing an application. The Receivables Exchange conducts due diligence on the potential participant to ensure that it is legitimate.

Businesses must meet the following criteria:

Minimum of $1.5 million in annual sales
At least 2 years of operating history
Registered to do business in the United States

Upon approval, the business can list specific invoices for financing, with a minimum total value of $10,000. Then accredited investors (SEC definition here) bid to provide short-term financing until the receivables are collected. Sellers are encouraged to upload PDF copies of invoices, proof of delivery, and so on to get the best rates. However, many documentation requirements are optional.

Sellers select the terms they are willing to accept and the bidder that beats those terms by the widest margin wins the credit. If no bidder meets the minimum terms, the auction ends without a trade.

Co-founders: Justin A. Brownhill and Nicolas R. Perkin

VC backers: Prism VentureWorks LLC and Fidelity Ventures

Analysis
In an era of tight credit, it's a welcome addition to the financing tools available for small and mid-sized businesses. Larger businesses typically have more options through commercial paper and other capital markets.

The startup expects banks to be valuable sources of referrals. Although, at this point, there are no referral fees or revenue-sharing options.

So far, The Receivables Exchange has signed up sellers with a total of $2 billion in annual sales. And there's been a lot of interest. Founder Nicolas Perkin says his company has been approached by 20 $1+ billion companies.

But what about the other side of the trade, the lender/investor? The company says it has access to $8 billion deployable capital. Of course, that doesn't mean that the capital will be easily enticed into actual deals.

Starting Monday, we'll see what the buy side thinks. Are they willing to risk their capital in the unproven market? If The Receivables Exchange can drive out fraud and deliver on its promises, we think the answer will be yes.

The Receivables Exchange homepage (11 Nov 2008)

Share this:

Send Post Twitter LinkedIn Facebook

E-Loan to Stop Direct Mortgage Lending but Will Maintain Loan Portal/Referral Business

By Jim Bruene Posted on October 24, 2008
Categories: E-Loan, E*Trade, Lead Generation, LendingTree, Loans & Credit, NetBank, NextCard

In the early commercial Web era (1995 to 1998), five financial startups inspired me in terms of their innovative products and services:

E-Loan for mortgage
E*Trade for stock brokerage
Netbank for deposit-taking
NextCard for credit cards
LendingTree for lead generation

These were my go to companies for ideas and inspiration when covering the space in the mid-to-late 1990s. In those days, traditional financial institutions were just getting started and were not as far along in features and functionality.

Sadly, two of the five have failed, NextCard in 2002 (here) and NetBank in 2007 (here). And the other three are struggling through the credit crisis.

The latest downer: This week, E-Loan, owned by Banco Popular, announced its exit from the online mortgage origination business. Reading the headlines, I first thought they’d thrown in the towel altogether. But it turns out they are discontinuing only direct mortgage originations. The company will continue to use its popular website (see traffic below) to attract potential borrowers who are handed off to other lenders, something it already does today for student, auto, personal and business loans, along with credit cards. This is a potentially lucrative fee-based business with zero credit risk.

It’s a cautionary tale of how critical, and difficult, the execution piece is. These were industry darlings, always in the news and at the top of the search results. Yet, in financial services especially, you have to temper innovation with prudent underwriting and business practices. All three were brought down by credit-related problems.

E-Loan traffic has stabilized at around 250,000 uniques per month:

Share this:

Send Post Twitter LinkedIn Facebook

P2P Lender Prosper Closes Marketplace to Lenders; Loanio Unaffected for Now

By Jim Bruene Posted on October 16, 2008
Categories: Lending Club, Loanio, Loans & Credit, P2P Lending, Prosper

I was packing up my hotel room after five great days in NYC putting on Finovate, when I got a call from a reporter who asked me if I’d “heard the news.” Since we’d been talking P2P lending earlier in the week, I figured his question was related to that. But I couldn’t imagine what news could compete with the launch of Loanio, the closing of Zopa (US), the delayed launch of Pertuity Direct, and the grand reopening of Lending Club. That was already a full year’s worth of major developments packed into a two-week period.

So I about fell off the bed when he told me Prosper had closed off new lending until the completion of its SEC registration process, entering the same regulatory twilight zone from which Lending Club had just emerged the previous day. And this was only 14 hours after Chris Larsen had been quoted in an upbeat Prosper company blog entry about the role of his company during the credit crunch (note 1):

“At a time when every sector in the economy seems to be under pressure and shrinking, the growth Prosper has experienced is very respectable.”

Impact on Loanio
Because I’d just spent an hour with Loanio founder Michael Solomon the day before at our Finovate conference, I immediately wondered if he might be facing the same registration hurdle. But I reached him a few minutes ago via email and he’s thinking this probably benefits his new marketplace since lenders are frozen out of Prosper. He also doesn’t expect to enter into a similar registration process in the foreseeable future.

Here’s his full statement:

“…from the perspective of (Prosper) going silent, it is actually great for us as I think we will quickly gain lots of lenders and hopefully we can wow them into sticking around. From a regulatory standpoint, we believe that at some point we will seek to introduce a secondary market platform, but we will focus the greater part of the next 12 months on building our platform and seeking out a national bank partner to cover the rest of the U.S. Our plans for a secondary market are too far ahead for me to contemplate at this time.”

Thoughts
Regulators certainly have a right to require transparency in the marketplace and protection for consumers. But Prosper, with an open API of its transactions, balances and even repayment behavior, and which uses a completely market-driven, open-bidding process to set rates and select loans to fund, is about as open a business as you ever will see, especially in financial services.

For the sake of the nascent industry, I hope the registration is put on a fast track and Prosper is back in the game faster than the six months Lending Club waited. At this point, an alternative credit supply, albeit only $100+ million per year right now (note 2), sourced directly from willing individual investors and not from capital-constrained financial institutions, seems like something we should encourage.

Ultimately, Lending Club and now Prosper should benefit from improved liquidity that the secondary market allows. Since Prosper is not allowed to comment on the move, we can only speculate on what happened. But the timing of all this seems a bitter irony. Wasn’t a breakdown in the secondary markets a big part of what put us in such a bind now?

According to its blog, Prosper will continue to make loans “through alternative sources (of funds)” (note 3). So perhaps the impact to the Prosper marketplace will be small. Especially if they are back in full swing by year-end or early 2009.

Notice on Prosper’s website announcing quiet period (isn’t that an oxymoron?) 16 Oct. 2008

Notes:
1. See today’s NY Times article for more info on this week’s developments. Don’t miss the picture of Lending Club CEO Renaud Laplanche standing outside the Finovate 2008 demo hall.

2. For more info on the market, see our Online Banking Report on Person-to-Person Lending.

3. Presumably, to keep the loans flowing, Prosper can tap its own funds as well as those of institutional investors or other professional investors. We’ll know soon, thanks to its open API.

Share this:

Send Post Twitter LinkedIn Facebook

Zopa to Close U.S. Operation

By Jim Bruene Posted on October 9, 2008
Categories: Lead Generation, Loans & Credit, Zopa

Article updated at 2 PM Pacific with quote from one of Zopa’s partner CUs, Affinity Plus.

Zopa’s U.S. social deposit/lending site will be shuttered, just 10 months after its launch (see previous coverage here). The site, which delivered loan applications and CD customers to six credit union partners, apparently was closed by Zopa. At this point the exact reason is unclear (see update below). Zopa blamed the U.S. credit situation and said it wanted to concentrate its efforts in other markets.

Here’s part of the statement from CEO Doug Dolton that appeared on the Zopa forum earlier today (also here’s the official blog entry at Zopa UK):

The facts are: Due to the extremely difficult consumer credit circumstances in the US, we made the decision to focus our ongoing efforts in the UK, Italy and Japan. We have six credit union partners in the US, and we have been working with them to modify our business model to offer our customers the best possible offerings, given the poor credit conditions in the US.

We’re certainly facing unprecedented economic times worldwide right now, but I am pleased to report that our UK and Italian operations are doing better than ever, and I look forward to continuing to develop those marketplaces. I apologise for any confusion regarding our circumstances.

As of this morning, the Zopa US homepage is unchanged, but you can no longer sign up as a new member and all the Learn More links redirect to USA Federal Credit Union.

Implications
It’s surprising that the company would throw in the towel on the significant investment it made here. However, if Zopa’s CU lending partners had curtailed, or stopped, making loans through the site, something noticed last week by the Prosper Lending Review blog, the whole strategy would no longer be viable (see update below).

But this has nothing to do with what Prosper, Loanio (which launched last week) and hopefully Lending Club (expected be accepting new lenders shortly) are doing with person-to-person lending. Zopa US, unlike Zopa UK, was NOT a P2P lending site, it was a lead-generation site for six credit unions. When those CUs stopped needing loan-leads due to the credit crunch, it took the legs out from under the U.S. division. Even continuing to just take deposits made no sense, since each depositor was required to assist a borrower by gifting a portion of the deposit interest.

We wouldn’t be surprised to see Zopa back in United States in the future as a true P2P lending site, copying the model of its U.K. and Italian divisions. The social aspect of its offering certainly resonated with consumers and industry players as well. The company was one of four Best of Show winners in our April Finovate Startup conference, an award by majority vote from the audience (video here).

For more information, see our Online Banking Report on Person-to-Person Lending. And those attending our Finovate next week will see two companies demo P2P lending.

Update: 2 PM PDT, 9 Oct 2008

As one of the credit unions who were partnered with Zopa, I would like to clarify that we have no credit availability issues and have changed none of our lending practices. This decision was made by Zopa.

— Sarah Mason, SVP, Affinity Plus Credit Union

Share this:

Send Post Twitter LinkedIn Facebook

Loanio Launches New Person-to-Person Lending Service

By Jim Bruene Posted on October 1, 2008
Categories: Launches, Loanio, Loans & Credit, P2P Lending

Add one more company to the list of recent launches: Loanio went live today after a lengthy “coming soon” process (previous coverage here). The thousands of people on its email list received a message this morning announcing the launch (see below).

Founder Michael Solomon demo’d the product back in April at our Finovate Startup event (video here). Today’s live version looks similar to the April build. The key differentiating features of Loanio’s product are:

Ability for anyone to borrow, if they have a creditworthy co-borrower
Optional enhanced pre-verification process (costs $35 for single borrower, $45 for co-borrower apps) allows borrows to boost their credibility by submitting the following documentation in advance of posting their listing:
– Photo ID
– Income documentation
– Bank account statement
– Employment documentation
– Postal address documentation
Longer loan terms
— up to 5 years compared to P2P lending standard of 36 months
Borrowers have the option of accepting partial funding of their loan request as long as it’s at least 35% funded

Several other tidbits from the FAQs:

Experian provides the credit info on borrowers
Lenders pay a 1% service fee on all outstanding loans
Buyers pay an origination fee as follows, equal to the greater of $95 or:
— Loans with one borrower: 2% for A and B credit grades, 3% for all others
— Loans with co-borrower: 3% for A, B and 4% for all others
Borrowers may seek loans of $1,000 to $25,000
Lenders must put in at least $100 to participate with a minimum bid amount of $50

The first borrower listing appeared on the site within the last hour or so, a C-grade credit seeking $2800 for debt consolidation (see screenshot below, note 1).

Screenshot of Loanio home page with first loan listing (1 Oct 2008)

State coverage limited
At launch, Loanio has gathered licenses to lend in only 22 states (see note 2). However, 10 of those have interest rate caps of 12% or less, so lending will be limited to the highly credit worthy, and one (Minnesota) caps the loan amount at $2550. Here are the 12 states which Loanio primarily competes in today:

State         Max Interest Rate

Alabama 30%

Georgia 30%

Mississippi     30%

New Mexico      30%

North Carolina 30%

Indiana 21%

West Virginia 18%

Wisconsin 18%

Alaska 16%

Nebraska           16%

New Jersey 16%

New York 16%

These are the 10 states that allow borrowing from Loanio but cap the rate so that only those with excellent credit are likely to receive funding:

State Max Interest Rate

Tennessee 12.25%

Hawaii 12%

Louisiana 12%

South Carolina 12%

Virginia 12%

Connecticut 12%

Arkansas 11.25%

Delaware 11.25%

Kentucky 10.25%

Pennsylvania 6%

Washington D.C. 6%

As you can see, there is no lending in major population centers of California, Texas, Florida, Illinois, Ohio, Massachusetts and for the most part in Pennsylvania with a 6% rate cap. But there are ways to change that and Loanio can at least get started in 10 states while it fine tunes its business and develops methods for lending in all 50 states. Prosper and Lending Club both originate loans nationally through Webbank before passing them to the individual lenders. This allows nearly full geographic coverage, while usually bypassing state-mandated maximum loan rates.

Loanio joins Prosper, Lending Club, GlobeFunder, Fynanz, GreenNote and Virgin Money in the U.S. P2P lending space (currently, only Prosper, Fynanz, and now Loanio, operate true P2P exchanges). The others are either closed to individual lenders temporarily (Lending Club, GlobeFunder) or require borrowers to find their own funds from friends and family (GreenNote, Virgin Money). For a complete look at the market, see our Online Banking Report on Person-to-Person Lending.

Email: Loanio now open (received 10:39 AM Pacific time 1 Oct 2008)

Note:
1. Unfortunately, this loan is unlikely to be funded due to the max interest rate of 6%, likely because she is a Pennsylvania or Washington DC resident where the rates are capped at 6% (see table).
2. Just about anyone 18 or older can be a lender regardless of where they live. Only South Dakota and Pennsylvania residents are currently ineligible to lend through Loanio.

Share this:

Send Post Twitter LinkedIn Facebook

Web-based Self-Service Debt Collection Makes the News

By Jim Bruene Posted on September 19, 2008
Categories: Loans & Credit, Online Resources (ORCC), Service, Washington Mutual

It’s not often that bank collection techniques make the business press, and when they do, it’s usually not a good story. But last week’s WSJ article by personal finance writer Jane Kim featured a relatively positive spin on how banks are working harder to collect revolving credit debt.

She cited two examples of Web-based self-service applications trying to turn early collection efforts into a non-confrontational, positive experience including:

WaMu’s self-service website, <wamucanhelp.com>
The Virtual Collection Agent powered by Online Resources that is being rolled out by three of the top-10 card issuers. The system was first shown to the public at last year’s Finovate conference (video here)

You can only look at the WaMu collection site if you have a WaMu credit card (screenshot below), but in perusing domain-ownership records, it appears to be hosted by Online Resources, so it likely resembles the screenshot below, a generic mockup from the Online Resources website.

Note the settlement offer listed at the bottom of the page. This offer can be produced dynamically based on input from the user as they use the self-service site.

What’s innovative?
While it won’t work for everyone, collecting past-due debts is one of the trickier areas of bank operations. Financial institutions have to be careful not to be too aggressive early on so they don’t appear heavy-handed and end up driving away an otherwise profitable customer, not to mention that customer’s friends and family.

That’s why a gentle email/text reminder with a link to a self-service support area makes so much sense. Not only can you speed repayments from delinquent borrowers, but also garner valuable goodwill by offering a positive experience via a collaborative online tool. Given the current environment, Web-based collection efforts could maintain precious account relationships.

Virtual collection agent from online resources (19 Sep 2008)

WaMu’s Web-based collection website <wamucanhelp.com> requires a WaMu card number for login (19 Sept 2008)

Share this:

Send Post Twitter LinkedIn Facebook

Person-to-Person (P2P) Lending Update

By Jim Bruene Posted on September 4, 2008
Categories: Lending Club, Loanio, Loans & Credit, Metrics & Market Research, P2P Lending, Prosper, Zopa

Now that we are well past the mid-point of 2008, it’s a good time to look at where we are with one of the most talked-about online financial subjects of the decade: person-to-person or social lending.

Currently, two U.S. companies are actively originating unsecured, multi-purpose P2P loans (note 1):

Prosper: Through July, the leader in the market is running 10% ahead of its 2007 loan-origination pace. The company has funded $55 million and is on pace to do just under $100 million for the year. Website traffic is up 15% compared to a year ago (see graph below) and through July there have been 13% more loan listings (see previous coverage here, Finovate 2007 Best of Show video here; monthly volume reports here).
Zopa: The company, which isn’t technically person-to-person (the loans are originated by six credit union partners) but definitely has a social aspect to its loan program, has not revealed any numbers, but they list 475 loans on the “browse all borrowers page.” Assuming average loan size of $8000 to $9000, they are doing less than $1 million per month. Zopa is using Google AdWords to pitch “instant approval” with a credit score of 640+ (see screenshot below), an aggressive marketing move, especially combined with the 8.49% APR touted on the landing page (see screenshot below; previous coverage here; FinovateStartup 2008 Best of Show video here).

In addition, three more P2P lenders appear very close to launching or relaunching:

Lending Club: The company, launched in May 2007, has been essentially closed to new business since March as they retooled loans into securities for regulatory reasons. However, the company is scheduled to present at our Oct. 14 Finovate conference, implying that they will be out of their quiet period by then (previous coverage here; Finovate 2007 video here).
Loanio: The startup appears to be very close to launching based on an a Sept. 3rd email sent to its house list announcing the launch “in just a few weeks” and adding in parenthesis (yes, we mean it this time!). The company will likely be the first to offer a co-borrower loan application (previous coverage here; Finovate Startup video here).
Pertuity Direct: The newest competitor in the space is Pertuity Direct which we wrote about last week. Its website claims a Sept. 15 launch, and we look forward to seeing their first public demo at Finovate on Oct. 14.

Finally, several companies are looking to launch P2P services in 2008 or 2009, including Globefunder, Community Lend (Canada) and one we just heard about today, Swap-A-Debt.

Forecast revision
Last December we published our second detailed Online Banking Report on Person-to-Person Lending. In that report, we predicted just under $200 million in originations this year. However, due to the inactive period at Lending Club, the delay in Loanio’s launch, and the more conservative approach by Prosper lenders, we are lowering the 2008 forecast by 25%, with an expected total of $135 to $150 million for the year as follows:

Prosper ($95 to $105 million)
Lending Club ($25 to $30 million)
Zopa ($5 to $10 million)
Loanio ($1 to $5 million)
Pertuity Direct ($1 to $5 million)

P2P lending traffic from Compete (July 2007 through July 2008)

Zopa AdWords ad on “loanio” search
(4 Sep 2008, 1 PM PDT from Seattle IP address)

Landing page (4 Sep 2008, link here)

Notes:
1. Specialists are involved in the student loan piece (GreenNote and Fynanz) along with Virgin Money and Loanback which help with person-to-person loan documentation and servicing.

2. Top-right graphic from April 2008 ABC News segment on Lending Club and person-to-person lending.

Share this:

Send Post Twitter LinkedIn Facebook

Pertuity Direct to Launch Person-to-Person (P2P) Lending Service

By Jim Bruene Posted on August 27, 2008
Categories: Launches, Loans & Credit, P2P Lending, Pertuity

“> Link to website Last September, we wrote about the launch of Washington D.C.-based Pertuity Direct. At the time, the startup was showing some interesting social-personal finance tools such as Dare to Compare, which allowed users to compare their financial situation to their peers and national norms (see “before” screenshot below). It looked like another online PFM play.

But it turns out the company’s true business model is person-to-person lending (aka social or P2P lending) where it will compete with Prosper, Lending Club, Loanio, and others (see note 1). Its URL redirects to a non-functional placeholder page (below) that includes only an email signup (note 2).

Here’s the company description of its strategy:

Pertuity Direct is bringing the next generation of social lending to the Web – integrating simplicity, liquidity and automatic diversification into the social lending model.

The founder is Kim Muhota, an ex-banker out of PNC Bank. Pertuity Direct, which is currently closed to the general public, will demo its new product at our October Finovate conference.

Current: Pertuity Direct placeholder page with email signup
(26 Aug 2008)

Before: Pertuity Direct website before redirect put in place
(see note 1, 26 Aug 2008)

Notes:
1. For more on the P2P lending space, see our Online Banking Report on Person-to-Person Lending.

2. You can see the previous website content by following a deeper link available from Google.

Share this:

Send Post Twitter LinkedIn Facebook

Lending Club Adds Secondary Market to Updated S1

By Jim Bruene Posted on August 14, 2008
Categories: Lending Club, Loans & Credit, P2P Lending

Lending Club filed an amended S1 statement, a positive sign that it is moving through the registration process in a timely fashion.

As we noted here after reading the original S1, Lending Club has indeed added a secondary marketing piece to its business plan. Holders of its notes (aka individual lenders), will be able to sell their Lending Club loans through a market run by an undisclosed third party.

Here's the pertinent section from pp. 50-51 of the August 1 S1 (note: the name of the partnering broker-dealer is not disclosed; hence, the blank space below):

Trading System
Lender members may not transfer their Notes except through the resale trading system operated by , a registered broker-dealer. This trading system is an Internet-based trading system on which Lending Club lender members who establish a brokerage relationship with the registered broker-dealer operating the trading system may offer their Notes for sale. In this section, we refer to lender members who have established such brokerage relationships as “subscribers.”

Subscribers may post orders to sell their Notes on the trading system at prices established by the subscriber. Other subscribers will have the opportunity to view these prices, along with historical information from the original loan posting for the member loan corresponding to the Note, an updated credit score range of the borrower member and the payment history for the Note.

I skimmed the updated S1 and didn't see anything else particularly noteworthy. Another blogger, Doughroller.net, noted that the company is adding more credit factors to its loan-pricing model. You can see the new formulas in the S1 filing (pp. 36-38).

Share this:

Send Post Twitter LinkedIn Facebook

FirstAgain Targets Online Users with Excellent Credit

By Jim Bruene Posted on July 8, 2008
Categories: FirstAgain, Loans & Credit, PeopleFirst Finance

I had a great conversation today with the founders of FirstAgain, a startup online lender from the same folks that brought us PeopleFirst Finance ten years ago.

People First invented “blank check” auto lending, earning it one of the first OBR Best of the Web winners (1998 article reprinted here). The company was purchased by Capital One in 2001.

FirstAgain made its first loan in late 2006 and officially launched its unsecured AnythingLoan in July 2007. But the company is just gearing up to start lending in higher volumes after a $30 million venture investment from Arsenal Capital Partners in January. Merrill Lynch provides the warehouse line.

Founders Gary Miller and Dave Zeller outlined their vision of simplifying online lending for customers that pose minimal repayment risk, the FICO 740+ crowd. Having watched them create a new segment in auto lending a decade ago, I expect they will succeed. The company has already originated more than $100 million in unsecured loans.

What’s Innovative?
We’ve added FirstAgain to our watch list and will report back on its innovations in more detail. But here are two small things that demonstrate its creative approach:

1. The little green tree icon on the homepage (see above) highlights the company policy to plant one tree for every loan originated. While that isn’t exactly an earth-shattering benefit, it helps differentiate the company from fly-by-night website operators who’d never think about giving something back to the world.

2. This is the best featurette I’ve seen in a while: “real” online signatures. Users “sign” their loan docs by moving their mouse to draw their signature online. The company also offers a typing option, so users type their name on the keyboard and it’s rendered on-screen with a standard script font.

I imagine FirstAgain is not the first to do this, but I’ve never seen it before. While this new doodad isn’t quite enough to warrant another Best of the Web, it’s still pretty cool, at least if you are an Internet banking geek.

Share this:

Send Post Twitter LinkedIn Facebook

Scooter Loans from "Green" Credit Unions

By Jim Bruene Posted on May 21, 2008
Categories: Green Marketing, Loans & Credit, Public Relations

According to the Wall Street Journal, scooter sales in the U.S. are up 25% compared to last year (article here). While still relatively rare in U.S. cities, I have a feeling that 10 years from now, after a steady diet of $5/gal gas, American cities will look more like their European counterparts, with scooters zipping about everywhere.

For banks or credit unions, this might be the ideal time to jump on the scooter bandwagon by helping customers buy the energy-efficient vehicles. It would be a great way to grab a little PR boost during the slow summer-news cycle, and with some models selling for $4,000 or more, you could boost vehicle loan outstandings by a measurable amount.

A brief Google search located two financial institutions pushing scooter loans, both appropriately with “green” in their name: South Burlington, VT-based Green Mountain Credit Union and a Wisconsin-based credit union (who’s name we removed at their request in Aug. 2010 because the offer is no longer available and they still get inquiries from this post).

Evergreen is promoting a special one-day, 3.99% scooter loan on its homepage (see screenshot below and note 1). The Saturday morning event, conducted in partnership with a local scooter dealer, included test rides, free hot dogs, and prize drawings. The CU also gave away a scooter earlier this month as part of its 50th anniversary special.

Benefits/Opportunities

Incremental loan originations: If you are a good relationship lender, the $4,000 scooter loan today could lead to many $25,000 car loans in the future.
Search-engine marketing: Currently, there are no direct ads running on the keywords “scooter loans,” although you will compete with several advertisers displaying against the generic “loan” in the search term. There are also few organic results for the term, so there’s a good chance an SEO-optimized landing page would rate highly in Google results.
Leverage branch parking: One of the problems with urban scooter use is lack of available parking. Branches with parking could turn over one or more spaces for customers with scooters, creating good will, as well as the occasional picture on the 5 PM news.
Public relations: Anything that saves gas makes for a good story this summer and beyond. It can also be pitched as a “green banking” story, although it’s not a pure environmental win. The gas savings are easy to see, but scooter emissions can be significantly higher than those of the automobiles they replace.
Starter loan/credit: If you can convince your underwriting staff to accept applicants with limited or no credit history, the scooter loan could be a great way for young adults to build a credit file and improve their credit score (thanks, Andrea, for the idea)
Customer acquisition: Scooter loans could be a great way to introduce younger consumers to your financial institution.
Trendy icon: At least for urban customers, the scooter, especially the classic Vespa look, makes for an attractive graphical image, conjuring up memories of trips to Italy, or at least movies shot there on location. Your scooter program could make for good website content, eye-catching outdoor feel (great bus ad!), and or a nice flourish for other media efforts.
Strike a deal with Scooter Financial: The number one result at Google for “scooter loans” is Scooter Financial, which does exactly what you’d expect, make loans to buy scooters. Given their name and Google pagerank, they could be an ideal company to partner with.

Cons and potential problems

It’s an asset easily hidden from the repossession agent, so it’s harder to use the repo-threat to enforce outstanding debt.
The accidental death rate for scooter owners is about 65% higher than that for cars; so you might want to be careful how much you push it as an “automobile alternative.” But the news isn’t all bad: Scooter owners are much less likely to perish than motorcycle owners.
Most gas-powered scooters release significantly more pollutants than most automobiles.
The smaller loan sizes may lead to little, if any, profits.
Not a big market overall.

Green Mountain Credit Union homepage promotes 6.49% scooter loans

(21 May 2008)

Credit Union homepage promotes Saturday “scooter loan” special (21 May 2008)

Share this:

Send Post Twitter LinkedIn Facebook

Prosper Kicks Off Nationwide Lending with New Slogan and TV/Radio Advertising

By Jim Bruene Posted on May 7, 2008
Categories: Loans & Credit, P2P Lending, Prosper

Armed with a new national lending capability (note 1), new slogan, “Let’s bank on each other,” and a window of opportunity to gain ground on the competition (note 2), person-to-person lending pioneer Prosper is preparing new marketing initiatives which include television and radio advertising. Prosper said in its blog Monday that the ads will begin test runs this week.

The two television spots feature short vignettes of real lenders and borrowers (see screenshot below). Prosper has also posted brief “behind-the-scenes” videos of the borrower and lender meeting while giving gushing testimonials about the service.

There is also a series of seven 30-second radio spots:

Meet the lender/borrower spots featuring same pairs as the TV ads (2 ads)
A young student borrowing from Prosper
A small business person borrowing from Prosper
A youngish woman borrowing from Prosper for debt consolidation
A man borrowing from Prosper for home improvement
A man borrowing from Prosper for a car loan

Preview the ads here (note 3).

Analysis
It will be interesting to see how the advertising is received. From a branding perspective, I think the ads are extremely effective, doing a good job communicating the benefits to both borrowers and lenders. And Prosper positions itself as a smart bank alternative without getting overly negative (e.g., Lending Tree’s $100-million “When banks compete” campaign in the late 1990s) or going so over the top (think WaMu) that you can’t recall who made the ad (see previous coverage here).

One thing I’m sure of: Prosper did a great job showcasing the ads on their website, including the very Web 2.0 touch of posting “behind-the-scenes” videos of the TV commercials.

Notes:

1. Prosper recently changed its process so all loans are originated by Utah industrial bank, WebBank, then resold to the winning Prosper bidders. The TV ad above even carries the fine print that, “Prosper lenders are loan purchasers.”

2. Prosper’s primary competitor, LendingClub, is currently operating at limited capacity as it seeks additional licensing/authority from regulatory bodies (coverage here). It, too, uses WebBank to originate all loans made through its platform. The latest entrant, Loanio, debuted its services at our April 29 Finovate Startup conference, but is still a few weeks away from a launch. A number of other P2P startups are in various stages of development with launches expected within the next 12 to 18 months.

3. For more information on the P2P lending market, see our Online Banking Report: Person-to-person Lending 2.0

Share this:

Send Post Twitter LinkedIn Facebook

State	Max Interest Rate
Alabama	30%
Georgia	30%
Mississippi	30%
New Mexico	30%
North Carolina	30%
Indiana	21%
West Virginia	18%
Wisconsin	18%
Alaska	16%
Nebraska	16%
New Jersey	16%
New York	16%

State	Max Interest Rate
Tennessee	12.25%
Hawaii	12%
Louisiana	12%
South Carolina	12%
Virginia	12%
Connecticut	12%
Arkansas	11.25%
Delaware	11.25%
Kentucky	10.25%
Pennsylvania	6%
Washington D.C.	6%