Value-added Online Financial Services: $4.95 per Month is the New Free

imageAs we’ve mentioned before, there are surprisingly few fee-based online financial services in the United States (see note 1). But things may be changing. In the past month we’ve looked at three innovative services charging fees:  

Today, we highlight a fourth new fee-based service, also charging $4.95/month (or more), vSafe from Wells Fargo. vSafe is a secure online storage solution that sells for $15 to $15 per months as follows:

  • $4.95/mo for 1GB of storage
  • $9.95/mo for 3GB of storage
  • $14.95/mo for 6GB of storage

The service was introduced several months ago, and I’ve been using it for a couple months. The service automatically stores Wells Fargo statements, and allows users to upload any other file up to the storage limit. It would be even more useful if it offered automated retrieval and storage of other bank and biller statements.

Wells Fargo homepage (1 June 2009, 1:15 PM PDT)

image

Landing page (link, 1 June 2009)

image

Take a test drive in the Wells Fargo lab (link, 1 June 2009)

image

Interactive video highlighting benefits

image

Signup explanation

image

Notes:
1. The golden rule of consumerism: “You get what you pay for.” Because online banking services are typically offered free of charge, U.S. consumers have had to contend with clunkier, slower, less secure and less feature-rich online services than consumers in other countries that pay for online access. Fees for online services can be a win-win, allowing financial institutions to offer premium online services for those willing and able to pay for them, while at the same time offering basic services free of charge so that everyone can benefit from online banking. 
2. Article updated 9 July 2009 to remove incorrect reference to Expensify’s $4.95/mo fee (see comments).

LowerMyAssessment.com offers timely personal finance tool to save on property taxes

image Usually, it’s the big ideas that get all the press. Last week alone, Microsoft launched a new search engine (Bing), Google announced a new way to communicate (Google Wave), and Facebook began rolling out an alt-payment service to its 200 million users. 

Those have intriguing long-term ramifications, but can they save you money today? 

Here’s something a little more pragmatic: A tool that promises to make it easy to challenge your tax assessment, potentially saving hundreds or thousands of dollars annually. Enter LowerMyAssessment.com (LMA).

I saw a few screenshots of the service during the company’s application to debut at FinovateStartup 2009 last month (demo video here). But I couldn’t use the service until a few weeks ago.

How it works
image Consumers visiting LMA can use the website’s free tool to check their home’s value against current market estimates. LMA taps public databases to determine tax-assessed values and calculates market value from various third-party sources such as Zillow.

The company then makes the simple math calculation and informs users if the value of their home is under the tax-assessed value. If it is, LMA provides forms and instructions to challenge tax assessments with the local assessor’s office.

In our test case, using an address in Seattle, one of 10 states currently served by LMA, we were told that its assessed value was $300,000 more than the market value (note 2). LMA encouraged me to register and let them help me challenge that assessment.

Registered users complete an online form with info needed to challenge their assessment (see screenshot 3 below). After completing that form, users must pay $125 to complete the challenge process and receive their FairValue Report (shown above).  

Analysis
While the cost-saving potential is significant, the challenge for LMA is getting consumers to shell out $125 for something they can conceivably do themselves (note 3). It took us just a few minutes using Google to uncover the challenge forms and procedures at the King County website. And market value estimates can be pulled from Zillow and its competitors.   

To reduce sticker shock, the company recently removed the big $125 price tag from its homepage (see screenshot 1) and is now emphasizing the free lookup feature (screenshot 2). I can understand downplaying a three-figure fee, especially online. But now they’ve gone too far the other way. I cannot find the price of the service anywhere on the website. It wasn’t disclosed until I completed my registration and filled out the challenge form (see screenshot 4 below).

There’s also the small matter of getting the word out. The major market opportunity will largely be gone once home prices get back to their pre-recession levels, even though there will always be cases where consumers feel their assessment is unfair. But LMA needs to team with major financial or real estate firms as soon as possible to reach large groups of potential customers. 

Bank and credit union opportunities
As discussed in previous posts, direct fee income is scarce in online banking, at least in the United States. Aside from credit bureau monitoring, there are few up-front fees that consumers are willing to pay. Certainly, banks earn billions from the underlying checking, debit, and credit card accounts, but nothing from the value added online.

It’s possible the service could be replicated by a bank or mortgage provider using available APIs from Zillow or others. But for most banks, it would be far simpler to outsource the service to LMA or other specialists.

If the service were sold for $100+, with revenue shared 50/50, a bank or credit union could earn a respectable profit while providing a unique and free service to customers; however, the folks at City Hall may not be so appreciative. If city government is a big customer, you might tread carefully here.

1. New LowerMyAssessment homepage emphasizes free (2 June 2009)

image

2. Previous homepage disclosed the substantial fee up-front (12 May 2009)

image

3. Online appeal form for King County Washington (2 June 2009)

clip_image002[8]

4. $125 (+tax) fee is not disclosed until checkout (2 June 2009)

image

Notes:
1. States currently covered: Arizona, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, New Jersey, Ohio, Oregon, Washington
2. That was on May 11. Now, three weeks later, LMA shows the house having declined another 20%. Home prices are certainly fluctuating, but n
ot that much. It appears that LMA has switched to using Zillow’s low estimate instead of the mid-range one. That may help sell more services, but it’s a bit misleading. It would be much better to show the range of potential market values pulling data from all three third-party valuation sites, in much the way RedFin does. 
3. They also have some work to do in clarifying the buying process. It’s not really clear exactly what you are buying at checkout. Are you submitting a property-tax challenge at that point? What about the FairValue Report? When do you see that? But we’ll cut them slack on that since they just launched a few weeks ago.

Has Mercantile Bank cracked the code for generating online banking fees?

imageWe are always on the lookout for examples of U.S. financial institutions charging fees for value-added services online (see note 1). In the past seven or eight years, the sightings have been rare. 

But today, we have a great one. And like most brilliant ideas, it seems pretty obvious in retrospect. The new service from Mercantile Bank of Michigan is called Funds Manager (PDF FAQs here) and it’s not only a great service innovation, but also promises to bring fees back to online banking.

How it works
Funds Manager is basically a consumer version of positive pay, a standard offering in commercial banking. In the commercial version, clients look at checks and electronic items being presented for payment, and can nix any that are fraudulent.

Mercantile launched similar capabilities for its retail customers, allowing them to peek at their pending checks and ACH items a half-day before they are withdrawn from their account (see note 1).

Between 11 AM and noon, the bank posts the checks that will be processed that evening, giving customers a few hours lead time to make a transfer to avoid an upcoming overdraft. Customers have until 5 PM to make a branch deposit or 7 PM to make an online transfer to cover a shortfall.

Mercantile’s online and mobile banking are powered by S1.

Business case
Sure, the service would impact OD/NSF income. But the bank makes up for that by charging a small fee, $4/mo, for the service. Given the type of customer who’d be drawn to this service, $48/yr should more than cover any lost OD income. And it provides a service that improves customer satisfaction and differentiates the bank from others. Business customers pay $30/mo, a potentially lucrative small-business service.

According to an article in Friday’s American Banker, the bank has signed up a quarter of its retail online banking customers for the service (558 of 2,361). While the $27,000 in annual revenues to Mercantile barely covers costs, if Bank of America experienced similar penetration, it would be worth more than $250 million per year, a nice boost to the online banking P&L.

Opportunities
Not only is consumer positive pay a nice standalone service, it could be the cornerstone of a premium online banking option that could be priced at $5/mo or more. 

It would be even better if users received email or text-message alerts whenever they had items to review. And it would be a great addition to an iPhone/mobile app where the items could be reviewed, and transfers initiated, right on the phone.

Notes:
1. Please email other examples to me or add them to the comments.
2. The advanced look does not include branch deposits, ATM transactions, wire transfers, or telephone transfers.  

Where Are the Online Banking Fees?

imageI am rarely at a loss for material when looking for examples to illustrate a point about online finance. Across thousands of financial websites, there’s an almost infinite supply of novel new services, marketing strategies, and promotional efforts. 

However, there’s one area with almost zero innovation. Pricing.

In the United States anyway, nearly every bank and credit union offers online, and now mobile, banking free of charge (see note 1). It’s an appealing price point for sure, but it also hampers the ability of financial institutions to develop novel service offerings. It’s a game of minimizing channel costs rather than maximizing returns.

However, several interesting new services that are at least trying to charge fees have recently shot up in online personal finance. Two debuted their new services at FinovateStartup April 28 (see notes 2 & 3; videos of their demos will be available online shortly):

  • LowerMyAssessment.com is charging $125 to help consumers lower property taxes on their homes
  • Home-Account is charging a $8.75/mo to help users manage their home mortgage

We’ll look at both companies this week starting with LowerMyAssessment.com.  

Notes:
1. We covered online banking pricing in a 2004 Online Banking Report (here). While the report is nearly five years old, sadly little has changed, so it remains relevant to today’s situation in the United States. 
2. In addition, at FinovateStartup we saw several new services that could increase payments-related income for banks, including the alt-payment companies, especially Acculynk and Moneta, offering revenue sharing and interchange fees for banking partners, and MicroNotes, which showed a platform that provided fee income to delivery-targeted advertising within the bill-payment function.
3. Also, Wells Fargo should be given credit for rolling out a fee-based storage solution integrated within its online banking services. The vSafe program costs $4.95/mo and up based on storage capacity desired. 

Banks Scarier than Criminals. Really?

You know you are losing the PR battle when headlines like this begin to appear:

The point of Tuesday's column from MSNBC's Bob Sullivan, is that consumers fear overdraft fees more than fraud. Hmmm….would that have anything to do with the fact that customers PAY for overdraft fees while the bank picks up the tab for most fraud?

But even overlooking that minor piece of common sense, how does annoyance at overdraft fees equate to being "scarier than criminals?" The headline does a disservice to Sullivan's well-researched and thoughtful column.  

What Banks Should Do
While the headlines will hopefully be a bit more objective, expect more of the same in the coming year. Overdraft fees are becoming a big story. And as the 2008 election cycle kicks in to full gear, expect more grandstanding from politicians on both sides of the aisle. No one wants to be on record as being "for" overdraft fees, or any bank fee for that matter.

Banks need to do two things to head off a PR disaster and avoid pricing caps and/or more regulation from Congress:

1. Look hard at overdraft fee policies including both size and timing of the charges. And if you do find a way to cap/lower or lower overdraft fees, wrap that news in a big bow and deliver it to your customers for the holidays. And if you have a lower fee than the big banks in your market, by all means, let your customers know.  

2. Proactively sell overdraft protection options and balance-awareness services such as online/mobile banking and low-balance alerts via email and text message.

And one more thing:

In press interviews and marketing messages, eliminate all references to "courtesy" and "a service for our customers" in describing overdraft fees. Stay on the message that the onus is on the customer to track their balances. Here's a great response, ABA congressional testimony quoted in the MSNBC article:

The bottom line is that customers are in the best position to know what their actual balance is — only they know what checks they have written, automatic payments they have authorized and debit card transactions they have approved," Nessa Feddis, a spokeswoman for the American Bankers Association, said during congressional hearings earlier this year. "Simply put, consumers are in control of their finances and can avoid overdraft fees.

Holiday Gift Ideas From My Bank?

Link to ING Direct store Who'd have guessed banks would become a popular source of holiday gifts, other than good old-fashioned greenbacks of course?

Now that niche audiences can be targeted with online promotions during the holidays, many financial institutions are marketing financial products packaged as gifts. Prepaid Visa/MasterCards are the hottest item, but there's also potential in other areas. 

Gift cards
The second most popular gift item this year, after apparel, is expected to be prepaid cash cards. While the majority of the $20+ billion purchased will be direct from retailers, hundreds of banks and credit unions, such as Boeing Employees Credit Union (BECU) have joined the fray (see email below). If marketed right, financial institutions could gain a significant share of total sales. See our previous post here about integrating gift cards into online banking for more information.

Boeing Employees Credit Union gift card email BECU CLICK TO ENLARGE

Credit reports
Equifax
is taking advantage of the giving season to market credit reports and/or FICO score gift certificates. The cost is $20 for a three-bureau credit report, $15 for the FICO score and explanation, or $30 for both (see email below). An even better gift would be a year of credit monitoring.

Equifax email for credit report gifts CLICK TO ENLARGE

Investment accounts
For years, ShareBuilder has marketed "the gift of stock" during the holidays. This year, many of its partners, such as National City Bank, are offering a $50 gift card as a bonus for new accounts (see screenshot below). That way grandma and grandpa can give junior something that's good for him, an investment account for the future AND something he'll actually like, $50 to spend at the mall.

National City Sharebuilder landing page CLICK TO ENLARGE

Piggy bank 2.0
The Savings Machine from ING Direct For the younger set, ING Direct has for a year been selling The Savings Machine, a toy bank/calculator/ATM machine. And judging from the note on its website,* it's proving to be a popular Deal of the Month with a lower $17.95 price tag which includes free shipping (see inset). Several years ago, ING Direct reported nearly a million dollars in sales from its online merchandise store <shop.ingdirect.com>, an inexpensive way to get its name on the street.

*Note by the "Savings Machine" product page today: All orders placed from 4 Dec to 11 Dec will be shipped out the week of 11 Dec due to the large amount of backorders.

Automobile Title Insurance has Fee Income Potential

When it comes to generating incremental fee income, it's difficult to find new ideas. One you may not have considered is automobile title insurance.

Although we've purchased two used cars on eBay, we'd never heard of title insurance for autos until we read about it in the Wall Street Journal today. For a one-time fee of $50 to $60, consumers can buy insurance that protects them against fraudulent titles, including instances where a salvaged auto has had its title wiped clean by registering the vehicle in a state with more liberal salvage rules.

Firstam_titleguard_logoAccording to First American Corporation, which markets a $49.95 policy in a joint venture with Experian Automotive, 20% of salvaged autos end up with clean titles. The product is called TitleGuard Vehicle Title Insurance and is sold through a stand-alone website <autotitleguard.com> and through resellers such as Credit Union Direct Lending and Escrow.com.

Financial institution opportunities
There are two ways financial institutions could use title insurance:

  1. Education: In your auto-loans area, explain the ways that car titles can be manipulated with links to outside informational sources.
  2. Resell title insurance: Title insurance is most needed when purchasing vehicles from unknown private parties. Even if you don't finance such transactions, you could earn commissions on customers referred to third parties for title insurance.
  3. Bundle title insurance with loans: If you offer financing for private transactions, you could bundle title insurance with your loan to help differentiate your product and help justify premium pricing. The title insurance could be mandatory or optional and either way could be priced as a fee-based add-on or included in the regular loan-origination fee.

Making Money the Old-Fashioned Way: Fees

In the U.S., online banking fees have all but disappeared. Online account
access fees went by the wayside at the beginning of the Internet era (circa
1995) and bill pay fees have been disappearing in the wake of Bank of
America’s
highly advertised strategic decision to give away bill payment
beginning in 2002. However, as we discussed last month, do not give
up the notion of charging for online services. On the contrary, as more
users go online, there is a much bigger market for premium services along
the lines of American Express and Federal Express. Following is our list of
potential fee-based services and the range of potential charges. The “Low”
column lists the range of fees geared towards consumers, while the fees in
the “High” column are more appropriate for small businesses, which are much
less fee averse, and other high-end consumers.

Note: Commentary applies to the U.S. market only. Other international
markets have much different appetites for or against various fees.

 












 

Source: Online Banking Report, 9/04
Notes:

*The fees in the Low column are more appropriate for average consumer
users; the fees in the High column are more appropriate for micro and
small businesses, and some consumers with complex finances; for simplicity, we
have rounded most fees to the nearest whole dollar; however, common retail
pricing practices are to set prices below natural price points such as $9.95
instead of $10