Citibank Teams with mFoundry for True Mobile Banking

Link to mFoundry I spoke with mFoundry CEO/Founder Drew Sievers last week. If you want to get energized over the possibilities of mobile commerce, this is the guy to talk to.

Although mFoundry already has more than 100,000 users of its mobile application, we were most interested in its recently announced deal with Citibank. The bank is set to launch a full mobile banking application in Q1 2007 that encompasses both SMS-based banking and what we call True Mobile Banking (TMB), a banking application running on the mobile device (see definitions here).

While mFoundry's CEO cannot confirm which functions Citibank will use, the vendor's mBanking platform includes the following: 

  • account inquiry
  • transaction summary
  • funds transfer
  • bill payment
  • ATM/branch locator
  • password generator

The platform also supports advertising and service functions (download spec sheet here).

How it Works
The mFoundry approach uses both text messaging for alerts and simple inquires and a complete downloaded application that mimics Web-based online banking (i.e., True Mobile Banking). With True Mobile Banking, the user's phone carries a unique identifier that is registered with the bank (factor one); and before receiving data or initiating a transaction the user must log in with a password or PIN (factor two).

When the user logs in, current balance and recent transactions are automatically downloaded and displayed, satisfying most user needs within seconds. The application times-out after a certain length of time and more importantly, no data is retained on the device itself, so security is nearly perfect. If the phone is lost or stolen a call to the bank will deactivate the service, although as long as the password or PIN has not been revealed, there is little security risk. 

Analysis
As mentioned in our post three weeks ago (here), it's taken nearly a decade for me to jump on the mobile banking bandwagon. Earlier efforts were too hard to use and had limited appeal, primarily to a small group of PDA-toting geeks.

However, now that even basic mobile phones can use the service (see note 1) and top brands such as Citibank, Cingular, and MasterCard are poised to pump millions into educating the market, mobile finance should take off rapidly (see note 2). 

End Notes
:

  1. mFoundry says its service works across more than 200 different phones at the five major carriers, AT&T, Cingular, Sprint, T-Mobile, and Verizon. Sure enough, even our relatively inexpensive 2-year-old Sanyo is on their list of supported phones.
  2. In order to download the mobile application, users select their carrier and phone type from sliding menus (see screenshot below, from mFoundry's My Mobile News).

Downloading the mobile application at mFoundry

2. The next issue of our Online Banking Report will contain a mobile banking forecast.

Best Internet Banks from Global Finance Magazine

Globalfinance_logoIn its seventh annual Internet-bank "beauty contest," Global Finance Magazine <gfmag.com> named Bank of America the best consumer Internet bank in the United States and Citigroup the best corporate Internet bank. Apparently, the magazine loves Citigroup's work, naming it the best corporate Internet bank in 46 countries and best consumer Internet bank in 11 countries including Germany, United Kingdom, and Indonesia (see list of complete winners, by country, by clicking on the link at the bottom of this article). 

The magazine also named winners in specific categories. In the United States, the winners were:

Consumer Internet Banks:

Best investment management services: Bank of America

Best bill payment and presentment: Bank of America

Best online consumer credit: Wells Fargo

Best website design: Wells Fargo

Best integrated consumer bank site: Bank of America

Best information security initiatives: Bank of America

Best online deposits acquisition: TD Bank Financial Group

Corporate/Institutional Internet Banks:

Best online cash management: Citigroup

Best trade finance services: Citigroup

Best website design: Wells Fargo

Best integrated corporate bank site: Wells Fargo

Best information security initiatives: JPMorgan Chase

Global Finance Magazine's Best Internet Banks for 2006

Country

Consumer

Corporate/Institutional

Argentina

Banco Rio de la Plata, S.A.

Citigroup

Australia

HSBC

Citigroup

Austria

RZB

RZB

Bahrain

Citigroup

Belgium

Citigroup

Bolivia

Citigroup

Brazil

Banco Bradesco

Banco Bradesco

Brunei

HSBC

Cameroon

Citigroup

Canada

TD Bank Financial Group

TD Bank Financial Group

Chile

Citigroup

BBVA

China

Ind. & Com’l Bank of China

Citigroup

Colombia

Citigroup

BBVA

Congo

Citigroup

Costa Rica

Citigroup

Cote D'Ivoire

Citigroup

Dominican Republic

Citigroup

Dubai

National Bank of Dubai

National Bank of Dubai

Ecuador

Citigroup

Egypt

Citigroup

Citigroup

El Salvador

Citigroup

Finland

Citigroup

France

Citigroup

Gabon

Citigroup

Germany

Citigroup

JPMorgan Chase

Greece

Citigroup

Piraeus Bank/Winbank

Guatemala

Citigroup

Haiti

Citigroup

Honduras

Citigroup

Hong Kong

HSBC

Citigroup

India

ICICI Bank Ltd.

ICICI Bank Ltd

Indonesia

Citigroup

Citigroup

Ireland

Citigroup

Israel

Citigroup

Italy

Citigroup

Jamaica

Citigroup

Kenya

Citigroup

Korea

Citigroup

Kyrgyzstan

AsiaUniversalBank (AUB)

AsiaUniversalBank (AUB)

Malaysia

HSBC

OCBC

Mexico

Banamex

Banamex

Netherlands

Citigroup

Nigeria

Citigroup

Oman

BankMuscat

Pakistan

Citigroup

Citigroup

Panama

Citigroup

Paraguay

Citigroup

Peru

BBVA

Citigroup

Philippines

Citigroup

Bank of the Philippines

Poland

Bank Millennium

Citigroup

Portugal

Millennium BCP

Millennium BCP

Puerto Rico

Banco Santander

Citigroup

Qatar

Qatar National Bank

Qatar National Bank

Russia

ZAO Raiffeisenbank

Citigroup

Saudi Arabia

Samba

Samba

Senegal

Citigroup

Singapore

Citigroup

Spain

BBVA

Citigroup

South Africa

Citigroup

Sri Lanka

HSBC

Switzerland

Citigroup

Taiwan

Citigroup

Chinatrust Com’l Bank

Tanzania

Citigroup

Thailand

Citigroup

Citigroup

Trinidad & Tobago

Citigroup

Turkey

Garanti Bank

Akbank

Uganda

Citigroup

United Arab Emirates

HSBC

HSBC

United Kingdom

Citigroup

HSBC

United States

Bank of America

Citigroup

Uruguay

Citigroup

Venezuela

Banco de Venezuela

BBVA Banco Provincial

Zambia

Citigroup

Source: Global Finance Magazine <gfmag.com>, July 8, 2006

Citibank Leaves Card Applicants Vulnerable to Identity Theft

We were impressed with Citibank’s full-page ad in Sunday’s New York Times travel section offering 25,000 miles to take a new American Airlines co-branded credit card. As usual, we looked for a link to the Web-based application and were pleased to find a large, reverse-type URL along the bottom of the ad. Unfortunately, Citi did not follow the usual convention for printed landing-page URLs, creating potential problems for applicants.

Typically, offline advertisements use a special filename after the normal domain name, such as <www.yourbank.com/special>. This allows users to go directly to the landing page explaining the special offer (see landing page below).

Citi_aadvantage_25landingpage_1

Instead, Citibank used the unique server name "miles5" as in: <www.miles5.citicards.com>. There are several problems with this approach. First, it’s long and not easily recalled. But the biggest problem is its non-standard format. Internet users do not expect to see an extra period in the middle of a bank's URL. So many users, myself included, may read this as a unique domain name, <miles5citicards.com>.

Normally, that would be okay. But in this case Citibank neglected to register that domain name. An identity thief could easily have registered that domain, and then taken “applications” for days or weeks before anyone caught on, possibly leaving hundreds of applicants vulnerable to identity theft after entering their personal info, including social security number, in the application.

By mid-day on Monday, almost two days after the ad first appeared in print, the domain was still unregistered. We went ahead and registered it to prove the point, and keep it safe.

Implications
The moral of this story: If you live in a glass house, make sure any transparencies are covered. Register your domain name. Citibank, which has spent millions on its anti-identity theft campaign, left itself and its customers vulnerable for the price of an $8.95 domain name. Make sure you register the domain name of any cute URLs you put out there for marketing campaigns. While you are at it, spend $60 and lock it up for 10 years. 

Memo to Citibank’s legal team: We have no commerical interest in the domain and will happily transfer it to your ownership. All we ask is reimbursement of our 9 bucks.

JB

Getting Even with the Citibank Call Center

Citibank_paypassScore:
     Tom Brown — 1
     Citibank — 0

How many times have you been frustrated by your experience at a call center? Well, if you were a multi-millionaire hedge fund manager with his own blog, you could get back at the company, and then some.

Read today's extremely thorough account (transcribed verbatim from a tape recording) of Second Curve's Tom Brown as he attempts to add a PayPass contactless debit card to his Citibank account <bankstocks.com>.

A couple lessons here:

1. Flag Tom Brown, and other influential VIPs, in your customer database so they get topnotch phone service
2. Be careful with geographic-based product rollouts to avoid irritating customers
3. Simplify call center scripts

JB

Google Checkout: “iPodding” Ecommerce? Citibank’s Unusual Role

Ipod_nanoHas Google found its iPod? Not the music player, but an end-to-end ecommerce system that is safe, convenient, and above all, drop-dead simple to use. Something that does for online commerce what Apple did for digital music. That's a tall order, but we believe the search giant may have just such a hit on its hands with Google Checkout.

Google_checkout_logo_1For more than a year, there has been a great deal of speculation about Google’s entry into the payments arena. After months of quiet testing with carefully selected beta merchant partners such as Starbucks and Buy.com, Google Checkout was officially released June 29 <checkout.google.com>. Although the reaction in online blogs was mixed, we think it's a winner. The only question is whether it's a home run or a grand slam (or World Cup equivalents, one goal or four).

Google Checkout (previously known as Google Payments or Gbuy) is an online-payments tool integrated with the user's Google account. On the surface, it's similar to PayPal, but the true strength and potential threat is its close ties to Google’s already industry-dominant search function.

At this point, Checkout's functionality is more limited than PayPal's. There is no stored value, no subscription payments, no eBay integration, no non-credit card options, no integrated debit card, or money market account. For the end-user, it's closer to a virtual wallet than a PayPal substitute. However, it goes way beyond what the ewallets of the late 1990s offered, taking control of the entire checkout process, a potentially disruptive technology in online retailing.

Google_checkout_starbucks_search

How it works
Google_checkout_starbucks Searches that match a Google Checkout advertiser include a shopping cart icon embedded within the AdWords text box (see Google search on "Starbucks store" above). Users can buy products from these merchants in a few clicks without having to enter any additional information (see Google Checkout icon in lower left of the Starbucks shopping cart shown at right). This eliminates the dreaded merchant-account set-up process that causes massive shopping card abandonment problems, especially at relatively unknown merchants where privacy fears are greater.

Google_checkout_starbucks2First-time users are prompted to enter their credit card, billing, and shipping information, which Google stores in its servers (see screenshot left). Subsequent purchases can be made with a simple Google username and password. Users can store additional payment and/or shipping options at any time. Complete purchase histories can then be monitored from their Google account.

Currently, just 100 merchants are participating (see places to buy), but given the potential merchant savings, expect that to change quickly. Twenty-four of the 100 Checkout users offer a $10 discount on purchases of $20 or more (see DayDeals screenshot below).

Google_checkout_daydeal2Like PayPal, Google shields the buyer’s credit card number and other personal information beyond what is necessary for shipping purposes. However, Google also provides the option of keeping the user's email address confidential, a spam-limiting function not available via PayPal.

When a user selects the confidential option (see screenshot below), Google forwards the seller's confirmation message to the end-user.

Google_checkout_finalstep_2 

Sellers are paid directly through their own Google Checkout account. Google has significantly undercut PayPal on pricing, at least for smaller merchants. Google's fee is 2% of the sales amount plus a flat $0.20 transaction fee compared to PayPal’s typical 2.9% plus $0.30 (PayPal has a sliding scale with higher-volume, $100k/mo and above, merchants paying 1.9% plus $0.30).

In addition, Google advertisers earn credits against their processing fees. For every dollar spent on Adwords, sellers can process $10 worth of sales with no processing charges other than the $0.20 transaction fee. It amounts to a 20% discount on AdWords spending, provided there is sufficient Google Checkout volume (i.e., at least 10 times the amount spent in AdWords).

Finally, sellers can create their own Buy Now buttons at the Google site, then drag and drop the HTML code into their websites. This allows small business sellers who are not currently ecommerce-enabled to immediately begin accepting Google Checkout.

Google is expected to provide additional data as the service matures. Having a hand in the process from product search all the way through to the purchase will allow Google to keep tabs on which ads actually result in a sale. This could mean changes to Adwords pricing or structure.

Analysis
The pitch to consumers is appealing. In addition to the privacy shields, Google promises to mediate disputes, and gives users a central place to track purchases. But the biggest consumer benefit: a common user interface for checkout, something that previous ewallets never provided. As you can see in the screenshot below, after shopping the merchant site, the contents of the cart are transferred to Google. At that point, Google takes over, offering the end-user the following options:

  • Change shipping method with all costs itemized
  • Add a coupon code
  • Change credit card
  • Change shipping address
  • Shield email address from merchant
  • SIgn up for promotional messages from merchant
  • Links to the user's Google account
  • Concise summary of the billing info, including exactly how the charge will appear on the user's credit card statement
  • Concise summary of the merchant's return policy

Google_checkout_dvdempire

Will consumers give up more personal information to the largest data repository on earth? Initial polls seem to suggest so. In addition, you can bet that merchants will create incentives to move credit card and/or PayPal volume to Google to save as much as 3% on card processing. For a retailer with a 10% margin, that's a potential 30% lift.

You might be thinking that free credit card processing is a short-term loss leader that will end as soon as a critical mass of merchants adopts Google's system. We don't think so. Put yourself in the shoes of a Google advertiser. You now know that you'll earn a 20% discount on your AGoogle_checkout_signindWords buy. Will you let that drop to the bottom line, or might you use some of that windfall to goose your bids on Google a bit? If it's an efficient market, eventually much, if not all, of the "free" card processing will flow back to Google in the form of higher bids. And since not all merchants will qualify for the 20% discount, Google might actually increase its total take due to the "discount." Brilliant.   

Google_checkout_ccregCitibank's role
The program should have little impact on retail banks, since at this point Google Checkout must use a bank-issued credit or signature debit card to participate. However, Citibank is paying Google to be the "preferred card" on both the Google sign-in page (click on inset above for closeup) and the credit card registration page (click on inset right). The credit card giant is hoping the $5 (or 1000 Thank-you points), will entice users to enter their Citi card into the Google wallet. The $5 bonus offer ends Aug. 1.

Retail banks might want to consider supporting the payment service with a secure gateway to various online payment alternatives so users can manage their PayPal, Google, and other accounts directly from a secure online banking area.

If you are a credit card processor, however, this could eventually pose a threat to your market share and/or margins. Even without factoring in the AdWord's credit, Google's highly publicized 2% discount rate, along with a lack of monthly fees, is a bargain, especially for small businesses. However, given the reluctance of businesses to change banking relationships, it will be years before the impact is felt.

JB

Citibank cracks the “Wired 40”

Wired_cover_190_1We are huge fans of Wired magazine <wired.com>, having read just about every one of its 190 monthly issues. In fact, eight or nine years ago I used to tell friends that the goal of Online Banking Report was to translate the technology magazine into "banking terms."   

I still recommend the magazine to anyone interested in the future of digital communications, marketing, or content (that ought to cover anyone reading this). So if you're not already on board, head to its website and plunk down US$10 for an annual subscription.

Wired 40
Wired_40_logo_1Every year Wired publishes its list of its top 40 companies, The Wired 40. Most are large companies selected for their strategic vision, global reach, killer technology, and hunger for new ideas. The latest ranking (July issue) has Google at #1, knocking Apple from the top. The biggest surprise, New Corp. hitting the chart at #9. The company, which wasn't even ranked last year, has become an Internet giant with its purchase of MySpace last year (see NB March 16).

Here's the top 10 with last year's rank in parenthesis:

  1. Google (#2)
  2. Apple (#1)
  3. Samsung (#3)
  4. Genentech (#7)
  5. Yahoo (#5)
  6. Amazon.com (#6)
  7. Toyota (#8)
  8. General Electric (#17)
  9. News Corp. (NEW)
  10. SAP (#11)

Ge_wired_onlineAs you would expect, there's not much in the way of financial services in the list. However, Citibank holds on to the number 38, down two spots from last year. Not entirely coincidental, Citi is one of the few major financial services advertisers in Wired. This month, the bank has a huge buy, with a fold-out front-cover spread pitching its "Citi identity theft solutions."

GE (#8), Yahoo (#5), Microsoft (#36), and even Google (#1) have significant retail financial services, although they account for mere slivers of the giants' overall revenues.

Like Citibank, GE elected to make an ad buy this month, pitching its high-yield deposit products on the online version of the Wired 40 list (see inset).

Falling out of the top 40 this year was TD Ameritrade which the magazine said still "ruled etrading, but what once was a disruptive technology is now a commodity."

Online Banking’s “Second Wave”

In today's Wall Street Journal, personal finance writer Jane Kim does a roundup of what she calls "the next wave of online banking." The impetus for the article was Yodlee's new MoneyCenter that will be available to consumers in early July. I was interviewed for the article and provided several of the examples along with the market size estimate.

In addition to Yodlee, the following developments were chronicled in the article:

  • Citibank's <citibank.com> 50-fold increase in online interbank transfer limits from around $2,000 to $100,000 this summer. In what may simply be a self-serving comment made to a reporter, the bank cites the demand for its new e-Savings account as an impetus for the change.
  • Commerce Bank's (NJ) Virtual Private Bank <virtualprivatebank.com> for customers with $1 million or more in investable assets.
  • Wells Fargo's My Spending Report, a simple integrated spending report we discussed last year. (NB Feb. 17, 2005)
  • Bank of America's <bankamerica.com> account aggregation and recently expanded account alerts.
  • Chase's <chase.com> next-day bill payment.

Analysis
Although most of these examples are relatively minor improvements, it's good to see the mainstream press recognizing online banking innovations. The last few years have been dominated by security concerns, and we believe it's a great sign that reporters are looking for "what's next." It would be wise to have an answer to that question when your local paper calls.

We believe the Virtual Private Bank (VPB) from Commerce and the Yodlee system deserve closer examination. We'll cover Yodlee's new product when it goes live next month. And, although we won't be able to drop a million into Commerce Bank, we'll take the VPB for a test drive later this week.

JB

If you’d like to learn more about the future of online banking, check out the Online Banking & Bill Pay Forecast: Current, future and historical usage: 1994 to 2016 from our sister publication, The Online Banking Report.

Five Percent Savings Rate from Citibank

In yet another aggressive deposit-pricing move, Citibank raised its e-Savings rate to 5%, the first major high-yield player to surpass the magic 5% mark on a savings account with a low minimum balance. IndyMac (5%, $25k min) and Countrywide (5.25%, $50k min) hit 5% before Citi, but have higher minimums.

Keep in mind, Citi's account requires a checking account, a significant part of the strategy that has attracted more than $2 billion in new money in the past three months (NB June 1).

Citi_5percent_home_1

Citibank’s e-Savings email

Last night, Citibank sent selected checking-account customers an email solicitation for its 4.75% APR e-Savings account. I live outside its branch network, so Citi may have elected not to send the message to customers serviced by traditional branches.

Citibank_email_esavings_with_imageThe message was direct and to the point (click on screenshot left). Citibank even included the impressive 4.75% interest rate in the message subject. The only distracting portion of the message was a garbled first word in the second paragraph. It was probably caused by incompatibilities in software rendering of the apostrophe in the first word, "there's." To avoid this type of error, make sure you proof your message in multiple email clients.

The bank continues to engender trust in its marketing messages by including the "email security" box in the upper-right corner which includes the customer's full name and last four digits of their ATM card. The security information is prominently displayed, in a blue shaded box to make it more prominent, even if the user has images blocked (see screenshot below).

The bank also includes short text messages that appear where the images would have been displayed (alt-text tags) making the message relatively readable even for users that never download the images.

Citibank_email_esavings_no_image

Surprisingly, the landing page for the offer was a generic product page. The campaign would be much more effective if the bank had reinforced the e-Savings benefits on the landing page like it does when it advertises online (see NB March 29). Click on the following link to see a screenshot of the landing page. —JB

Appendix

Landing page
(displayed when clicking on the "signup" button in the email).

Note: I tested the link on my laptop where I am not recognized as a customer and on my desktop that saves my username in a cookie. Both times I was served the same landing page (below).

Citibank_email_esavings_landing

Citi Direct Bringing in $1 Billion Per Month in New Money

Bernstein_conf_logo
According to remarks made by Citibank CEO Charles Prince at the Sanford Bernstein investor conference, the bank's new high-yield savings account, currently yielding 4.75% (see NetBanker May 19), is bringing in $1 billion per month in new money. He characterized the deposit total as, "the equivalent of having opened 23 new branches."

His exact quote, available via webcast (comments start at the 47:45 mark of the webcast) was, "In the first ten days after the launch, we had ten times the volume we predicted. Today, literally only a few weeks after the launch, we've raised 3 billion dollars in deposits." He also said that two-thirds of that was "new money to the institution."

These numbers are in line with the industry forecast outlined by Citibank.com director Catherine Palmieri a month ago (see NetBanker May 5) of $250 billion in 2006. If that forecast holds true, $20 billion per month into high-yield savings, Citibank is bagging 7% to 8% of the market. 

JB

Citi Focuses on its High-Yield Savings Account

Citi_esavings_msn_1On Tuesday (5/16), Citibank raised its e-Savings rate 25 basis points to 4.75%, making it the highest savings rate at a name-brand financial institution. Only Corus Bank in Chicago has a higher APY on BankRate.com today, 4.84% with a $10,000 minimum.

Bankrate_savingspageMore importantly, Citi continues its massive ad buy touting the rate. It was back on the top of MSN's homepage today, and the bank has bought huge parcels of BankRate.com, with some pages running three Citibank promos, top, bottom and side (see BankRate "Checking & Savings" page right). It's similar to what Emigrant Direct did last year to kick off its direct banking efforts (click here to see past NetBanker articles on deposit marketing).

Analysis
Emigrant Direct, HSBC, ING Direct, and now Citibank are all spending $10+ million per year promoting high rates (see ad spending NetBanker5/17). While high-rate offers are nothing new, the ease of finding rate deals online and transferring the funds means it will be harder to hold onto those high-balance 0.50% checking and savings account balances.

JB

Hiding Your Offer from Existing Customers

Usually, when designing targeted offers, you focus on what you know about the prospect. Where do they live? What products do they use? What's their balance? What if you wanted to offer a product only to folks you know nothing about, such as new visitors to your website?

Suppose you had a hot APY offer you wanted to make only to new customers to avoid cannibalizing that cash cow, the passbook savings account. Using cookies, you could avoid showing the offer to online banking users, minimizing their awareness of the product.

Citi_esavings_homepageApparently, Citibank is using this approach. In a routine visit to Citibank's website in mid-April using our laptop, we were surprised to see advertisements for its 4.50% e-Savings account dominating the website (click on inset for a closeup). When the high-yield product was announced (NetBanker March 29), many observers believed it was a stealth offer made through a new "Citibank Direct" entity.

But when we returned to the office, the offer had disappeared from the homepage. We had to click on the small "special offers" link to find it listed along with several other offers. Apparently, the cookies on our office PC, which identify us as a Citibank online banking user, triggered the website to load a different homepage. We confirmed this through testing on other PCs.

But before you use this tactic, realize it has significant drawbacks. First, it doesn't work with users who delete or disable cookies, estimated to be as high as 40%. Also, an online banking user visiting from a different location, or with a different browser, will also see your offer.

There is also the risk of your clever marketing being outed to the press and public, which may find the practice deceptive (see SmartMoney, April 2006). Finally, you may be teaching users to game your system, deleting cookies more often, entering different zip codes, and so on. This could hinder your ability to deliver targeted promotions to the customers you DO know something about.

JB

Citi_google_citibankNote: Citibank isn't shy about putting the offer on Google, where it shows as the top paid result on searches for  "Citibank" (see screenshot right).